Faculty Opinions recommendation of A randomized clinical trial to evaluate optimal treatment for unexplained infertility: the fast track and standard treatment (FASTT) trial.

Author(s):  
Pak Chung Ho ◽  
Tracy Yeung
2010 ◽  
Vol 94 (3) ◽  
pp. 888-899 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard H. Reindollar ◽  
Meredith M. Regan ◽  
Peter J. Neumann ◽  
Bat-Sheva Levine ◽  
Kim L. Thornton ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 239-242
Author(s):  
Jianwei Zhu ◽  
Ruoqing Chen ◽  
Sabina Davidsson ◽  
Jessica Carlsson ◽  
Anna Messing‐Eriksson ◽  
...  

Trials ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne van der Meij ◽  
Marianne A. A. van Walderveen ◽  
Nyika D. Kruyt ◽  
Erik W. van Zwet ◽  
Eric J. Liebler ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Secondary damage due to neurochemical and inflammatory changes in the penumbra in the first days after ischemic stroke contributes substantially to poor clinical outcome. In animal models, vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) inhibits these detrimental changes and thereby reduces tissue injury. The aim of this study is to investigate whether non-invasive cervical VNS (nVNS) in addition to the current standard treatment can improve penumbral recovery and limit final infarct volume. Methods NOVIS is a single-center prospective randomized clinical trial with blinded outcome assessment. One hundred fifty patients will be randomly allocated (1:1) within 12 h from clinical stroke onset to nVNS for 5 days in addition to standard treatment versus standard treatment alone. The primary endpoint is the final infarct volume on day 5 assessed with MRI. Discussion We hypothesize that nVNS will result in smaller final infarct volumes as compared to standard treatment due to improved penumbral recovery. The results of this study will be used to assess the viability and approach to power a larger trial to more definitively assess the clinical efficacy of nVNS after stroke. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.govNCT04050501. Registered on 8 August 2019


2009 ◽  
Vol 33 (11) ◽  
pp. 2433-2438 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniela Ionescu ◽  
Cornel Iancu ◽  
Daniela Ion ◽  
Nadim Al-Hajjar ◽  
Simona Margarit ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol In Press (In Press) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mojtaba Varshochi ◽  
Mohammad Shahi ◽  
Maryam Rahimzadeh ◽  
Hasan Amini ◽  
Ramin Mohammadzadeh

Background: Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the super-spreading virus, has claimed hundreds of thousands of lives worldwide. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the novel suggested herbal compound, formulated as compressed tablets, in reducing the length of hospital stay (LoS), intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and mortality in confirmed COVID-19 cases. Methods: Following an open-label, single-blind randomized clinical trial design, a total of 200 patients aged 18-65 admitted to Imam Reza hospital in Tabriz, northwest of Iran, were randomized to intervention and control groups in a 1:1 ratio, i.e., 100 subjects in each group. The former received standard treatment along with the compressed herbal tablets, and the latter only received the standard treatment. Adverse reactions incidence within 180 days after the beginning of the intervention was set as the primary safety endpoint. The most important and active ingredients of the tablets were Terminalia chebula, Glycyrrhiza glabra, Anacyclus pyrethrum, Senna alexandrina, Ferrula asafoetida, Pistacia lentiscus, Zizyphus jujuba, Crocus sativus, Echinacea angustifolia, and Hyssopus officinalis. This trial is registered at the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (code: IRCT20200522047545N1). Results: Those in the intervention arm had significantly lower rates of LoS (7.38 vs. 9.45, P = 0.030), ICU admission (6 out of 100 vs. 32 out of 100, P = 0.000), and mortality (1 vs. 19 out of 100, P = 0.000). Conclusions: Our observations suggest that adequate improvement is provided by the prepared herbal compound along with substantial savings in hospitalization hoteling costs. While further multi-center studies with a larger sample size are needed to extend our knowledge regarding the effect of this new option, these novel clinical data may well provide a new alternative for the management of COVID-19 disease.


2009 ◽  
Vol 92 (3) ◽  
pp. S32-S33 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.B. Goldman ◽  
T.A. MacKenzie ◽  
M.M. Regan ◽  
M.M. Alper ◽  
K.L. Thornton ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document