scholarly journals A Note on Simulation Pricing of π-Options

Risks ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 90
Author(s):  
Zbigniew Palmowski ◽  
Tomasz Serafin
Keyword(s):  
Monte Carlo ◽  
Numerical Analysis ◽  
Upper Bounds ◽  
Monte Carlo Algorithm ◽  
Market Environment ◽  
The Real ◽  
Relative Maximum ◽  
Real Market ◽  
Maximum Drawdown

In this work, we adapt a Monte Carlo algorithm introduced by Broadie and Glasserman in 1997 to price a π-option. This method is based on the simulated price tree that comes from discretization and replication of possible trajectories of the underlying asset’s price. As a result, this algorithm produces the lower and the upper bounds that converge to the true price with the increasing depth of the tree. Under specific parametrization, this π-option is related to relative maximum drawdown and can be used in the real market environment to protect a portfolio against volatile and unexpected price drops. We also provide some numerical analysis.

scholarly journals Multilevel Monte Carlo methods and lower–upper bounds in initial margin computations

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-161
Author(s):  
Florian Bourgey ◽  
Stefano De Marco ◽  
Emmanuel Gobet ◽  
Alexandre Zhou
Keyword(s):  
Monte Carlo ◽  
Lower Bounds ◽  
Asymptotic Optimality ◽  
Upper Bounds ◽  
Upper And Lower Bounds ◽  
Independent Random Variables ◽  
Outer Function ◽  
Control Problems ◽  
Multilevel Monte Carlo ◽  
Primal Dual

AbstractThe multilevel Monte Carlo (MLMC) method developed by M. B. Giles [Multilevel Monte Carlo path simulation, Oper. Res. 56 2008, 3, 607–617] has a natural application to the evaluation of nested expectations {\mathbb{E}[g(\mathbb{E}[f(X,Y)|X])]}, where {f,g} are functions and {(X,Y)} a couple of independent random variables. Apart from the pricing of American-type derivatives, such computations arise in a large variety of risk valuations (VaR or CVaR of a portfolio, CVA), and in the assessment of margin costs for centrally cleared portfolios. In this work, we focus on the computation of initial margin. We analyze the properties of corresponding MLMC estimators, for which we provide results of asymptotic optimality; at the technical level, we have to deal with limited regularity of the outer function g (which might fail to be everywhere differentiable). Parallel to this, we investigate upper and lower bounds for nested expectations as above, in the spirit of primal-dual algorithms for stochastic control problems.

Examining sharp restart in a Monte Carlo method for the linearized Poisson–Boltzmann equation

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 223-244
Author(s):  
W. John Thrasher ◽  
Michael Mascagni
Keyword(s):  
Monte Carlo ◽  
Free Energy ◽  
Monte Carlo Algorithm ◽  
Significant Bias ◽  
Poisson Boltzmann ◽  
Electrostatic Free Energy ◽  
Poisson Boltzmann Equation ◽  
The Stability ◽  
Potential Methods ◽  
The Individual

AbstractIt has been shown that when using a Monte Carlo algorithm to estimate the electrostatic free energy of a biomolecule in a solution, individual random walks can become entrapped in the geometry. We examine a proposed solution, using a sharp restart during the Walk-on-Subdomains step, in more detail. We show that the point at which this solution introduces significant bias is related to properties intrinsic to the molecule being examined. We also examine two potential methods of generating a sharp restart point and show that they both cause no significant bias in the examined molecules and increase the stability of the run times of the individual walks.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document