A GLOBAL ASSESSMENT OF THE IMPLEMENTATION LEVELS OF THE EDUCATION FOR ALL (EFA) INITIATIVE AND THE MILLENNIUM DEVELOPMENT GOALS (MDGs) ON EDUCATION IN SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA: A FOCUS ON NIGERIA

2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 14
Author(s):  
C. N. Musa ◽  
Jennifer J. Agbaire

This paper presents an analytical appraisal of the varying levels to which the Education for All (EFA) project linked with two of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) has been implemented in sub-Saharan Africa with particular focus on Nigeria. It draws attention to the inequities among countries of the region while generally assessing Nigeria’s prospects in the achievement o f the EFA goals. The paper begins by highlighting the goals of the EFA project which include expanding and improving comprehensive early childhood care and education, especially for the most vulnerable and disadvantaged children and the educational MDGs by 2015 and the MDGs while aligning them with Nigeria’s policies on education. It then proceeds to examine advances made in implementing EFA goals such as the expansion of Early Childhood Care and Education and challenges in Nigeria and sub-Saharan Africa. Finally, practical strategies, geared at improving the achievement potential of the region in general and the country, in particular, are recommended. To this end, making practical plans to fund and manage all levels of education so that they can be accessible to all children regardless of socio-economic background and location was strongly advocated.

Policy Papers ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 2005 (72) ◽  
Author(s):  

Our meeting takes place at an important juncture in the international community’s efforts towards achieving the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). It is now five years since we took up this enormous challenge, and there is a sense of renewed urgency. The recent UN World Summit on Implementing the Millennium Declaration reaffirmed the commitments made in Monterrey, but stressed the need for more progress, particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa. In addition, at the African Union and G-8 Summits, African leaders and their counterparts in the G-8 committed themselves to intensify their efforts.


2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 200-217 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret Lombe ◽  
Najwa S. Safadi ◽  
Scune Carrington ◽  
Harriet Mabikke ◽  
Yande Lombe

World Economy ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 29 (11) ◽  
pp. 1519-1547 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre-Richard Agénor ◽  
Nihal Bayraktar ◽  
Emmanuel Pinto Moreira ◽  
Karim El Aynaoui

2013 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 451-467 ◽  
Author(s):  
CHRISTIAN MORABITO ◽  
MICHEL VANDENBROECK ◽  
RUDI ROOSE

AbstractThere is a large consensus among international organisations (e.g., United Nations and the World Bank) in considering Early Childhood Care and Education a prominent policy to equalise opportunities. Moreover, it is common opinion that interventions in early childhood aiming at equalising ‘opportunities’ rather than ‘outcomes’ will overcome political dissent. These two claims draw upon a particular interpretation of the work of contemporary egalitarian philosophers, as well as a number of studies in both developed and developing countries, finding higher benefits for disadvantaged children. Despite the tradition of analysing welfare provision from an equality perspective, the shift towards early childhood education as an equality policy has not yet fully been analysed. We critically examine the consensus advocated by international organisations regarding Early Childhood Care and Education as key to ‘levelling the playing field’ and suggest that the first claim (early childhood as greatest equaliser) should be considered with caution. We also argue that the alleged consensus on this claim may lead to a depoliticisation of social policy.


Author(s):  
Herman Van der Elst

Despite isolated progress there seems to be no clear-cut guideline or solution to the collective eradication of extreme poverty in sub-Saharan Africa. In an attempt to overcome the above reality, the objective of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) is short term poverty relief to the poorest of the poor by 2015. This is to be achieved through the realisation of eight pro-poor objectives. Since 2000 there has been notable progress. Developmental organisations such as the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the Freedom House Index project that global poverty will have been reduced to below fifteen per cent by 2015. The MDGs can, however, currently only be perceived as partially effective because poverty relief remains restricted to mainly Latin America and South and South East Asia. This partial success is substantiated by the reality that the majority of states in sub-Saharan Africa remains subjected to a cycle of extreme poverty, which seems impossible to overcome. There is consensus amongst many researchers that none of the MDGs will be achieved in this region by 2015.This article aims to critically analyse the nature, objectives and progress of the MDGs as a global developmental paradigm shift. In order to explore future trends and identify potential solutions, an emphasis is, however, placed on the possible reasons for the slow progress of the MDGs, specifically in sub-Saharan Africa.Keywords: Global paradigm shift, new conditionality, extreme poverty, poverty eradication, sub-Saharan Africa, foreign aid, deprivation hypothesis, weak governance, free-market approach and the poverty trapDisciplines: International relations, law, political economy, politics, environmental studies, water studies, communication studies, public management and governance, education, sociology, anthropology and history. 


2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre-Richard Agenor ◽  
Nihal Bayraktar ◽  
Emmanuel Pinto Pinto Moreira ◽  
Karim El Aynaoui

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document