Faculty Opinions recommendation of The promise of cognitive behavior therapy for treatment of severe mental disorders: a review of recent developments.

Author(s):  
Malcolm Lader
2020 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 100045
Author(s):  
Fredrik Santoft ◽  
Erik Hedman-Lagerlöf ◽  
Sigrid Salomonsson ◽  
Elin Lindsäter ◽  
Brjánn Ljótsson ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-22
Author(s):  
Simon E. Blackwell ◽  
Thomas Heidenreich

AbstractThe early development of cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) can be characterized by the coming together of behavioral and cognitive traditions. However, the past decades have arguably seen more divergences than convergences within the field. The 9th World Congress of Behavioural and Cognitive Therapies was held in Berlin in July 2019 with the congress theme “CBT at the Crossroads.” This title reflected in part the coming together of people from all over the world, but also the fact that recent developments raise important questions about the future of CBT, including whether we can in fact treat it as a unified field. In this paper, we briefly trace the history of CBT, then introduce a special issue featuring a series of articles exploring different aspects of the past, present, and future of CBT. Finally, we reflect on the possible routes ahead.


1987 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 103-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siang-Yang Tan

Cognitive-behavior therapy has gained prominence as a school of psychotherapy or counseling in recent years among secular as well as Christian therapists. This article describes some recent developments and contemporary issues in cognitive-behavior therapy and delineates several limitations and criticisms of cognitive-behavior therapy from both psychological and biblical perspectives. It concludes with some suggestions for a biblical approach to therapy and counseling that is mainly cognitive-behavioral in orientation and practice, but more comprehensive and broad-based than secular cognitive-behavior therapy.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kerstin Denecke ◽  
Nicole Schmid ◽  
Stephan Nüssli

BACKGROUND To address the matter of limited resources for treating persons with mental disorders, eMental health gained in interest in the last years in particular for psychoeducation, or behavior change. Mobile health (mHealth) apps have been suggested as electronic mental health interventions, accompanying cognitive behavior therapy (CBT). OBJECTIVE The current study aims to identify which therapeutic aspects of CBT have been implemented in existing mHealth apps and by which technologies. We want to find out how mHealth apps impact on patients’ agency within healthcare processes. With “enabling” we refer to the enrichment of persons’ repertoire of available healthcare practices and the growth of individual capacity of self-help through the use of mHealth interventions. METHODS Through a literature review we identified studies that studied mHealth apps that implement techniques of CBT. Studies from three databases were screened: PubMed, IEEE Xplore, ACM Digital Library. Data from studies fulfilling the eligibility criteria were extracted and synthesized narratively. From the results of the literature review, we derived which self-help practices of patients with mental disorders are enabled by CBT-based mHealth apps. RESULTS Out of 530 citations retrieved, 34 studies were included in this review. The apps described often support diary keeping, monitoring of mood and behavior or provide exercises and information. Three of the four CBT techniques are integrated in mHealth apps. They enable patients to self-manage and self-monitor their mental state and access relevant information on their disease which helps coping with mental health problems and allows self-treatment. However, the fourth group of CBT techniques, “exposure”, is not realized in mHealth apps. CONCLUSIONS mHealth apps for CBT can shift agency to patients through additional self-help and self-management tools supporting specific, but not all aspects of the treatment. Patients and therapists are not yet enabled sufficiently to identify evidence-based mHealth apps due to missing selection criteria and details on efficacy or data security and privacy. Research on ethical issues and socio-cultural biases of mHealth apps has been identified as desiderata.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document