scholarly journals Supercritical Carbon Dioxide(s-CO2) Power Cycle for Waste Heat Recovery: A Review from Thermodynamic Perspective

Processes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 1461
Author(s):  
Liuchen Liu ◽  
Qiguo Yang ◽  
Guomin Cui

Supercritical CO2 power cycles have been deeply investigated in recent years. However, their potential in waste heat recovery is still largely unexplored. This paper presents a critical review of engineering background, technical challenges, and current advances of the s-CO2 cycle for waste heat recovery. Firstly, common barriers for the further promotion of waste heat recovery technology are discussed. Afterwards, the technical advantages of the s-CO2 cycle in solving the abovementioned problems are outlined by comparing several state-of-the-art thermodynamic cycles. On this basis, current research results in this field are reviewed for three main applications, namely the fuel cell, internal combustion engine, and gas turbine. For low temperature applications, the transcritical CO2 cycles can compete with other existing technologies, while supercritical CO2 cycles are more attractive for medium- and high temperature sources to replace steam Rankine cycles. Moreover, simple and regenerative configurations are more suitable for transcritical cycles, whereas various complex configurations have advantages for medium- and high temperature heat sources to form cogeneration system. Finally, from the viewpoints of in-depth research and engineering applications, several future development directions are put forward. This review hopes to promote the development of s-CO2 cycles for waste heat recovery.

2021 ◽  
Vol 198 ◽  
pp. 117515
Author(s):  
Chendi Yang ◽  
Yuanyuan Deng ◽  
Ning Zhang ◽  
Xiaopeng Zhang ◽  
Gaohong He ◽  
...  

Energies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (18) ◽  
pp. 5886
Author(s):  
Xinxing Lin ◽  
Chonghui Chen ◽  
Aofang Yu ◽  
Likun Yin ◽  
Wen Su

To efficiently recover the waste heat of mobile engine, two advanced transcritical power cycles, namely split cycle and dual pressure cycle, are employed, based on the recuperative cycle. Performances of the two cycles are analyzed and compared through the development of thermodynamic models. Under given gas conditions, seven high-temperature working fluids, namely propane, butane, isobutane, pentane, isopentane, neopentane, and cyclopentane, are selected for the two cycles. At the design system parameters, the highest work 48.71 kW, is obtained by the split cycle with butane. For most of fluids, the split cycle has a higher work than the dual pressure cycle. Furthermore, with the increase of turbine inlet pressure, net work of the split cycle goes up firstly and then decreases, while the work of dual pressure cycle increases slowly. For the split cycle, there exists a split ratio to get the maximum network. However, for the dual pressure cycle, the larger the evaporation temperature, the higher the net work. On this basis, system parameters are optimized by genetic algorithm to maximize net work. The results indicate that the highest work 49.96 kW of split cycle is obtained by pentane. For the considered fluids, except cyclopentane, split cycle always has a higher work than dual pressure cycle. Due to the higher net work and fewer system components, split cycle is recommended for the engine waste heat recovery.


2017 ◽  
Vol 142 ◽  
pp. 1238-1243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoya Li ◽  
Gequn Shu ◽  
Hua Tian ◽  
Lingfeng Shi ◽  
Daiqiang Li ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document