scholarly journals Automobile Industry Strategic Alliance Partner Selection: The Application of a Hybrid DEA and Grey Theory Model

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chia-Nan Wang ◽  
Xuan-Tho Nguyen ◽  
Yen-Hui Wang
2014 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 572-585 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Ahlstrom ◽  
Edward Levitas ◽  
Michael A. Hitt ◽  
M. Tina Dacin ◽  
Hong Zhu

1997 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 97-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saul Klein ◽  
Chekitan Dev

How should one select a strategic alliance partner? An answer to this question is provided by extending the literature on symbiotic marketing and focussing attention on market-driven strategic alliances. Such alliances are defined as long-term inter-firm co-operative relationships that add value for the customer. Value is created by providing the advantages of multiple choice purchase options coupled with the convenience of seamless, one-stop-shopping. This means paying attention to customers and competitors in selecting alliance partners. Market-driven strategic alliances are posited to be more successful when usage and firm complementarity levels are correctly matched with the alliance strategy being pursued.


2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 165-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peyman AKHAVAN ◽  
Sasan BARAK ◽  
Hamidreza MAGHSOUDLOU ◽  
Jurgita ANTUCHEVIČIENĖ

In today’s competitive environment, holding companies are usually unable to successfully compete in production of goods and services due to technological sophistication. Therefore, for success of holding companies, selecting appropriate strategic alliance partner is a critical factor. Accordingly, the aim of the paper is to propose a systematic approach for an effective partner selection. Firstly, the underlying motivation and reasons for a strategic alliance building are presented using a SWOT analysis. Criteria of partners’ evaluation are attained on the basis of combining strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats. Due to uncertainty of criteria, they are weighted using fuzzy quantitative strategic planning matrix (FQSPM). Because of a large number of criteria obtained from the SWOT-FQSPM analysis, criteria are diminished based on their weights using the Gap analysis with fuzzy data ranking. In the next step, it is proposed to apply four ranking algorithms including the Fuzzy Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS-F), the Fuzzy Complex Proportional Assessment (COPRAS-F), the Fuzzy Multi-Objective Optimization by Ratio Analysis (Fuzzy MOORA), and the Fuzzy Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal solution (Fuzzy TOPSIS) to evaluate strategic partners. Finally, the results are combined with the help of the Borda method to choose the best alternative. To illustrate the efficiency of the proposed approach, a real partner selection problem at a holding industries factory in Iran is presented.


2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 3515-3524 ◽  
Author(s):  
James J.H. Liou ◽  
Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng ◽  
Chieh-Yuan Tsai ◽  
Chao-Che Hsu

2004 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 173-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A. Hitt ◽  
David Ahlstrom ◽  
M. Tina Dacin ◽  
Edward Levitas ◽  
Lilia Svobodina

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zachary A. Collier ◽  
Matthew D. Wood ◽  
Dale A. Henderson

PurposeTrust entails the assumption of risk by the trustor to the extent that the trustee may act in a manner unaligned with the trustor's interests. Before a strategic alliance is formed, each firm formulates a subjective assessment regarding whether the other firm will behave in a trustworthy manner and not act opportunistically. To inform this partner analysis and selection process, the authors leverage the concept of value of information to quantify the benefit of information gathering activities on the trustworthiness of a potential trustee.Design/methodology/approachIn this paper, the authors develop a decision model that explicitly operationalizes trust as the subjective probability that a trustee will act in a trustworthy manner. The authors integrate the concept of value of information related to information gathering activities, which would inform a trustor about a trustee's trustworthiness.FindingsTrust inherently involves some degree of risk, and the authors find that there is practical value in carrying out information gathering activities to facilitate the partner analysis process. The authors present a list of trustworthiness indicators, along with a scoring sheet, to facilitate learning more about a potential strategic alliance partner.Originality/valueThe need for a quantitative model that can support risk-based strategic alliance decision-making for partner analysis represents a research gap in the literature. The modeling of strategic alliance partner analysis decisions from a value of information (VOI) perspective adds a contribution to the trust literature.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document