Faculty Opinions recommendation of Effects of phosphate binders in moderate CKD.

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Albert Ong ◽  
Tim Ellam
Keyword(s):  
Phosphate Binders

Phosphate binders in patients with chronic kidney disease: Between the new and the old.

2019 ◽  
pp. 2-3
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Kidney Disease ◽  
Kidney Disease ◽  
Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate ◽  
Chronic Kidney Disease Stage ◽  
Disease Stage ◽  
Phosphate Binders ◽  
Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease ◽  
Phosphate Retention ◽  
Stage 4 ◽  
Dietary Phosphate

Impaired phosphate excretion by the kidney leads to Hyperphosphatemia. It is an independent predictor of cardiovascular disease and mortality in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (stage 4 and 5) particularly in case of dialysis. Phosphate retention develops early in chronic kidney disease (CKD) due to the reduction in the filtered phosphate load. Overt hyperphosphatemia develops when the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) falls below 25 to 40 mL/min/1.73 m2. Hyperphosphatemia is typically managed with oral phosphate binders in conjunction with dietary phosphate restriction. These drugs aim to decrease serum phosphate by binding ingested phosphorus in the gastrointestinal tract and its transformation to non-absorbable complexes [1].

scholarly journals Implementation and effectiveness of an intensive education program on phosphate control among hemodialysis patients: a non-randomized, single-arm, single-center trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinmei Yin ◽  
Jun Yin ◽  
Rongli Lian ◽  
Peiqiu Li ◽  
Jing Zheng
Keyword(s):  
Education Program ◽  
Hemodialysis Patients ◽  
Serum Phosphorus ◽  
Phosphate Binders ◽  
Maintenance Hemodialysis ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Clinical Trial Registry ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Intensive Education ◽  
Phosphate Control

Abstract Background Hyperphosphatemia is a common complication in patients on maintenance hemodialysis. Patients’ adherence to phosphorus control can be improved by consistent education. However, few studies have focused on the model construction and effects of health education on phosphate control for hemodialysis patients. Objective To develop an intensive education program focusing on phosphate control among hemodialysis patients and to analyze the effectiveness of this program. Design A non-randomized, single-arm, single-center trial lasting for 6 months. Setting This program was conducted in a hemodialysis center in a teaching hospital in Zhuhai, China. Participants Patients on maintenance hemodialysis with hyperphosphatemia. Methods An intensive hyperphosphatemia control education program lasting for 6 months was conducted among 366 hemodialysis patients applying the First Principles of Instruction model, which focused on mastering four stages: (a) activation of prior experience, (b) demonstration of skills, (c) application of skills and (d) integration of these skills into real-world activities. The controlled percentage of serum phosphorus, knowledge of hyperphosphatemia, and adherence to phosphate binders before and after the education program were assessed. Results The proportion of controlled serum phosphorus was significantly increased from 43.5 to 54.9% (P<0.001). The scores on the knowledge of phosphate control were improved significantly from 59.0 ± 18.9 to 80.6 ± 12.4 (P < 0.001). The proportion of high adherence to phosphate binders was increased dramatically from 21.9 to 44.5% (P < 0.001). Conclusion The intensive education program can effectively improve serum phosphorus, knowledge of hyperphosphatemia, and adherence to phosphate binders among hemodialysis patients. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2100042017. Retrospectively registered January 12th, 2021.

scholarly journals Phosphate Control: The Next Frontier in Dialysis Cardiovascular Mortality

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Peter A. McCullough
Keyword(s):  
Calcium Acetate ◽  
Paracellular Pathway ◽  
Ferric Citrate ◽  
Morbidity And Mortality ◽  
Phosphate Binders ◽  
Phosphate Absorption ◽  
Phosphate Retention ◽  
Sevelamer Carbonate ◽  
Prescribing Information ◽  
Phosphate Control

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a major cause of death in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) on dialysis. Mortality rates are still unacceptably high even though they have fallen in the past 2 decades. Hyperphosphatemia (elevated serum phosphate levels) is seen in almost all patients with advanced CKD and is by far the largest remaining modifiable contributor to CKD mortality. <b><i>Summary:</i></b> Phosphate retention drives multiple physiological mechanisms linked to increased risk of CVD. Fibroblast growth factor 23 and parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels, both of which have been suggested to have direct pathogenic CV effects, increase in response to phosphate retention. Phosphate, calcium, and PTH levels are linked in a progressively worsening cycle. Maladaptive upregulation of phosphate absorption is also likely to occur further exacerbating hyperphosphatemia. Even higher phosphate levels within the normal range may be a risk factor for vascular calcification and, thus, CV morbidity and mortality. A greater degree of phosphate control is important to reduce the risk of CV morbidity and mortality. Improved phosphate control and regular monitoring of phosphate levels are guideline-recommended, established clinical practices. There are several challenges with the current phosphate management approaches in patients with CKD on dialysis. Dietary restriction of phosphate and thrice-weekly dialysis alone are insufficient/unreliable to reduce phosphate to &#x3c;5.5 mg/dL. Even with the addition of phosphate binders, the only pharmacological treatment currently indicated for hyperphosphatemia, the majority of patients are unable to achieve and maintain phosphate levels &#x3c;5.5 mg/dL (or more normal levels) [PhosLo® gelcaps (calcium acetate): 667 mg (prescribing information), 2011, VELPHORO®: (Sucroferric oxyhydroxide) (prescribing information), 2013, FOSRENAL®: (Lanthanum carbonate) (prescribing information), 2016, AURYXIA®: (Ferric citrate) tablets (prescribing information), 2017, RENVELA®: (Sevelamer carbonate) (prescribing information), 2020, RealWorld dynamix. Dialysis US: Spherix Global Insights, 2019]. Phosphate binders do not target the primary pathway of phosphate absorption (paracellular), have limited binding capacity, and bind nonspecifically [PhosLo® gelcaps (calcium acetate): 667 mg (prescribing information). 2013, VELPHORO®: (Sucroferric oxyhydroxide) (prescribing information), 2013, FOSRENAL®: (Lanthanum carbonate) (prescribing information), 2016, AURYXIA®: (Ferric citrate) tablets (prescribing information), 2017, RENVELA®: (Sevelamer carbonate) (prescribing information) 2020]. <b><i>Key Messages:</i></b> Despite current phosphate management strategies, most patients on dialysis are unable to consistently achieve target phosphate levels, indicating a need for therapeutic innovations [RealWorld dynamix. Dialysis US: Spherix Global Insights, 2019]. Given a growing evidence base that the dominant mechanism of phosphate absorption is the intestinal paracellular pathway, new therapies are investigating ways to reduce phosphate levels by blocking absorption through the paracellular pathway.

scholarly journals P1404A PHASE 2 OPEN-LABEL, SINGLE-ARM, FIRST JAPANESE STUDY OF TENAPANOR, A NOVEL PHOSPHATE ABSORPTION INHIBITOR, FOCUSING ON PILL BURDEN DECREASE IN PATIENTS WITH HYPERPHOSPHATEMIA UNDERGOING HEMODIALYSIS

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tadao Akizawa ◽  
Hironori Kanda ◽  
Masayuki Takanuma ◽  
Jun Kinoshita ◽  
Masafumi Fukagawa
Keyword(s):  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Serum Phosphorus ◽  
Phosphate Binders ◽  
Pill Burden ◽  
Phosphorus Level ◽  
Serum Phosphorus Level ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Phosphate Absorption ◽  
Phosphorus Control

Abstract Background and Aims Phosphate binders (PB) are usually prescribed to dialysis patients with hyperphosphatemia. Several studies have reported that higher PB pill burden may reduce adherence and lead to insufficient phosphorus control. Tenapanor is an investigational, minimally absorbed, orally administered, non-binder, small-molecule that inhibits the sodium/hydrogen exchanger isoform 3 (NHE3) in development for the control of serum phosphorus. A previous Ph3 study sponsored by Ardelyx, Inc. (NCT02675998) showed a significant phosphorus decrease compared to the placebo in patients with hyperphosphatemia undergoing hemodialysis (HD) in the US. Tenapanor was expected to reduce PB pill burden since it is administered as one small pill, taken twice a day. This was the first study in Japanese HD patients, which aimed to confirm whether tenapanor reduces the pill burden of PB. Method This was a multicenter, open-label, single-arm Ph2 study. The study consists of a screening period, a 3-week observation period, and a 26-week treatment period. Patients whose serum phosphorus level was ≥ 3.5 and ≤ 7.0 mg/dL, taking at least two PB pills three times a day were enrolled. The patients started to receive 30 mg of tenapanor twice daily. The tenapanor dose could be reduced in a step-wise manner (60, 40, 20 and 10 mg/day) at the investigator’s discretion, based on GI tolerability. PB treatment was continued according to individual regimens, however, the dose could be adjusted appropriately to maintain serum phosphorus level within ±0.5 mg/dL from the baseline. The primary endpoint was an achievement of at least a 30% decrease in the mean of the total number of PB and tenapanor pills compared to the number of PB pills at baseline. The proportion of patients who achieved at least a 30 % decrease were tested using binomial test with a threshold level of 20% and a one-sided significance level of 0.025. The analysis was conducted using the data as of Dec25, 2019. Results The primary endpoint was met. Of 67 enrolled patients at the timing of analysis, 48 patients (71.6%, [95% CI: 59.3% - 82.0%], p&lt;0.001) achieved a 30% decrease in the total number of PB and tenapanor pills, and of those, 35 patients (52.2%, [95% CI: 39.7% - 64.6%]) achieved a 50% decrease and 18 patients (26.9%) no longer required the use of any PB at week 26. Mean phosphorus levels were maintained during the study from 5.2 mg/dL at the baseline to 4.7 mg/dL at week 26. The most frequent adverse event was diarrhea (76.1%), which was mostly mild to moderate. Only four patients discontinued the study due to diarrhea. Serious adverse events were reported in five patients, only two of which were related to tenapanor (diarrhea and acute myocardial infarction). Conclusion Tenapanor was able to provide phosphorus control with significantly fewer pills compared to PB. AE profile was similar to previous US studies. This result suggests that tenapanor, a non-binder, phosphate absorption inhibitor that provides a novel approach to the management of hyperphosphatemia, could potentially improve drug adherence by reducing PB pill burden while maintaining effective phosphorus control.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document