Competitive Algorithms for Online Multidimensional Knapsack Problems

In this paper, we study the online multidimensional knapsack problem (called OMdKP) in which there is a knapsack whose capacity is represented in m dimensions, each dimension could have a different capacity. Then, n items with different scalar profit values and m-dimensional weights arrive in an online manner and the goal is to admit or decline items upon their arrival such that the total profit obtained by admitted items is maximized and the capacity of knapsack across all dimensions is respected. This is a natural generalization of the classic single-dimension knapsack problem and finds several relevant applications such as in virtual machine allocation, job scheduling, and all-or-nothing flow maximization over a graph. We develop two algorithms for OMdKP that use linear and exponential reservation functions to make online admission decisions. Our competitive analysis shows that the linear and exponential algorithms achieve the competitive ratios of O(θα ) and O(łogł(θα)), respectively, where α is the ratio between the aggregate knapsack capacity and the minimum capacity over a single dimension and θ is the ratio between the maximum and minimum item unit values. We also characterize a lower bound for the competitive ratio of any online algorithm solving OMdKP and show that the competitive ratio of our algorithm with exponential reservation function matches the lower bound up to a constant factor.

A Simple and Efficient Technique to Generate Bounded Solutions for the Multidimensional Knapsack Problem: a Guide for OR Practitioners

The 0-1 Multidimensional Knapsack Problem (MKP) is a NP-Hard problem that has important applications in business and industry. Approximate solution approaches for the MKP in the literature typically provide no guarantee on how close generated solutions are to the optimum. This article demonstrates how general-purpose integer programming software (Gurobi) is iteratively used to generate solutions for the 270 MKP test problems in Beasley’s OR-Library such that, on average, the solutions are guaranteed to be within 0.094% of the optimums and execute in 88 seconds on a standard PC. This methodology, called the simple sequential increasing tolerance (SSIT) matheuristic, uses a sequence of increasing tolerances in Gurobi to generate a solution that is guaranteed to be close to the optimum in a short time. This solution strategy generates bounded solutions in a timely manner without requiring the coding of a problem-specific algorithm. The SSIT results (although guaranteed within 0.094% of the optimums) when compared to known optimums deviated only 0.006% from the optimums—far better than any published results for these 270 MKP test instances.

Optimization Method to Address Psychosocial Risks through Adaptation of the Multidimensional Knapsack Problem

This paper presents a methodological scheme to obtain the maximum benefit in occupational health by attending to psychosocial risk factors in a company. This scheme is based on selecting an optimal subset of psychosocial risk factors, considering the departments’ budget in a company as problem constraints. This methodology can be summarized in three steps: First, psychosocial risk factors in the company are identified and weighted, applying several instruments recommended by business regulations. Next, a mathematical model is built using the identified psychosocial risk factors information and the company budget for risk factors attention. This model represents the psychosocial risk optimization problem as a Multidimensional Knapsack Problem (MKP). Finally, since Multidimensional Knapsack Problem is NP-hard, one simulated annealing algorithm is applied to find a near-optimal subset of factors maximizing the psychosocial risk care level. This subset is according to the budgets assigned for each of the company’s departments. The proposed methodology is detailed using a case of study, and thirty instances of the Multidimensional Knapsack Problem are tested, and the results are interpreted under psychosocial risk problems to evaluate the simulated annealing algorithm’s performance (efficiency and efficacy) in solving these optimization problems. This evaluation shows that the proposed methodology can be used for the attention of psychosocial risk factors in real companies’ cases.

On Steady-State Evolutionary Algorithms and Selective Pressure: Why Inverse Rank-Based Allocation of Reproductive Trials Is Best

We analyse the impact of the selective pressure for the global optimisation capabilities of steady-state evolutionary algorithms (EAs). For the standard bimodal benchmark function TwoMax , we rigorously prove that using uniform parent selection leads to exponential runtimes with high probability to locate both optima for the standard ( +1) EA and ( +1) RLS with any polynomial population sizes. However, we prove that selecting the worst individual as parent leads to efficient global optimisation with overwhelming probability for reasonable population sizes. Since always selecting the worst individual may have detrimental effects for escaping from local optima, we consider the performance of stochastic parent selection operators with low selective pressure for a function class called TruncatedTwoMax, where one slope is shorter than the other. An experimental analysis shows that the EAs equipped with inverse tournament selection, where the loser is selected for reproduction and small tournament sizes, globally optimise TwoMax efficiently and effectively escape from local optima of TruncatedTwoMax with high probability. Thus, they identify both optima efficiently while uniform (or stronger) selection fails in theory and in practice. We then show the power of inverse selection on function classes from the literature where populations are essential by providing rigorous proofs or experimental evidence that it outperforms uniform selection equipped with or without a restart strategy. We conclude the article by confirming our theoretical insights with an empirical analysis of the different selective pressures on standard benchmarks of the classical MaxSat and multidimensional knapsack problems.