scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Third Dose of the COVID-19 Vaccine among Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis

Vaccines ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 95
Author(s):  
Orly Efros ◽  
Roi Anteby ◽  
Mirit Halfon ◽  
Eshcar Meisel ◽  
Eyal Klang ◽  
...  

Solid organ transplant recipients were demonstrated to have reduced antibody response to the first and second doses of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine. This review evaluated published data on the efficacy and safety of the third dose among solid organ transplant recipients. We performed a systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science to retrieve studies evaluating the efficacy of the third dose of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in adult solid organ transplant recipients. Serologic response after the third vaccine was pooled using inverse variance and generalized linear mixed and random-effects models. Seven studies met our inclusion criteria. A total of 853 patients received the third dose. Except for one randomized controlled trial, all studies were retrospective in design. Following the third COVID-19 vaccine dose, antibody response occurred in 6.4–69.2% of patients. The pooled proportion of antibody response rate after the third vaccine was 50.3% (95% confidence interval (CI): 37.1–63.5, I2 = 90%). Five papers reported the safety profile. No severe adverse events were observed after the third vaccine dose. In conclusion, a third dose of the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine in solid organ transplant recipients is associated with improved immunogenicity and appears to be safe. Nevertheless, a significant portion of patients remain seronegative.

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy Chang ◽  
Jennifer L. Alejo ◽  
Aura T. Abedon ◽  
Jonathan Mitchell ◽  
Teresa P.-Y. Chiang ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S386-S386
Author(s):  
Ahmad Yanis ◽  
Zaid Haddadin ◽  
Andrew Speaker ◽  
Danya Waqfi ◽  
Rana Talj ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised individuals, including solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR). Despite being excluded from phase 1-3 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine clinical trials, SOTR were identified as high-risk populations and prioritized for vaccination in public health guidelines. We aimed to evaluate the antibody response to two doses of the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccine in SOTR as compared to healthy controls (HC). Methods SOTR and HC scheduled to receive two doses of BNT162b2 vaccine and able to complete required follow-up visits were enrolled. Blood specimens were collected from participants before receiving the first and second doses and 21-42 days after the second dose. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to detect immunoglobulin G (IgG) to the SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain (RBD). Generalized estimating equations with a working independence correlation structure were used to compare anti-RBD IgG levels between SOTR and HC at each study visit and within each group over time. All models were adjusted for age, sex, and pre-vaccination seroreactivity in the ELISA. Results A total of 54 SOTR and 26 HC were enrolled, with mean (SD) ages of 72 (3.6) and 62 (6.7) years, 61% and 35% were male, and 91% and 88% were white, respectively. The most common organ transplant types were kidney (41%) and liver (37%). All SOTR were receiving calcineurin inhibitors. The median time post-transplantation was 7 years. SOTR had markedly lower mean anti-RBD IgG levels when compared to HC with adjusted mean differences of -0.76 (95%CI: [-1.04, -0.47]; p < 0.001) ELISA units (EU) and -1.35 (95%CI [-1.68, -1.01]; p < 0.001) EU after the first and second doses, respectively (Figure 1). Both groups had a significant increase in anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG levels after the second dose. However, the magnitude was lower in SOTR, 0.49 (95%CI [0.31, 0.69]; p < 0.001) EU than in HCs, 1.08 (95% CI [0.91, 1.24]; p < 0.001) EU. Figure 1. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 RBD IgG levels in solid organ transplant recipients and healthy controls before receiving the BNT162b2 vaccine (baseline), post-vaccine dose 1, and post-vaccine dose 2. Conclusion Our study showed SOTR mounted weaker humoral immune responses than HC to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. Given a lower response, SOTR should continue to practice social distancing and masking until data on vaccine efficacy are available in this vulnerable population. Disclosures Natasha B. Halasa, MD, MPH, Genentech (Other Financial or Material Support, I receive an honorarium for lectures - it's a education grant, supported by genetech)Quidel (Grant/Research Support, Other Financial or Material Support, Donation of supplies/kits)Sanofi (Grant/Research Support, Other Financial or Material Support, HAI/NAI testing) Natasha B. Halasa, MD, MPH, Genentech (Individual(s) Involved: Self): I receive an honorarium for lectures - it's a education grant, supported by genetech, Other Financial or Material Support, Other Financial or Material Support; Sanofi (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Grant/Research Support, Research Grant or Support


2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian J. Boyarsky ◽  
Teresa P-Y Chiang ◽  
Michael T. Ou ◽  
William A. Werbel ◽  
Allan B. Massie ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Megan L Zilla ◽  
Christian Keetch ◽  
Gretchen Mitchell ◽  
Jeffery McBreen ◽  
Michael R Shurin ◽  
...  

Abstract Background While it is presumed that immunosuppressed patients, such as solid organ transplant recipients on immunosuppression, are at greater risk from SARS-CoV-2 infection than the general population, the antibody response to infection in this patient population has not been studied. Methods In this report, we follow the anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels in patients with COVID-19 who are undergoing exogenous immunosuppression. Specifically, we studied the antibody response of three solid organ transplant recipient patients, three patients who take daily inhaled fluticasone, and a patient on etanercept and daily inhaled fluticasone, and compared them to five patients not on exogenous immunosuppression. Results We found that the solid organ transplant patients on full immunosuppression are at risk of having a delayed antibody response and poor outcome. We did not find evidence that inhaled steroids nor etanercept predispose patients to delayed immune response to SARS-CoV-2. Conclusion The data presented here suggest that solid organ transplant recipients may be good candidates for early targeted intervention against SARS-CoV-2.


2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer L. Alejo ◽  
Jonathan Mitchell ◽  
Teresa P.-Y. Chiang ◽  
Aura T. Abedon ◽  
Brian J. Boyarsky ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 100655
Author(s):  
Helio Tedesco-Silva ◽  
Faouzi Saliba ◽  
Markus J. Barten ◽  
Paolo DeSimone ◽  
Luciano Potena ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document