scholarly journals Faculty Opinions recommendation of Prophylaxis with intrathecal or high-dose methotrexate in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and high risk of CNS relapse.

Author(s):  
Avy Kallam
Author(s):  
Robert Puckrin ◽  
Haidar El Darsa ◽  
Sunita Ghosh ◽  
Anthea Peters ◽  
Carolyn Owen ◽  
...  

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. 2945
Author(s):  
Mélanie Mercier ◽  
Corentin Orvain ◽  
Laurianne Drieu La Rochelle ◽  
Tony Marchand ◽  
Christopher Nunes Gomes ◽  
...  

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with extra nodal skeletal involvement is rare. It is currently unclear whether these lymphomas should be treated in the same manner as those without skeletal involvement. We retrospectively analyzed the impact of combining high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) with an anthracycline-based regimen and rituximab as first-line treatment in a cohort of 93 patients with DLBCL and skeletal involvement with long follow-up. Fifty patients (54%) received upfront HD-MTX for prophylaxis of CNS recurrence (high IPI score and/or epidural involvement) or because of skeletal involvement. After adjusting for age, ECOG, high LDH levels, and type of skeletal involvement, HD-MTX was associated with an improved PFS and OS (HR: 0.2, 95% CI: 0.1–0.3, p < 0.001 and HR: 0.1, 95% CI: 0.04–0.3, p < 0.001, respectively). Patients who received HD-MTX had significantly better 5-year PFS and OS (77% vs. 39%, p <0.001 and 83 vs. 58%, p < 0.001). Radiotherapy was associated with an improved 5-year PFS (74 vs. 48%, p = 0.02), whereas 5-year OS was not significantly different (79% vs. 66%, p = 0.09). A landmark analysis showed that autologous stem cell transplantation was not associated with improved PFS or OS. The combination of high-dose methotrexate and an anthracycline-based immunochemotherapy is associated with an improved outcome in patients with DLBCL and skeletal involvement and should be confirmed in prospective trials.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 29-29
Author(s):  
Mubarak A Almansour ◽  
Saif Saif ◽  
Ziyad Alhrbi ◽  
Abdulrhamn Alhwaity ◽  
Ahmed Almasrahi ◽  
...  

Introduction Central nervous system involvement is uncommon in diffuse large B cell lymphoma but always associated with a poor prognosis. We reviewed the risk of CNS involvement at diagnosis, clinical features, and survival outcome of patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma with CNS involvement. Patients and Methods All patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma from January 2005 to December 2019 at Princess Noorah Oncology Center were retrospectively reviewed. We included patients 15 years old or over, with biopsy-proven diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Patients with HIV disease, double or triple hit lymphomas, or Burkitt's like lymphomas were excluded. CNS involvement was confirmed by clinical, brain imaging, cerebrospinal fluid flow cytometry or biopsy Results A total of 406 patients with DLBCL were identified. The median age was 58 years. The majority of patients had stage III and IV disease (68%) and had more than one site of extranodal involvement (66%). The majority of the patients had intermediate to high IPI (66%) and elevated LDH (67%). A large proportion of patients had high CNS IPI (36%), and a minority of patients received either intravenous prophylaxis high dose methotrexate (11%) or Intrathecal methotrexate (3%). The majority of patients were treated with R-CHOP chemotherapy (92%). In total, 17 (4%) patients had CNS involvement: 9 patients (2.2 %) at diagnosis and 8 (2%) at relapse. All the nine patients who had CNS involvement at diagnosis had advanced-stage disease except one patient. Six patients had another extranodal involvement. Four out of nine patients had a non-germinal center phenotype, and all four patients had parenchymal rather than leptomeningeal involvement. All the patients received R-CHOP chemotherapy alternating with high dose methotrexate except one patient who received palliative treatment. Five out of nine patients achieved CR and survived. For those patients who had CNS relapse, the median time to relapse was 11.8 months (range 6 to 19 months), and most of the patients experienced a relapse in the first 6-13 months. All patients had an advanced stage, extranodal involvement, intermediate to high CNS-IPI, and only two of them received high dose methotrexate, and one patient received radiotherapy. Only two patients are alive: one patient received high dose methotrexate and high dose Ara C followed by high dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant. Another patient received salvage R-ESHAP for systemic relapse alternating with intrathecal MTX and waiting for stem cell transplant. The 5-year overall and progression-free survival rates for the entire DLBCL group were 84% and 73 %, respectively. Conclusion CNS involvement in diffuse large B cell lymphoma carries a poor prognosis. Aggressive CNS-directed therapy should be considered, especially in young fit patients. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4583-4583
Author(s):  
Lisa Y Law ◽  
Mrinal Dutia ◽  
Ryan Stevenson ◽  
Melanie Lau ◽  
Timothy Mok ◽  
...  

Abstract Retrospective review of the safety and efficacy of high-dose methotrexate for prevention of CNS relapse in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma at Kaiser Permanente- Northern California (Jan 2015 - June 2019) Background: Central nervous system (CNS) relapse occurs in 10-12% of high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients. Prophylactic intravenous high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) is recommended by international guidelines to reduce this risk despite limited evidence to support such practice. Recent retrospective studies have cast doubt on the clinical benefit of such treatment. There is limited data on safety and efficacy of such treatment in a community oncology setting. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of adults ≥ 18 years diagnosed with DLBCL treated with systemic therapy and HD-MTX as CNS prophylaxis at Kaiser Permanente Northern California from 1/2015 - 6/2019. We abstracted patient demographics, clinical information, treatment, toxicity, and health care utilization from the electronic health record. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate patients' outcomes. Results: Of 33 patients (median age: 61; range: 23 - 81; age ≥ 60: 57.5%), most had stage IV disease (78.7%) and an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1 (66.5%). Patients with CNS-IPI score of 2-3 (intermediate-risk) was 30.3%, while higher CNS-IPI scores of 4-6 (high-risk) was 51.5%. Other patient characteristics include double hit lymphoma (12.1%), kidney/adrenal gland involvement (33%), and/or epidural involvement (24.2%). Most common therapies were R-CHOP (51.5%) and R-EPOCH (27.2%). The median number of HD-MTX doses was 3 (range 1-4). The median cumulative dose was 7 gm/m2 (range 3-10.5). With regards to the treatment schedule, 63.6% received HD-MTX intercalated with systemic chemotherapy and 36.4% received HD-MTX after completion of preplanned treatment. Overall, renal toxicity was the most common adverse side effect. The rates of grade 1, 2 and 3 renal toxicity were 12.1%, 9% and 6%, respectively. Other notable side effects experienced were neutropenic fever requiring hospitalization (27.2%) and grade 3 transaminitis (6%). No patients experienced grade 3 mucositis. The median duration of hospital stay was 12 days (range 4-37) and 12.1% required suspension of future HD-MTX. With a median follow up of 31.3 months (range: 0.79 - 58.4) 69.6% are alive and 15.1% had CNS relapse despite prophylactic HD-MTX. Conclusions: In this community oncology setting, patients with DLBCL who were deemed high risk for CNS relapse and received HD-MTX for prophylaxis experienced similar CNS relapse rate compared to those who did not in previous studies. Our findings are in line with recent retrospective reviews, which further support the lack of benefit of such prophylactic treatment. This study underscores the need for further research to prevent CNS disease and improved patient selection criteria for prophylactic treatment among high risk DLBCL patients. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document