scholarly journals Using Shapley Values and Genetic Algorithms to Solve Multiobjective Optimization Problems

Symmetry ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. 2021
Author(s):  
Hsien-Chung Wu
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Algorithms ◽  
Multiobjective Optimization ◽  
Cooperative Game ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Optimal Solution ◽  
Payoff Function ◽  
Pareto Optimal ◽  
Objective Functions ◽  
Multiobjective Optimization Problems ◽  
Shapley Values

This paper proposes a new methodology to solve multiobjective optimization problems by invoking genetic algorithms and the concept of the Shapley values of cooperative games. It is well known that the Pareto-optimal solutions of multiobjective optimization problems can be obtained by solving the corresponding weighting problems that are formulated by assigning some suitable weights to the objective functions. In this paper, we formulated a cooperative game from the original multiobjective optimization problem by regarding the objective functions as the corresponding players. The payoff function of this formulated cooperative game involves the symmetric concept, which means that the payoff function only depends on the number of players in a coalition and is independent of the role of players in this coalition. In this case, we can reasonably set up the weights as the corresponding Shapley values of this formulated cooperative game. Under these settings, we can obtain the so-called Shapley–Pareto-optimal solution. In order to choose the best Shapley–Pareto-optimal solution, we used genetic algorithms by setting a reasonable fitness function.

A Newton method for capturing Pareto optimal solutions of fuzzy multiobjective optimization problems

2019 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 867-886
Author(s):  
Mehrdad Ghaznavi ◽  
Narges Hoseinpoor ◽  
Fatemeh Soleimani
Keyword(s):  
Multiobjective Optimization ◽  
Newton Method ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Order Relation ◽  
Pareto Optimal ◽  
Pareto Optimal Solutions ◽  
Optimal Solutions ◽  
Objective Functions ◽  
Multiobjective Optimization Problems ◽  
Generalized Hukuhara Differentiability

In this study, a Newton method is developed to obtain (weak) Pareto optimal solutions of an unconstrained multiobjective optimization problem (MOP) with fuzzy objective functions. For this purpose, the generalized Hukuhara differentiability of fuzzy vector functions and fuzzy max-order relation on the set of fuzzy vectors are employed. It is assumed that the objective functions of the fuzzy MOP are twice continuously generalized Hukuhara differentiable. Under this assumption, the relationship between weakly Pareto optimal solutions of a fuzzy MOP and critical points of the related crisp problem is discussed. Numerical examples are provided to demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed methodology. Finally, the convergence analysis of the method under investigation is discussed.

scholarly journals Cooperative multiobjective optimization with bounds on objective functions

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Kaliszewski ◽  
J. Miroforidis
Keyword(s):  
Multiobjective Optimization ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Optimal Solution ◽  
Knapsack Problems ◽  
Mixed Integer ◽  
Pareto Optimal ◽  
Multidimensional Knapsack ◽  
Multiobjective Optimization Problems ◽  
Time Limitations

Abstract When solving large-scale multiobjective optimization problems, solvers can get stuck because of memory and/or time limitations. In such cases, one is left with no information on the distance to the best feasible solution, found before the optimization process has stopped, to the true Pareto optimal solution. In this work, we show how to provide such information. To this aim we make use of the concept of lower shells and upper shells, developed in our earlier works. No specific assumptions about the problems to be solved are made. We illustrate the proposed approach on biobjective multidimensional knapsack problems derived from single-objective multidimensional knapsack problems in the Beasley OR Library. We address cases when a top-class commercial mixed-integer linear solver fails to provide Pareto optimal solutions attempted to be derived by scalarization.

Muiltiobjective Optimization Using Nondominated Sorting in Genetic Algorithms

1994 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 221-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Srinivas ◽  
Kalyanmoy Deb
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Algorithms ◽  
Multiobjective Optimization ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Single Point ◽  
Weight Vector ◽  
Pareto Optimal ◽  
Multiobjective Problems ◽  
Multiobjective Optimization Problems ◽  
Pareto Optimal Points ◽  
Nondominated Sorting

In trying to solve multiobjective optimization problems, many traditional methods scalarize the objective vector into a single objective. In those cases, the obtained solution is highly sensitive to the weight vector used in the scalarization process and demands that the user have knowledge about the underlying problem. Moreover, in solving multiobjective problems, designers may be interested in a set of Pareto-optimal points, instead of a single point. Since genetic algorithms (GAs) work with a population of points, it seems natural to use GAs in multiobjective optimization problems to capture a number of solutions simultaneously. Although a vector evaluated GA (VEGA) has been implemented by Schaffer and has been tried to solve a number of multiobjective problems, the algorithm seems to have bias toward some regions. In this paper, we investigate Goldberg's notion of nondominated sorting in GAs along with a niche and speciation method to find multiple Pareto-optimal points simultaneously. The proof-of-principle results obtained on three problems used by Schaffer and others suggest that the proposed method can be extended to higher dimensional and more difficult multiobjective problems. A number of suggestions for extension and application of the algorithm are also discussed.

An improved proximal method with quasi-distance for nonconvex multiobjective optimization problem

2022 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fouzia Amir ◽  
Ali Farajzadeh ◽  
Jehad Alzabut
Keyword(s):  
Multiobjective Optimization ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Optimal Solution ◽  
Convergence Result ◽  
Proximal Method ◽  
Pareto Solution ◽  
Multiobjective Optimization Problems ◽  
Locally Lipschitz ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Constrained Multiobjective Optimization

Abstract Multiobjective optimization is the optimization with several conflicting objective functions. However, it is generally tough to find an optimal solution that satisfies all objectives from a mathematical frame of reference. The main objective of this article is to present an improved proximal method involving quasi-distance for constrained multiobjective optimization problems under the locally Lipschitz condition of the cost function. An instigation to study the proximal method with quasi distances is due to its widespread applications of the quasi distances in computer theory. To study the convergence result, Fritz John’s necessary optimality condition for weak Pareto solution is used. The suitable conditions to guarantee that the cluster points of the generated sequences are Pareto–Clarke critical points are provided.

A Particle Swarm Optimizer for Constrained Multiobjective Optimization

2015 ◽  
pp. 1246-1276
Author(s):  
Wen Fung Leong ◽  
Yali Wu ◽  
Gary G. Yen
Keyword(s):  
Multiobjective Optimization ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Particle Swarm ◽  
Optimal Solution ◽  
Constraint Handling ◽  
Benchmark Problems ◽  
Particle Swarm Optimizer ◽  
Multiobjective Optimization Problems ◽  
Feasible Solutions ◽  
Constrained Multiobjective Optimization

Generally, constraint-handling techniques are designed for evolutionary algorithms to solve Constrained Multiobjective Optimization Problems (CMOPs). Most Multiojective Particle Swarm Optimization (MOPSO) designs adopt these existing constraint-handling techniques to deal with CMOPs. In this chapter, the authors present a constrained MOPSO in which the information related to particles' infeasibility and feasibility status is utilized effectively to guide the particles to search for feasible solutions and to improve the quality of the optimal solution found. The updating of personal best archive is based on the particles' Pareto ranks and their constraint violations. The infeasible global best archive is adopted to store infeasible nondominated solutions. The acceleration constants are adjusted depending on the personal bests' and selected global bests' infeasibility and feasibility statuses. The personal bests' feasibility statuses are integrated to estimate the mutation rate in the mutation procedure. The simulation results indicate that the proposed constrained MOPSO is highly competitive in solving selected benchmark problems.

scholarly journals A Quantum Adiabatic Algorithm for Multiobjective Combinatorial Optimization

Axioms ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamín Barán ◽  
Marcos Villagra
Keyword(s):  
Combinatorial Optimization ◽  
Multiobjective Optimization ◽  
Theorem Proving ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Pareto Optimal ◽  
Pareto Optimal Solutions ◽  
Optimal Solutions ◽  
Quantum Annealing ◽  
Multiobjective Optimization Problems ◽  
First Time

In this work we show how to use a quantum adiabatic algorithm to solve multiobjective optimization problems. For the first time, we demonstrate a theorem proving that the quantum adiabatic algorithm can find Pareto-optimal solutions in finite-time, provided some restrictions to the problem are met. A numerical example illustrates an application of the theorem to a well-known problem in multiobjective optimization. This result opens the door to solve multiobjective optimization problems using current technology based on quantum annealing.

A Particle Swarm Optimizer for Constrained Multiobjective Optimization

2015 ◽  
pp. 128-159
Author(s):  
Wen Fung Leong ◽  
Yali Wu ◽  
Gary G. Yen
Keyword(s):  
Multiobjective Optimization ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Particle Swarm ◽  
Optimal Solution ◽  
Constraint Handling ◽  
Benchmark Problems ◽  
Particle Swarm Optimizer ◽  
Multiobjective Optimization Problems ◽  
Feasible Solutions ◽  
Constrained Multiobjective Optimization

Generally, constraint-handling techniques are designed for evolutionary algorithms to solve Constrained Multiobjective Optimization Problems (CMOPs). Most Multiojective Particle Swarm Optimization (MOPSO) designs adopt these existing constraint-handling techniques to deal with CMOPs. In this chapter, the authors present a constrained MOPSO in which the information related to particles' infeasibility and feasibility status is utilized effectively to guide the particles to search for feasible solutions and to improve the quality of the optimal solution found. The updating of personal best archive is based on the particles' Pareto ranks and their constraint violations. The infeasible global best archive is adopted to store infeasible nondominated solutions. The acceleration constants are adjusted depending on the personal bests' and selected global bests' infeasibility and feasibility statuses. The personal bests' feasibility statuses are integrated to estimate the mutation rate in the mutation procedure. The simulation results indicate that the proposed constrained MOPSO is highly competitive in solving selected benchmark problems.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document