Faculty Opinions recommendation of Inbreeding depression increases with environmental stress: an experimental study and meta-analysis.

Author(s):  
Ary Hoffmann
2016 ◽  
Vol 46 (10) ◽  
pp. 2015-2023 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. Mothersill ◽  
G. Donohoe

BackgroundSocial environmental stress, including childhood abuse and deprivation, is associated with increased rates of psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia and depression. However, the neural mechanisms mediating risk are not completely understood. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies have reported effects of social environmental stress on a variety of brain regions, but interpretation of results is complicated by the variety of environmental risk factors examined and different methods employed.MethodWe examined brain regions consistently showing differences in blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) response in individuals exposed to higher levels of environmental stress by performing a coordinate-based meta-analysis on 54 functional MRI studies using activation likelihood estimation (ALE), including an overall sample of 3044 participants. We performed separate ALE analyses on studies examining adults (mean age ⩾18 years) and children/adolescents (mean age <18 years) and a contrast analysis comparing the two types of study.ResultsAcross both adult and children/adolescent studies, ALE meta-analysis revealed several clusters in which differences in BOLD response were associated with social environmental stress across multiple studies. These clusters incorporated several brain regions, among which the right amygdala was most frequently implicated.ConclusionsThese findings suggest that a variety of social environmental stressors is associated with differences in the BOLD response of specific brain regions such as the right amygdala in both children/adolescents and adults. What remains unknown is whether these environmental stressors have differential effects on treatment response in these brain regions.


2011 ◽  
Vol 72 (3) ◽  
pp. 256-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yann-Jinn Lee ◽  
Chi-Yu Huang ◽  
Wei-Hsin Ting ◽  
Hung-Chang Lee ◽  
Wen-Ling Guo ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 219256822110653
Author(s):  
Gustav Ø. Andersen ◽  
Stefan Milosevic ◽  
Mads M. Jensen ◽  
Mikkel Ø. Andersen ◽  
Ane Simony ◽  
...  

Study design Systematic Review Objective To evaluate the efficacy of available treatment options for patients with persistent coccydynia through a systematic review. Methods Original peer-reviewed publications on treatment for coccydynia were identified using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines by performing a literature search of relevant databases, from their inception to January 17, 2020, combined with other sources. Data on extracted treatment outcome was pooled based on treatment categories to allow for meta-analysis. All outcomes relevant to the treatment efficacy of coccydynia were extracted. No single measure of outcome was consistently present among the included studies. Numeric Rating Scale, (NRS, 0–10) for pain was used as the primary outcome measure. Studies with treatment outcome on adult patients with chronic primary coccydynia were considered eligible. Results A total of 1980 patients across 64 studies were identified: five randomized controlled trials, one experimental study, one quasi-experimental study, 11 prospective observational studies, 45 retrospective studies and unpublished data from the DaneSpine registry. The greatest improvement in pain was achieved by patients who underwent radiofrequency therapy (RFT, mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) decreased by 5.11 cm). A similar mean improvement was achieved from Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy (ESWT, 5.06), Coccygectomy (4.86) and Injection (4.22). Although improved, the mean change was less for those who received Ganglion block (2.98), Stretching/Manipulation (2.19) and Conservative/Usual Care (1.69). Conclusion This study highlights the progressive nature of treatment for coccydynia, starting with noninvasive methods before considering coccygectomy. Non-surgical management provides pain relief for many patients. Coccygectomy is by far the most thoroughly investigated treatment option and may be beneficial for refractory cases. Future randomized controlled trials should be conducted with an aim to compare the efficacy of interventional therapies amongst each other and to coccygectomy.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kendall K. Beals ◽  
Jessica A. M. Moore ◽  
Stephanie N. Kivlin ◽  
Shannon L. J. Bayliss ◽  
Candice Y. Lumibao ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document