scholarly journals A Novel Fast Multiple-Scattering Approximate Model for Oceanographic Lidar

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (18) ◽  
pp. 3677
Author(s):  
Zhenhua Zhang ◽  
Peng Chen ◽  
Zhihua Mao ◽  
Dapeng Yuan

An effective lidar simulator is vital for its system design and processing algorithms. However, laser transmission is a complex process due to the effects of sea surface and various interactions in seawater such as absorption, scattering, and so on. It is sophisticated and difficult for multiple scattering to accurately simulate. In this study, a multiple-scattering lidar model based on multiple-forward-scattering-single-backscattering approximation for oceanic lidar was proposed. Compared with previous analytic models, this model can work without assuming a homogeneous water and fixed scattering phase function. Besides, it takes consideration of lidar system and environmental parameters including receiver field of view, different scattering phase functions, particulate sizes, stratified water, and rough sea surface. One should note that because the scattering phase function is difficult to determine accurately, the simulation accuracy may be reduced in a complex oceanic environment. The Cox–Munk model used in our method simulates capillarity waves but ignores gravity waves, and the pulse stretching is not included. The wide-angle scattering occurs in the dense subsurface phytoplankton, which sometimes makes it hard to use this model. In this study, we firstly derived this method based on an analytical solution by convolving Gaussians of the forward-scattering contribution of layer dr and the energy density at R in the small-angle-scattering approximation. Then, the effects of multiple scattering and water optical properties were analyzed using the model. Meanwhile, the validation with Monte Carlo model was implemented. Their coefficient of determination is beyond 0.9, the RMSE is within 0.02, the MAD is within 0.02, and the MAPD is within 8%, which indicates that our model is efficient for oceanographic lidar simulation. Finally, we studied the effects of FOV, SPF, rough sea surface, stratified water, and particle size. These results can provide reference for the design of the oceanic lidar system and contribute to the processing of lidar echo signals.

2008 ◽  
Vol 65 (12) ◽  
pp. 3621-3635 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin J. Hogan

Abstract A fast, approximate method is described for the calculation of the intensity of multiply scattered lidar returns from clouds. At each range gate it characterizes the outgoing photon distribution by its spatial variance, the variance of photon direction, and the covariance of photon direction and position. The result is that for an N-point profile the calculation is O(N) efficient yet it implicitly includes all orders of scattering, in contrast with the O(Nm/m!) efficiency of models that explicitly consider each scattering order separately for truncation at m-order scattering. It is also shown how the shape of the scattering phase function near 180° may be taken into account for both liquid water droplets and ice particles. The model considers only multiple scattering due to small-angle forward-scattering events, which is suitable for most ground-based and airborne lidars because of their small footprint on the cloud. For spaceborne lidar, it must be used in combination with the wide-angle multiple scattering model described in Part II of this two-part paper.


1993 ◽  
Vol 71 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 39-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luc R. Bissonnette ◽  
Daniel L. Hutt

The multiple-scattering contributions to lidar aerosol backscatter returns are measured by simultaneous detection at four concentric fields of view. A solution method is proposed to calculate, from the ratios of the lidar returns at the different fields of view, the range-resolved scattering coefficient. The method also provides the effective size of the aerosol particles responsible for the forward peak of the scattering phase function. Solutions from measurements performed in fog and clouds with a 1.054 μm lidar system are presented.


2003 ◽  
Vol 114 (3) ◽  
pp. 1266-1280 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Miles ◽  
Robin N. Hewitt ◽  
Marcus K. Donnelly ◽  
Timothy Clarke

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document