Faculty Opinions recommendation of Perioperative intravenous amiodarone does not reduce the burden of atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing cardiac valvular surgery.

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph Szokol
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Valvular Surgery ◽  
Intravenous Amiodarone

scholarly journals Perioperative Intravenous Amiodarone Does Not Reduce the Burden of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Valvular Surgery

2010 ◽  
Vol 112 (1) ◽  
pp. 128-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanick Beaulieu ◽  
André Y. Denault ◽  
Pierre Couture ◽  
Denis Roy ◽  
Mario Talajic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Channel Blocker ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Common Complication ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Valvular Surgery ◽  
Intravenous Amiodarone ◽  
Double Blinded ◽  
Preoperative Factors

Background Atrial fibrillation is a common complication after cardiac surgery. Postoperative atrial fibrillation is associated with increased risks of morbidity and mortality, and, therefore, preventive strategies using oral amiodarone have been developed but are often unpractical. Intravenous amiodarone administered after the induction of anesthesia and continued postoperatively for 48 h could represent an effective strategy to prevent postoperative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing cardiac valvular surgery. Methods Single-center, double-blinded, double-dummy, randomized controlled trial in patients undergoing valvular surgery. Patients received either an intravenous loading dose of 300 mg of amiodarone or placebo in the operating room, followed by a perfusion of 15 mg . kg(-1) . 24 h(-1) for 2 days. The primary endpoint was the development of atrial fibrillation occurring at any time within the postoperative period. Results One hundred twenty patients were randomly assigned (mean age was 65 +/- 11 yr). Overall atrial fibrillation occurred more frequently in the perioperative intravenous amiodarone group compared with the placebo group (59.3 vs. 40.0%; P = 0.035). Four preoperative factors were found to be independently associated with a higher risk of developing postoperative atrial fibrillation: older age (P = 0.0003), recent myocardial infarction (<6 months; P = 0.026), preoperative angina (P = 0.0326), and use of a calcium channel blocker preoperatively (P = 0.0078) when controlling for groups. Conclusion In patients undergoing cardiac valvular surgery, a strategy using intravenous amiodarone for 48 h is not efficacious in reducing the risk of atrial fibrillation during cardiac valvular surgery.

scholarly journals Clinical predictors and angiographic features of acute coronary syndromes caused by systemic embolism

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Jeronimo Baza ◽  
C Salazar ◽  
M.J Perez Vyzcaino ◽  
L Nombela ◽  
P Jimenez Quevedo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Acute Coronary Syndromes ◽  
Tertiary Hospital ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Systemic Embolism ◽  
Clinical Predictors ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Valvular Surgery ◽  
Coronary Syndromes

Abstract Introduction Systemic embolism to coronary arteries is one of the mechanisms of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) of non-atherosclerotic cause. However, its clinical profile has not been properly established yet. Purpose To identify clinical predictors and angiographic characteristics of acute coronary syndromes caused by systemic embolism to a principal coronary artery (ACS-E), as well as to describe in-hospital mortality of these patients. Methods 40 patients with ACS-E, admitted between 2003 and 2018 in a tertiary hospital. Epidemiological, clinical and angiographic characteristics of these cases were compared with those from 4989 patients, attended for acute coronary syndrome of atherosclerotic cause (ACS-A) in the same hospital during the same period. Results Patients with ACS-E were younger (28% vs 10% were <45 years old, p<0.001) and had a higher proportion of women (43% vs 22%, p 0.003), atrial fibrillation (40% vs 5%, p<0.001) and neoplasia (18% vs 7%, p 0.009). They had also undergone previous valvular surgery more frequently than patients with ACS-A (13% vs 0.5%, p<0.001) and a higher proportion of them were under treatment with warfarin (15% vs 3%, p<0.001). Variables identified as independent predictors of ACS-E in the multivariate analysis are shown in the table. Regarding clinical presentation, ST elevation AMI was more frequent in ACS-E cases (83% vs 67%, p 0.04). Patients with ACS-E did not present any significative stenosis in other vessels apart from the culprit one (number of other vessels with at least 1 severe stenosis was 0 in the ACS-E group vs 1.33 + 1 in the ACS-A arm, p<0.001). PCI was attempted in 75% of the patients with ACS-E, resulting successful in 80% of the cases. On the other hand, 100% of SCA-A underwent PCI, with a success proportion of 99% (p<0.001). In-hospital mortality in ACS-E group was 15% and 4% in the control group (p<0.001). Conclusions ACS-E and ACS-A have different clinical and angiographic features. Atrial fibrillation, chronic warfarin treatment, previous valvular surgery, presence of any neoplasia and female sex are independent predictors for ACS-E. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

scholarly journals Subacute postoperative atrial fibrillation after heart surgery: incidence and predictive factors in cardiac rehabilitation

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
V Rizza ◽  
F Maranta ◽  
L Cianfanelli ◽  
R Grippo ◽  
C Meloni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Heart Surgery ◽  
Troponin T ◽  
Management Strategies ◽  
Inpatient Rehabilitation ◽  
Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Funding Sources ◽  
Valvular Surgery

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background. Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is the most common arrhythmic complication following cardiac surgery. It may occur between the second and fourth postoperative days as acute POAF, or within 30 days as subacute POAF (sPOAF). The incidence varies from 15% to 60%, with the highest rates observed in patients undergoing valvular surgery. POAF is associated with longer hospital stay and higher thromboembolic risk, which consistently increase patients’ morbidity and mortality. Identification of high-risk categories may allow optimization of in-hospital prevention and treatment, possibly improving clinical outcomes. Aim of the study. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of sPOAF and to identify possible predictors in patients performing Cardiovascular Rehabilitation (CR) after Cardiac Surgery (CS). Methods. A single-centre retrospective study was performed on 383 post-cardiac surgery patients hospitalised in our CR Unit for inpatient rehabilitation. The entire population was on sinus rhythm at the admission in CR and continuous monitoring with 12-lead ECG telemetry was performed during the hospital stay. We calculated the incidence of sPOAF and then evaluated the predictive value of the following variables: anamnestic data, type of cardiac intervention, clinical course in both CS and CR Unit, laboratory parameters including baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR). Results. Median age was 65 years (63% male). sPOAF was documented in 122 cases (31.9%). Patients developing sPOAF were older [median age 69 (63-76) vs. 61 (51-70); p < 0.001)], more frequently underwent complex surgical procedures (50% vs. 36%; p = 0.009) and were known for previous episodes of atrial fibrillation (27.9% vs. 11.2%; p < 0.001). On the first day after surgery (T1), sPOAF group showed higher values of glycemia [median 155 (126.5–186.8) vs. 129 (106.5–164); p < 0.001] and troponin T [median 721.5 (470.1–1084.3) vs. 488 (301.6-776.2); p < 0.001]. The multivariate analysis identified advanced age (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.08; p = 0.023), acute POAF in the Cardiac Surgery Unit (OR 3.51, 95% CI 1.62-7.59; p = 0.001), baseline NLR (OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.10-1.93; p = 0.008) and T1-troponin > 552 ng/L (OR 4.16 95% CI 1.50-11.53; p = 0.006) as independent risk predictors of sPOAF during the CR period. Conclusions. sPOAF is common after cardiac surgery occurring in 31.9% of patients during CR. Age, acute POAF, baseline NLR and elevated troponin T on the first postoperative day were shown predictors of increased sPOAF risk. Recognition of new predictors of POAF could be helpful to better stratify patients, improving management strategies and outcomes.

Atrial fibrillation early postoperatively following minimally invasive cardiac valvular surgery

1999 ◽  
Vol 84 (6) ◽  
pp. 744-747 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig R Asher ◽  
Josephine M DiMengo ◽  
Kristopher L Arheart ◽  
Monica M Weber ◽  
Richard A Grimm ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Valvular Surgery

Hypersensitivity Reaction to Amiodarone in a Patient with a Previous Reaction to an lodinated Radiocontrast Agent

2007 ◽  
Vol 41 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 1310-1314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leanne Stafford
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Hypersensitivity Reaction ◽  
Product Information ◽  
Artery Bypass ◽  
Amiodarone Therapy ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Radiocontrast Agent ◽  
Triple Vessel Disease ◽  
Intravenous Amiodarone ◽  
Previous Reaction

Objective: To describe a case of a hypersensitivity reaction to oral amiodarone in a patient with a previous reaction to an iodinated radiocontrast agent. Case Summary: A 55-year-old man experienced facial urticaria after intraarterial injection of iohexol, an iodinated radiocontrast agent, during coronary angiography, which was successfully treated with intravenous hydrocortisone and promethazine. The procedure revealed significant triple vessel disease, and the patient subsequently underwent coronary artery bypass grafting in October 2006. Postoperatively, the patient experienced 2 episodes of fast atrial fibrillation, the first of which was treated successfully with intravenous amiodarone. The second episode resulted in the commencement of therapy with oral amiodarone 400 mg 3 times daily. Within one hour after the first dose, the patient experienced tip swelling and tingling, which was again treated with intravenous promethazine. Amiodarone was stopped; the patient remained in sinus rhythm and was discharged without further incident. Discussion: Amiodarone is a class III antiarrhythmic agent frequently used in the management of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. The approved product information lists known hypersensitivity to iodine as a contraindication to its administration, but no other cases of amiodarone hypersensitivity in a patient with a previous reaction to an iodinated radiocontrast agent have been published, Conversely, it has been suggested that the drug may be safely used in such patients. The Naranjo probability scale supported a probable adverse reaction of hypersensitivity associated with amiodarone therapy in this patient. Conclusions: Prescribers should exercise caution in the administration of amiodarone to patients with a true, documented history of hypersensitivity to an iodinated compound.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document