scholarly journals Retrieving Rain Drop Size Distribution Moments from GPM Dual-Frequency Precipitation Radar

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (22) ◽  
pp. 4690
Author(s):  
Merhala Thurai ◽  
Viswanathan Bringi ◽  
David Wolff ◽  
David A. Marks ◽  
Patrick N. Gatlin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Size Distribution ◽  
Drop Size ◽  
Drop Size Distribution ◽  
Dual Frequency ◽  
Precipitation Radar ◽  
Distribution Moments ◽  
The Us ◽  
Rain Drop ◽  
Global Precipitation Mission ◽  
Global Precipitation

A novel method for retrieving the moments of rain drop size distribution (DSD) from the dual-frequency precipitation radar (DPR) onboard the global precipitation mission satellite (GPM) is presented. The method involves the estimation of two chosen reference moments from two specific DPR products, namely the attenuation-corrected Ku-band radar reflectivity and (if made available) the specific attenuation at Ka-band. The reference moments are then combined with a function representing the underlying shape of the DSD based on the generalized gamma model. Simulations are performed to quantify the algorithm errors. The performance of methodology is assessed with two GPM-DPR overpass cases over disdrometer sites, one in Huntsville, Alabama and one in Delmarva peninsula, Virginia, both in the US. Results are promising and indicate that it is feasible to estimate DSD moments directly from DPR-based quantities.

scholarly journals Validation of GPM Rainfall and Drop Size Distribution Products through Disdrometers in Italy

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. 2081
Author(s):  
Elisa Adirosi ◽  
Mario Montopoli ◽  
Alessandro Bracci ◽  
Federico Porcù ◽  
Vincenzo Capozzi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Size Distribution ◽  
Drop Size ◽  
Global Scale ◽  
Drop Size Distribution ◽  
Single Frequency ◽  
Dual Frequency ◽  
Near Surface ◽  
Active Sensor ◽  
Long Time ◽  
Global Precipitation

The high relevance of satellites for collecting information regarding precipitation at global scale implies the need of a continuous validation of satellite products to ensure good data quality over time and to provide feedback for updating and improving retrieval algorithms. However, validating satellite products using measurements collected by sensors at ground is still a challenging task. To date, the Dual-frequency Precipitation Radar (DPR) aboard the Core Satellite of the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission is the only active sensor able to provide, at global scale, vertical profiles of rainfall rate, radar reflectivity, and Drop Size Distribution (DSD) parameters from space. In this study, we compare near surface GPM retrievals with long time series of measurements collected by seven laser disdrometers in Italy since the launch of the GPM mission. The comparison shows limited differences in the performances of the different GPM algorithms, be they dual- or single-frequency, although in most cases, the dual-frequency algorithms present the better performances. Furthermore, the agreement between satellite and ground-based estimates depends on the considered precipitation variable. The agreement is very promising for rain rate, reflectivity factor, and the mass-weighted mean diameter (Dm), while the satellite retrievals need to be improved for the normalized gamma DSD intercept parameter (Nw).

Validation of satellite-borne precipitation radars by raingauges and disdrometers over the northeastern Indian subcontinent

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fumie Murata ◽  
Toru Terao ◽  
Yusuke Yamane ◽  
Masashi Kiguchi ◽  
Azusa Fukushima ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Indian Subcontinent ◽  
Monsoon Season ◽  
Precipitation Radar ◽  
Near Surface ◽  
Trmm Pr ◽  
Rain Drop ◽  
Distribution Parameters ◽  
Trmm Precipitation ◽  
Global Precipitation Mission ◽  
Global Precipitation

<p>The near surface rain (NSR) dataset of the Tropical Rainfall Measurement Mission (TRMM) Precipitation Radar (PR) and the Global Precipitation Mission (GPM) Dual Precipitation Radar (DPR) was validated using around 40 tipping bucket raingauges installed over the northeastern Indian subcontinent, and disdrometers in the Meghalaya Plateau, India. The comparison during 2006-2014 showed significant overestimation of TRMM PR in Assam and Bengal plains during pre-monsoon season (March to May), and significant underestimation of TRMM PR over the Indian subcontinent during monsoon season (June to September). Whereas, the comparison during 2014-2019 showed significant overestimation of GPM DPR over only Meghalaya during monsoon season. The validation of rain-drop size distribution parameters: Dm and Nw showed positive correlation between GPM DPR derived values and Parsivel disdrometers observed ones, while unrealistic concentration of Nw on 30-40 dB was derived by GPM DPR. In the southern slope of the Meghala Plateau, NSR of TRMM PR at Cherrapunji, where is known as the heaviest rainfall station, on the plateau observed smaller rainfall than that in the adjacent valley. However, newly installed raingauges in the valley showed rather less rainfall than that on the plateau. The validity of the satellite derived rainfall distribution over the complicated terrain are discussed.</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document