Faculty Opinions recommendation of KRAS mutations as an independent prognostic factor in patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab.

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola Normanno
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factor ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Independent Prognostic Factor ◽  
Kras Mutations

KRASMutations As an Independent Prognostic Factor in Patients With Advanced Colorectal Cancer Treated With Cetuximab

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 374-379 ◽  
Author(s):  
Astrid Lièvre ◽  
Jean-Baptiste Bachet ◽  
Valérie Boige ◽  
Anne Cayre ◽  
Delphine Le Corre ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factor ◽  
Kras Mutation ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Skin Toxicity ◽  
Independent Prognostic Factor ◽  
Allelic Discrimination ◽  
Kras Mutations

PurposeCetuximab is efficient in advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). We previously showed that KRAS mutations were associated with resistance to cetuximab in 30 CRC patients. The aim of this study was to validate, in an independent larger series of 89 patients, the prognostic value of KRAS mutations on response to cetuximab and survival.Patients and MethodsEighty-nine metastatic CRC patients treated with cetuximab after treatment failure with irinotecan-based chemotherapy were analyzed for KRAS mutation by allelic discrimination on tumor DNA. The association between KRAS mutations and tumor response, skin toxicity, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was analyzed.ResultsA KRAS mutation was present in 27% of the patients and was associated with resistance to cetuximab (0% v 40% of responders among the 24 mutated and 65 nonmutated patients, respectively; P < .001) and a poorer survival (median PFS: 10.1 v 31.4 weeks in patients without mutation; P = .0001; median OS: 10.1 v 14.3 months in patients without mutation; P = .026). When we pooled these 89 patients with patients from our previous study, the multivariate analysis showed that KRAS status was an independent prognostic factor associated with OS and PFS, whereas skin toxicity was only associated with OS. In a combined analysis, median OS times of patients with two, one, or no favorable prognostic factors (severe skin toxicity and no KRAS mutation) was of 15.6, 10.7, and 5.6 months, respectively.ConclusionThese results confirm the high prognostic value of KRAS mutations on response to cetuximab and survival in metastatic CRC patients treated with cetuximab.

Should KRAS Mutations Be Considered an Independent Prognostic Factor in Patients With Advanced Colorectal Cancer Treated With Cetuximab?

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (15) ◽  
pp. 2600-2600 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marina Chiara Garassino ◽  
Gabriella Farina ◽  
Antonio Rossi ◽  
Olga Martelli ◽  
Valter Torri
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factor ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Independent Prognostic Factor ◽  
Kras Mutations

KRASandBRAFMutations in Advanced Colorectal Cancer Are Associated With Poor Prognosis but Do Not Preclude Benefit From Oxaliplatin or Irinotecan: Results From the MRC FOCUS Trial

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (35) ◽  
pp. 5931-5937 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan D. Richman ◽  
Matthew T. Seymour ◽  
Philip Chambers ◽  
Faye Elliott ◽  
Catherine L. Daly ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factor ◽  
Braf Mutation ◽  
Poor Prognosis ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Predictive Biomarker ◽  
Poor Prognostic Factor ◽  
Minimal Impact ◽  
The Impact

PurposeActivating mutation of the KRAS oncogene is an established predictive biomarker for resistance to anti–epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) therapies in advanced colorectal cancer (aCRC). We wanted to determine whether KRAS and/or BRAF mutation is also a predictive biomarker for other aCRC therapies.Patients and MethodsThe Medical Research Council Fluorouracil, Oxaliplatin and Irinotecan: Use and Sequencing (MRC FOCUS) trial compared treatment sequences including first-line fluorouracil (FU), FU/irinotecan or FU/oxaliplatin in aCRC. Tumor blocks were obtained from 711 consenting patients. DNA was extracted and KRAS codons 12, 13, and 61 and BRAF codon 600 were assessed by pyrosequencing. Mutation (mut) status was assessed first as a prognostic factor and then as a predictive biomarker for the benefit of adding irinotecan or oxaliplatin to FU. The association of BRAF-mut with loss of MLH1 was assessed by immunohistochemistry.ResultsThree hundred eight (43.3%) of 711 patients had KRAS-mut and 56 (7.9%) of 711 had BRAF-mut. Mutation of KRAS, BRAF, or both was present in 360 (50.6%) of 711 patients. Mutation in either KRAS or BRAF was a poor prognostic factor for overall survival (OS; hazard ratio [HR], 1.40; 95% CI, 1.20 to 1.65; P < .0001) but had minimal impact on progression-free survival (PFS; HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.36; P = .05). Mutation status did not affect the impact of irinotecan or oxaliplatin on PFS or OS. BRAF-mut was weakly associated with loss of MLH1 staining (P = .012).ConclusionKRAS/BRAF mutation is associated with poor prognosis but is not a predictive biomarker for irinotecan or oxaliplatin. There is no evidence that patients with KRAS/BRAF mutated tumors are less likely to benefit from these standard chemotherapy agents.

Circulating Fibrinogen to Pre-albumin Ratio for Chemotherapy Efficacy Prediction and Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer Patients

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hou-Qun Ying ◽  
Fan Sun ◽  
Wei Wang ◽  
Dan Cai ◽  
Ying Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factor ◽  
Chronic Inflammation ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Independent Prognostic Factor ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Albumin Ratio ◽  
Response To Chemotherapy ◽  
Chemotherapy Efficacy

Abstract Background Evaluating chronic inflammation in colorectal cancer (CRC) may aid in identifying patients at the highest risk of recurrence or progression, and help inform clinical treatment decisions. Here, we report the effect of fibrinogen to pre-albumin ratio (FPR) in determining response to chemotherapy and reveal outcomes in CRC patients. Methods A total of 2917 eligible CRC patients from multiple-centers were enrolled, and the outcome of these patients was obtained by three years’ follow-up. Circulating fibrinogen, albumin, pre-albumin, CEA, CA199 and FPR were detected and calculated in these patients. Kaplan-Meier curves, Cox regression, time-dependent ROC, Harrell’s concordance index, calibration and decision curves were used to investigate the role of FPR in clinical outcome of CRC patients. Results Our results reveal significantly inferior outcomes in right- than left-sided patients with advanced CRC (stage III and IV), with preoperative FPR found to be a robust and independent prognostic factor for CRC at each stage. Moreover, prognostic nomograms, including FPR, effectively predicted clinical outcomes of the patients. Furthermore, preoperative FPR was significantly associated with chemotherapy efficacy. Specifically, low-grade (FPR < 15) and medium-grade (15 ≤ FPR < 20) FPR patients exhibited complete response to chemotherapy and attenuated chemosensitivity, respectively, whereas high-grade inflammation (FPR ≥ 20) conferred resistance to the treatment. Conclusion CRC-related inflammation affects response to chemotherapy and the resultant clinical outcomes. Circulating FPR is a simple, economically-friendly and robust independent prognostic factor for effectively predicting outcomes of CRC patients. Targeting chronic inflammation and its corresponding signaling pathway, coupled with measuring FPR, presents a novel approach for clinical management of CRC.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document