Faculty Opinions recommendation of After-hours discharges from intensive care are associated with increased mortality.

Author(s):  
Andreas Valentin
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mi Kyoung Kim ◽  
Eun-Joo Jung ◽  
Seulkee Park ◽  
Im-kyung Kim

Abstract Background: Knowledge about the relationship between timing of admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) and mortality among surgical patients admitted for acute care is limited.Objective: We aimed to investigate whether admission to the surgical intensive care unit (SICU) during after-hours (all the times when intensivists were not staffed in the ICU) was associated with in-hospital mortality.Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary academic hospital, in which we analyzed data of 571 patients admitted to the SICU whose complete medical records were available. The work-hours were defined as 07:00-19:00 from Monday to Friday during which intensivists were staffed in the ICU. The after-hours were defined as all other times during which intensivists were not staffed in the SICU. The primary outcome measurement was in-hospital mortality according to the time of SICU admission.Results: In all, 333 and 238 patients were admitted to the SICU during work-hours and after-hours, respectively. Unplanned admissions (33.3% vs. 47.1%, p<0.001), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score ≥25 (11.1% vs. 23.9%, p<0.001), ventilator support (17.4% vs. 34.0%, p<0.001), and use of inotropics (33.3% vs. 50.0%, p<0.001) were significantly higher in the after-hours group than in the work-hours group. In the multivariate analyses of the association between the time of SICU admission and in-hospital mortality, the timing of SICU admission was an independent factor for in-hospital mortality (OR=2.526; 95% CI=1.010-6.320, p=0.048). Conclusions: In this study, we found that admission to the SICU during after-hours was associated with increased in-hospital mortality.


2011 ◽  
Vol 194 (11) ◽  
pp. 616-616 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dev A S Kevat ◽  
Andrew R Davies ◽  
Peter A Cameron ◽  
Shantha M W Rajaratnam

2007 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 148-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Numa ◽  
Gary Williams ◽  
John Awad ◽  
Barry Duffy

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 231
Author(s):  
Rory Miller ◽  
Samuel Bell ◽  
Lisa TenEyck ◽  
Meg Topping

ABSTRACT INTRODUCTIONIn New Zealand, critically ill patients who present to rural hospitals are typically treated, stabilised and transferred to facilities where more appropriate resources are available. AIMThe aim of this study was to describe patients who presented critically unwell and required retrieval from Thames Hospital in the Waikato region. METHODSNotes were reviewed retrospectively for patients who were retrieved from Thames Hospital between 1 April 2018 and 31 December 2020. Patients were excluded if they were retrieved from the offsite birthing centre or their notes were not available to the authors. RESULTSDuring the study period, 56 patients were retrieved by intensive care teams based at Waikato, Starship or Auckland Hospitals. Patients had a median age of 57 years and most were female (60.7%). Māori patients were over-represented in the retrieval cohort compared with the population presenting to the emergency department (30.4% vs. 20.1%, P &lt; 0.001). We found that 41% of patients presented after-hours when there was only one senior medical officer available on site and 70 procedures were performed, including rapid sequence induction, which was required by 19.6% of patients. DISCUSSIONThis study describes a population of critically unwell patients who were retrieved from a rural hospital. The key finding is that nearly half of these patients presented after-hours when there was only one senior medical officer available on site. This doctor also has sole responsibility for all other patients in the hospital. We recommend that referral centres streamline the retrieval processes for rural hospitals.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document