Faculty Opinions recommendation of Kin recognition in Aleochara bilineata could support the kinship theory of genomic imprinting.

Author(s):  
Nina Wedell
Genetics ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 175 (4) ◽  
pp. 1735-1740 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Lizé ◽  
Anne Marie Cortesero ◽  
Anne Atlan ◽  
Denis Poinsot

2009 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 189-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Lizé ◽  
Julie Clément ◽  
Anne Marie Cortesero ◽  
Denis Poinsot

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. 479-490 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hollie Marshall ◽  
Jelle S. van Zweden ◽  
Anneleen Van Geystelen ◽  
Kristof Benaets ◽  
Felix Wäckers ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. 20170643 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julian K. Christians ◽  
Katherine Leavey ◽  
Brian J. Cox

Genomic imprinting is essential for normal placental and fetal growth. One theory to explain the evolution of imprinting is the kinship theory (KT), which predicts that genes that are paternally expressed will promote fetal growth, whereas maternally expressed genes will suppress growth. We investigated the expression of imprinted genes using microarray measurements of expression in term placentae. Correlations between birthweight and the expression levels of imprinted genes were more significant than for non-imprinted genes, but did not tend to be positive for paternally expressed genes and negative for maternally expressed genes. Imprinted genes were more dysregulated in preeclampsia (a disorder associated with placental insufficiency) than randomly selected genes, and we observed an excess of patterns of dysregulation in preeclampsia that would be expected to reduce nutrient allocation to the fetus, given the predictions of the KT. However, we found no evidence of coordinated regulation among these imprinted genes. A few imprinted genes have previously been shown to be associated with fetal growth and preeclampsia, and our results indicate that this is true for a broader set of imprinted genes.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Kotler ◽  
Samuel A Mehr ◽  
Alena Egner ◽  
David Haig ◽  
Max Krasnow

Parent-offspring conflict, or the conflict over resources between parents and their children due to differences in genetic relatedness, is the biological foundation for a variety of psychological phenomena, including sibling rivalry and child abuse. This form of conflict is particularly relevant to the domain of parental investment: the provisioning of resources to offspring by parents and alloparents. The kinship theory of genomic imprinting is the primary evolutionary explanation for the occurrence of specialized genetic expression in chromosomal domains relevant to phenotypic expression of parent-offspring conflict. Specifically, complementary parental contributions in the same region of the genome promote opposing parental demand behaviors. This theory predicts that people with genomic imprinting disorders will show alterations in traits and behaviors related to parental investment. In this paper, we apply this prediction to the psychological resource of parental attention, for which vocalizations in general, and music in particular, may be an honest signal. Individuals with Prader-Willi syndrome show increased physiological responses to music listening consistent with a reduced demand for parental investment. Here we report the complementary pattern necessary to support the theory: we find that individuals with Angelman syndrome demonstrate a relatively reduced physiological response to music, consistent with an increased demand for parental investment. In addition to presenting evidence of the value of applying the kinship theory of genomic imprinting to psychological phenomena, these data provide a comprehensive test of the theory that at least one aspect of human musical psychology evolved to mediate conflict over attentional demands between parents and offspring.


Author(s):  
Hollie Marshall ◽  
Jelle S. van Zweden ◽  
Anneleen Van Geystelen ◽  
Kristof Benaets ◽  
Felix Wäckers ◽  
...  

AbstractGenomic imprinting is the differential expression of alleles in diploid individuals, with the expression being dependent upon the sex of the parent from which it was inherited. Haig’s kinship theory hypothesizes that genomic imprinting is due to an evolutionary conflict of interest between alleles from the mother and father. In social insects, it has been suggested that genomic imprinting should be widespread. One recent study identified parent-of-origin expression in honeybees and found evidence supporting the kinship theory. However, little is known about genomic imprinting in insects and multiple theoretical predictions must be tested to avoid single-study confirmation bias. We, therefore, tested for parent-of-origin expression in a primitively eusocial bee. We found equal numbers of maternally and paternally biased expressed alleles. The most highly biased alleles were maternally expressed, offering support for the kinship theory. We also found low conservation of potentially imprinted genes with the honeybee, suggesting rapid evolution of genomic imprinting in Hymenoptera.Impact summaryGenomic imprinting is the differential expression of alleles in diploid individuals, with the expression being dependent upon the sex of the parent from which it was inherited. Genomic imprinting is an evolutionary paradox. Natural selection is expected to favour expression of both alleles in order to protect against recessive mutations that render a gene ineffective. What then is the benefit of silencing one copy of a gene, making the organism functionally haploid at that locus? Several explanations for the evolution of genomic imprinting have been proposed. Haig’s kinship theory is the most developed and best supported.Haig’s theory is based on the fact that maternally (matrigene) and paternally (patrigene) inherited genes in the same organism can have different interests. For example, in a species with multiple paternity, a patrigene has a lower probability of being present in siblings that are progeny of the same mother than does a matrigene. As a result, a patrigene will be selected to value the survival of the organism it is in more highly, compared to the survival of siblings. This is not the case for a matrigene.Kinship theory is central to our evolutionary understanding of imprinting effects in human health and plant breeding. Despite this, it still lacks a robust, independent test. Colonies of social bees consist of diploid females (queens and workers) and haploid males created from unfertilised eggs. This along with their social structures allows for novel predictions of Haig’s theory.In this paper, we find parent of origin allele specific expression in the important pollinator, the buff-tailed bumblebee. We also find, as predicted by Haig’s theory, a balanced number of genes showing matrigenic or patrigenic bias with the most extreme bias been found in matrigenically biased genes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document