Faculty Opinions recommendation of The parent perspective: "being a good parent" when making critical decisions in the PICU.

Author(s):  
Janet Wale
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii466-iii467
Author(s):  
Kendra Koch ◽  
Tatum Fettig ◽  
Meghan Slining

Abstract Addressing family needs for social/emotional support is part of the duty of oncology care teams. This research presents a (2020) scoping review and a (2019) focus group initiated to explore pediatric neuro-oncology parent experience of social/emotional support in conjunction with developing an online peer application to address family needs. Currently, the value of online support is in the forefront of clinical conversation. The focus group queried eight parents whose children were under neuro-oncology treatment in the Northwest USA. Thematic findings include—parents want supportive peers who have (1) a personal and deep understanding of parenting a child with serious illness (they “get it”); (2) particular characteristics and skills that promote and sustain relationships, including—(a) good social skills, (b) ability to engage in “balanced” (cancer/non-cancer) conversations, (c) individual similarities (beliefs, age of children, cancer diagnosis/treatment), (d) logistic commonalities (location, availability), (e) pro-social personal characteristics (i.e. sense of humor, emotional/social flexibility), and an (f) ability to navigate and maintain social/emotional boundaries. Parents also initiated discussion about “the burden of supportive relationships” and supporting families doing “normal” activities without worrying about treatment side effects and contagions. The literature review supports finding (1) above; reveals the paucity of evidence-based supports available to this population; underscores the critical need for practitioners and researchers to develop more evidence-based supports and interventions for families of children experiencing cancer; and supports practitioners’ consistently assessing parent and sibling social and emotional needs and then consistently referring or intervening when needs are identified.


1977 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 448-449
Author(s):  
Juliana Townsend Gensley
Keyword(s):  

2007 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie Sarno Owens ◽  
Lauren Richerson ◽  
Caroline E. Murphy ◽  
Anna Jagelewski ◽  
Laura Rossi

2021 ◽  
pp. 019394592098479
Author(s):  
Katherine P. Kelly ◽  
Kathleen A. Knafl ◽  
Susan Keller ◽  
Pamela S. Hinds

We developed and applied metasynthesis methods to expand previously reported thematic descriptions of parents’ internal definition of “being a good parent to my seriously ill child” as part of a larger study to examine parenting of children with serious illness. Our systematic approach included: literature search, purposeful selection of grounded theories regarding parenting a seriously ill child, study summaries, mapping evidence of good parent themes onto structural elements of grounded theory, cross-study comparisons, and theoretical memoing to summarize analytic insights. Twenty-five grounded theory studies from 32 reviewed reports reflected multiple conditions (n=5), countries (n=10) and family members (n=386 families). We report a worked example of the processes used to extend the original good parent themes and detail our processes through one good parent theme. The methods we describe are a promising approach to extend thematic analysis findings and advance thematic expansions toward development of more formal theoretical syntheses.


2007 ◽  
Vol 36 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 179-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie Sarno Owens ◽  
Lauren Richerson ◽  
Caroline E. Murphy ◽  
Anna Jageleweski ◽  
Laura Rossi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document