Textiles. Determination of resistance to water penetration. Hydrostatic pressure test

1982 ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 139 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Al-Gahtani ◽  
A. Khathlan ◽  
M. Sunar ◽  
M. Naffa'a

The juncture of a small cylindrical nozzle to a large cylindrical vessel is very common in the pressure vessel industry. Upon fabrication, it is required that the whole structure is subjected to pressure testing. The test can be expensive as it necessitates pressurizing the whole structure typically having a large volume. Hence, it is proposed to make a “local test,” which is considerably simpler as it involves capping the small nozzle and testing only a relatively small portion of the structure. This paper investigates the accuracy and reliability of such an alternative test, using the finite-element method. Two different finite-element types are used in the study, specifically a shell-based element and a solid-based element. The verification of the finite-element results for two different cases shows that the models used in the study are valid. It also proves that the two element types yield very similar stress results. In addition, the study includes a numerical investigation of more than 40 different nozzle-to-vessel junctures with a wide range of parameters for the nozzle and vessel. The results indicate that the use of cylindrical caps that are slightly larger than the nozzle is not recommended as it produces stresses that are significantly different from those for the original required pressure test. As such, the study provides an estimate of the smallest size of the cap that may be used in the local test to generate stresses that agree with the full test. For most practical geometries, it is shown that the size of the cap needs to be at least 2–30 times larger than that of the nozzle, depending on the geometrical parameters of the juncture.


Author(s):  
Yves De Vos ◽  
Jean-Paul Janssens ◽  
Leo van Kooten ◽  
Jörg Alexnat

The design and certification of a high performance recuperator for micro gas turbines is presented. The component has been developed and built for a 100kWel micro gas turbine. The recuperator heated up compressed air at 3.5 bar with exhaust gas near atmospheric pressure and recuperates 300 kWth at an effectiveness of 90%. This concept can readily be adapted for other micro gas turbines due to its modular design. The certification has been realized under Pressure Equipment Directive 97/23/EC, equivalent to ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, covering closed pressurized devices. However, minor leakage in the recuperator is allowed, thus requiring an inventive design and validation approach for meeting the certification requirements. This leak is caused by weld porosity: the heat exchanging core plates are laser welded, having over 1200 meters of sealing weld length in a single recuperator. The maximum allowable leak amounts to 3 10−6 mm2 per meter weld length. The maximum leak was 0.2% of the massflow on the pressurized side at the nominal operating point, and therefore did not adversely affect the effectiveness of the recuperator. The finite element calculations and the resulting design loops on components and weld connections are presented. Validation of the entire component is done under the Experimental Design Method. A hydrostatic pressure test at 8.4 bar and ambient temperature is executed in the presence of a certified notified body to demonstrate that the welds are sufficiently robust. This pressure is higher than the operating pressure to simulate the effect of temperature on the steel properties. A laser scanner is used to map the deformation of the unit under pressure and subsequently referenced to its original state. The maximum deviation measured is equal to 0.26 mm for the pressurized part, which is acceptable considering the size of the unit is 1000mm × 600mm × 1000mm. The strain levels went back to the values before putting the unit under pressure, indicating there are no residual deformations. The test is further accompanied with leakage rate measurements before and after the hydrostatic pressure test. If the difference between these leakages rates is within limits, the recuperator will pass the test. The measured total leakage area is 0.4 mm2, well below the maximum allowable value, and equivalent to 0.01% of the massflow at the nominal operating point. This means the recuperator passed the test successfully. Furthermore, a burst test was executed to determine the safety factor and to identify the weakest element of the design. The burst pressure is observed at 18.3 bar, resulting in a safety margin of 218% and 523% in reference to the PED and operational design pressures, respectively. The component responsible for failure has been further optimized for the next generation of recuperators. Field data confirm that the lifetime of the high performance recuperator meets the requirements of 40.000 h operating time. Additionally, the traceability of the serial produced components is handled by the audited quality management system. It covers the used materials, including lot traceability, the measured process characteristics and welder certifications. The approach can also be used for ASME certification.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document