Faculty Opinions recommendation of SRP RNA controls a conformational switch regulating the SRP-SRP receptor interaction.

Author(s):  
Martin Pool
2008 ◽  
Vol 15 (9) ◽  
pp. 916-923 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saskia B Neher ◽  
Niels Bradshaw ◽  
Stephen N Floor ◽  
John D Gross ◽  
Peter Walter

2009 ◽  
Vol 20 (17) ◽  
pp. 3965-3973 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peera Jaru-Ampornpan ◽  
Thang X. Nguyen ◽  
Shu-ou Shan

Cotranslational protein targeting by the signal recognition particle (SRP) requires the SRP RNA, which accelerates the interaction between the SRP and SRP receptor 200-fold. This otherwise universally conserved SRP RNA is missing in the chloroplast SRP (cpSRP) pathway. Instead, the cpSRP and cpSRP receptor (cpFtsY) by themselves can interact 200-fold faster than their bacterial homologues. Here, cross-complementation analyses revealed the molecular origin underlying their efficient interaction. We found that cpFtsY is 5- to 10-fold more efficient than Escherichia coli FtsY at interacting with the GTPase domain of SRP from both chloroplast and bacteria, suggesting that cpFtsY is preorganized into a conformation more conducive to complex formation. Furthermore, the cargo-binding M-domain of cpSRP provides an additional 100-fold acceleration for the interaction between the chloroplast GTPases, functionally mimicking the effect of the SRP RNA in the cotranslational targeting pathway. The stimulatory effect of the SRP RNA or the M-domain of cpSRP is specific to the homologous SRP receptor in each pathway. These results strongly suggest that the M-domain of SRP actively communicates with the SRP and SR GTPases and that the cytosolic and chloroplast SRP pathways have evolved distinct molecular mechanisms (RNA vs. protein) to mediate this communication.


1995 ◽  
Vol 74 (05) ◽  
pp. 1323-1328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dominique Lasne ◽  
José Donato ◽  
Hervé Falet ◽  
Francine Rendu

SummarySynthetic peptides (TRAP or Thrombin Receptor Activating Peptide) corresponding to at least the first five aminoacids of the new N-terminal tail generated after thrombin proteolysis of its receptor are effective to mimic thrombin. We have studied two different TRAPs (SFLLR, and SFLLRN) in their effectiveness to induce the different platelet responses in comparison with thrombin. Using Indo-1/AM- labelled platelets, the maximum rise in cytoplasmic ionized calcium was lower with TRAPs than with thrombin. At threshold concentrations allowing maximal aggregation (50 μM SFLLR, 5 μM SFLLRN and 1 nM thrombin) the TRAPs-induced release reaction was about the same level as with thrombin, except when external calcium was removed by addition of 1 mM EDTA. In these conditions, the dense granule release induced by TRAPs was reduced by over 60%, that of lysosome release by 75%, compared to only 15% of reduction in the presence of thrombin. Thus calcium influx was more important for TRAPs-induced release than for thrombin-induced release. At strong concentrations giving maximal aggregation and release in the absence of secondary mediators (by pretreatment with ADP scavengers plus aspirin), SFLLRN mobilized less calcium, with a fast return towards the basal level and induced smaller lysosome release than did thrombin. The results further demonstrate the essential role of external calcium in triggering sustained and full platelet responses, and emphasize the major difference between TRAP and thrombin in mobilizing [Ca2+]j. Thus, apart from the proteolysis of the seven transmembrane receptor, another thrombin binding site or thrombin receptor interaction is required to obtain full and complete responses.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document