High-dose Methotrexate and Rituximab Induction Regimen In Immunocompetent Patients With Primary CNS Lymphoma: A Retrospective Single-Center Study of Survival Predictors

Purpose:Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma (PCNSL) is an aggressive tumor that is confined to the CNS. Although the provision of high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) has remarkably improved outcomes in PCNSL patients, the optimal treatment regimens and standard MTX dose have been largely controversial. Herein, we sought to explore the impact of adjuvant Rituximab and different dosages of HD-MTX on survival outcomes of immunocompetent patients with PCNSL.Methods:In this study, we examined patients with PCNSL treated at a single NCI-designated comprehensive cancer center to evaluate their survival outcomes. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 51 immunocompetent patients with PCNSL who received their induction chemotherapy at the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) between 2001 and 2019. Only adult patients with a confirmed diagnosis of PCNSL who had either HD-MTX alone or in combination with Rituximab were included. Patients’ demographics, clinical characteristics, and survival data were collected and analyzed.Results:There is no significant difference in survival among patients who received MTX alone versus MTX plus Rituximab. Furthermore, lower doses of MTX were associated with worse survival outcomes; however, this difference in survival was not significant when adjusted to age.Conclusion:Our experience challenges the role of Rituximab in PCNSL during induction therapy. Our study also highlights the shorter survival in elderly patients with PCNSL which can be related, to some extent, to the relatively lower doses of HD-MTX. There is an unmet need to establish a consensus on the most effective upfront regimen in PCNSL through prospective studies.

Timing of high dose methotrexate CNS prophylaxis in DLBCL: a multicenter international analysis of 1,384 patients

Prophylactic high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) is often used for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients at high risk of central nervous system (CNS) relapse, despite limited evidence demonstrating efficacy or the optimal delivery method. We conducted a retrospective, international analysis of 1,384 patients receiving HD-MTX CNS prophylaxis either intercalated (i-HD-MTX) (n=749) or at the end (n=635) of R-CHOP/R-CHOP-like therapy (EOT). There were 78 CNS relapses (3-year rate 5.7%), with no difference between i-HD-MTX and EOT; 5.7% vs 5.8%, p=0.98, 3-year difference: 0.04% (-2.0% to 3.1%). Conclusions were unchanged on adjusting for baseline prognostic factors or on 6-month landmark analysis (n=1,253). In patients with high CNS international prognostic index (n=600), 3-year CNS relapse rate was 9.1% with no difference between i-HD-MTX and EOT. On multivariable analysis, increasing age and renal/adrenal involvement were the only independent risk factors for CNS relapse. Concurrent intrathecal prophylaxis was not associated with reduction in CNS relapse. R-CHOP delays of ≥7 days were significantly increased with i-HD-MTX versus EOT, with 308/1573 (19.6%) i-HD-MTX treatments resulting in delay to subsequent R-CHOP (median 8 days). Increased risk of delay occurred in older patients when delivery was later than day 10 in the R-CHOP cycle. In summary, we found no evidence that EOT delivery increases CNS relapse risk versus i-HD-MTX. Findings in high-risk subgroups were unchanged. Rates of CNS relapse in this HD-MTX-treated cohort were similar to comparable cohorts receiving infrequent CNS prophylaxis. If HD-MTX is still considered for certain high-risk patients, delivery could be deferred until R-CHOP completion.

Rituximab With High-Dose Methotrexate In Newly Diagnosed Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma: a Single-Center Experience From China

Induction chemotherapy based on high-dose methotrexate is considered as the standard approach for newly diagnosed primary central nervous system lymphomas (PCNSLs). However, the best combination chemotherapeutic regimen remains unclear. This study aimed to determine the efficacy and toxicities of rituximab with methotrexate (R-M regimen). Consecutive 37 Chinese patients receiving R-M regimen as induction chemotherapy were retrospectively identified from January 2015 to June 2020 from our center in eastern China. Fourteen patients receiving rituximab plus methotrexate with cytarabine (R-MA regimen) at the same period were identified as the positive control group. The response rates, survival, toxicities, length of hospital stay (LOS), and cost were compared. Compared with the R-MA regimen, the R-M regimen showed comparable response rate and survival outcomes, but had fewer grade 3-4 hematological toxicities, shorter LOS, lower mean total hospitalization cost and lower mean total antibiotic cost. Overall response after two cycles of chemotherapy, complete remission at the end of induction chemotherapy and ECOG>3 were independent prognostic factors for overall survival. In conclusion, R-M regimen is an effective and well-tolerated combination treatment for PCNSLs, which warrants further evaluation in randomized trials.

Clinical Characteristics and Efficacy of Adalimumab and Low-Dose Methotrexate Combination Therapy in Patients With Vogt–Koyanagi–Harada Disease

This retrospective study investigated the clinical characteristics and efficacy of adalimumab and low-dose methotrexate combination therapy in patients with Vogt–Koyanagi–Harada disease who were treated at Hiroshima University from February 2012 to May 2021. The patients' demographics, clinical features at administration of immunosuppressive therapy, steroid-sparing immunosuppressive therapy, side effects, and relapses were recorded. The efficacies of steroid-sparing immunosuppressive therapy (methotrexate, cyclosporine A, adalimumab, and adalimumab and methotrexate combination therapy) were analyzed. Among 62 patients, the median age at diagnosis was 47 years and the median duration of uveitis was 51 months. Systemic corticosteroid therapy was administered to 93.5% of patients (n = 58). Thirty-four patients (54.8%) were treated with steroid-sparing immunosuppressive therapy. Methotrexate and cyclosporine A were administered to 12 and 22 patients, respectively; relapse occurred in 50.0% and 22.7% of the patients, respectively. Discontinuation of cyclosporine A was required in 63.6% of patients because of side effects. Adalimumab was administered to 14 patients. Recurrence occurred in 11 patients, requiring methotrexate concomitantly. The mean dose of methotrexate at inflammatory quiescence after side effect-related dose decrease was 8.0 mg/week (0.13 mg/kg). The median duration of combination therapy without recurrence was 20 months. There were no serious adverse events during adalimumab therapy. A high relapse rate was observed in patients receiving methotrexate; a high rate of side effects requiring discontinuation was observed in patients receiving Cyclosporine A. Patients with late-stage Vogt–Koyanagi–Harada disease may achieve better control with adalimumab and methotrexate combination therapy.

Retrospective evaluation of sodium acetate use for urine alkalinization in patients receiving high dose methotrexate

Purpose Methotrexate is an antifolate agent used in treatment of several malignancies. Many toxicities accompany methotrexate that are minimized with urine alkalinization. Parenteral sodium bicarbonate is the historical standard alkalinizing agent, but use has been limited by intermittent shortages. However, intravenous sodium acetate may be considered as a chemically equivalent alternative. The primary objective of this study is to determine the efficacy of sodium acetate versus sodium bicarbonate for urine alkalinization for high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX). Methods This is a retrospective cohort study including adults admitted to Barnes-Jewish Hospital to receive HDMTX for lymphoma, breast cancer with leptomeningial spread, or osteosarcoma. Patients must have received intravenous sodium acetate or sodium bicarbonate alkalinization. Results Of 192 HDMTX encounters, 154 (sodium bicarbonate, n = 86; sodium acetate, n = 68) were evaluated for efficacy and safety. Safety outcomes were not significantly different between groups except for higher peak methotrexate level in the bicarbonate group (2.9 mcmol/L vs. 1.7 mcmol/L, p = 0.023), and increased incidence of grade 3–4 ALT in the sodium bicarbonate group (23.5% vs. 9%, p = 0.02). Time from alkalinizer initiation to pH ≥7 was significantly shorter with sodium bicarbonate (4 vs. 5.15 h, p = 0.021). Nonetheless, outcomes such as length of stay (4.4 vs. 4 days respectively, p = 0.037) and time to methotrexate clearance (3.6 vs. 3.2 days respectively, p = 0.023) reveal that inpatient time was shorter with sodium acetate overall. Conclusion This retrospective analysis suggests that sodium acetate has similar efficacy and safety to sodium bicarbonate for alkalinization and may be considered as an alternative in future shortage situations.