Transformational Leadership vs Change Self-Efficacy and Its Impact on Affective Commitment to Change

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 13-18
Author(s):  
Denvi Giovanita ◽  
Wustari L. Mangundjaya
Keyword(s):  
Transformational Leadership ◽  
Organizational Change ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Affective Commitment ◽  
Organizational Factors ◽  
Jel Classification ◽  
Commitment To Change ◽  
Two Factors ◽  
Result Show ◽  
Leadership And Change

Objective - It is essential for organizations in 21st century to evolve with time. In this regard, both the management and employees of an organization play an essential role in the implementation of change. One way of determining the success of organizational change is by identifying the employees' commitment to change. This research aims to identify the effect of transformational leadership (organizational factors) and employees' change self-efficacy (individual factors) on effective commitment to change, to identify which of those two factors has a more significant effect on affective commitment to change. Methodology/Technique - The respondents of this study are employees in the finance sector. The data was collected using commitment to change, change self-efficacy and transformational leadership inventories. The data was analyzed using multiple hierarchical regressions. Findings – The result show that both transformational leadership and change self-efficacy have a positive and significant effect on affective commitment to change. Furthermore, change self-efficacy proved to have a more significant effect on affective commitment to change compared to transformational leadership. Based on these results, organisations may wish to further focus on the development of change self-efficacy of individuals. Novelty - This study can be used by HR practitioners when dealing with organizational change, as a guide to improving the success of such change. Type of Paper - Empirical. Keywords: Affective Commitment to Change; Change Self-Efficacy; Leadership; Organizational Change; Transformational Leadership. JEL Classification: M10, M19.

Employee Voice, Employee Involvement, and Organizational Change Readiness: Mediating Role of Commitment-to-Change and Moderating Role of Transformational Leadership

2021 ◽  
pp. 227853372110439
Author(s):  
Rama Krishna Gupta Potnuru ◽  
Rohini Sharma ◽  
Chandan Kumar Sahoo
Keyword(s):  
Transformational Leadership ◽  
Organizational Change ◽  
Employee Involvement ◽  
Change Readiness ◽  
Employee Voice ◽  
Equation Modeling ◽  
Commitment To Change ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Moderating Role

This study explores the antecedents for organizational change readiness for altering the status quo and empirically validates few potent tools which facilitate change. By drawing on change management literature, this study examines the influence of employee voice (EV) and employee involvement (EI) on commitment-to-change (CTC), considering the latter as a mediating variable in the relation between antecedent human resources practices (EV and EI) and organizational change readiness (OCR). Subsequently, the moderating role of transformational leadership was analyzed on these posited relationships. The hypotheses proposed in the research model are tested on a sample of 516 employees from an Indian public sector organization, applying Baron and Kenny’s (1986) technique for establishing mediation and Ping’s approach to moderated structured equation modeling for moderation. The findings suggest that CTC partially mediates the relationship between EV and OCR, but it does not mediate between EI and OCR. Likewise, the study results also empirically validate that the relationship between EV and CTC is enhanced if leadership is transformational, also the hypothesis positing the moderating role of transformational leadership between EI and CTC was supported.

Transformational Leadership and Employees’ Reactions to Organizational Change: Evidence From a Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
pp. 002188632092036
Author(s):  
Jian Peng ◽  
Mingze Li ◽  
Zhen Wang ◽  
Yuying Lin
Keyword(s):  
Transformational Leadership ◽  
Organizational Change ◽  
Cultural Context ◽  
Resistance To Change ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Readiness For Change ◽  
Independent Effect ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Commitment To Change ◽  
Openness To Change

Numerous studies have empirically tested the linkage between transformational leadership and employees’ reactions to organizational change. However, no systematic attempt has been made to organize and summarize those findings. Based on a sample of 30 empirical studies that included 39 independent effect sizes and 12,240 participants, this meta-analysis found that transformational leadership exhibited (a) a positive relationship with commitment to change, openness to change, and readiness for change; (b) a negative correlation with resistance to change and cynicism about change; and (c) a nonsignificant correlation with support for change. Moderation analyses showed that in cross-sectional (vs. longitudinal) designs, transformational leadership exhibited a stronger correlation with openness to change and cynicism about change. Using Bass and Avolio’s scale (vs. Podsakoff et al.’s), transformational leadership exhibited a stronger correlation with resistance to change. In the Eastern (vs. Western) cultural context, transformational leadership exhibited a stronger correlation with commitment to change and resistance to change. In low-level (vs. high-level) journals, transformational leadership exhibited a stronger correlation with commitment to change, openness to change, and support for change. This study highlights the value of incorporating transformational leadership theory into the literature on change reactions to obtain a better understanding of how leaders facilitate or hinder organizational change.

scholarly journals Employee Commitment to Organizational Change with the Role of Job Satisfaction and Transformational Leadership

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 1-17
Author(s):  
Nguyen Thi Bich Thuy ◽  
Phan Dang Ngoc Yen Van
Keyword(s):  
Job Satisfaction ◽  
Transformational Leadership ◽  
Organizational Change ◽  
Affective Commitment ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Normative Commitment ◽  
Continuance Commitment ◽  
Survey Sample ◽  
Transformation Leadership

This study aimed to analyze the role of job satisfaction and transformation leadership for employees’ commitment to organizational change. Based on a survey sample of 381 employees in post-merger enterprises in retail and pharmaceutical sector and a linear regression model. The results revealed that Transformational leadership was associated positively and significantly with Affective Commitment (β = .42, p < .000), Normative Commitment (β = .32, p < .000), and Continuance Commitment (β = .27, p < .000); Job satisfaction was associated positively and significantly with Affective Commitment (β = .24, p < .000) and Normative Commitment (β = .30, p < .000) among employees’ to organizational change. The results of this study provide a foundation of theory and practice for organizational changes that can efficiently exploit the human resource for the development in the next period.

scholarly journals The influence of transformational leadership dimensions on intrapreneurial behaviour through mediators

2021 ◽  
pp. 2099-2114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thi Thuy Giang Huynh
Keyword(s):  
Job Satisfaction ◽  
Transformational Leadership ◽  
Organizational Change ◽  
Structural Equation ◽  
Affective Commitment ◽  
Equation Model ◽  
Intellectual Stimulation ◽  
Strategic Renewal ◽  
Mediating Role ◽  
Leadership Dimensions

The present study aimed to examine the direct impact of transformational leadership dimensions on employee strategic renewal behaviour and venture behaviour, and through a mediating role of job satisfaction and employee commitment to organizational change. The study sample consisted of 464 employees in different firm types in Ho Chi Minh city of Vietnam. The data is analysed using a structural equation model (SEM). The paper shows that dimensions of transformational leadership (namely intellectual stimulation, inspirational motivation, and individual consideration) have positive and significant influence employee strategic renewal behaviour and venture behaviour directly, and via job satisfaction and commitment to organizational change (affective commitment and normative commitment) as a moderating mechanism.

scholarly journals The Impact of Psychological Capital and Psychological Empowerment on Employee's Affective Commitment to Change

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 09-14
Author(s):  
Muthmainah Mufidah ◽  
Wustari L. Mangundjaya
Keyword(s):  
Financial Institutions ◽  
Affective Commitment ◽  
Psychological Capital ◽  
Psychological Empowerment ◽  
External Environment ◽  
Jel Classification ◽  
Organizational Changes ◽  
Commitment To Change ◽  
Managing Change ◽  
The Impact

Objective - Organizations nowadays have to change and adjust themselves with the changing external environment in order to survive in the globalization era. This change requires a high affective commitment to change from its employees. The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of psychological capital and psychological empowerment on employee's affective commitment to change. Methodology/Technique - Respondents were 242 employees of Indonesian financial institutions which have undergone organizational changes. Data collection tools were Commitment to Change Inventory, Psychological Empowerment, and Psychological Capital, and was analysed using regression analysis. Findings - Findings indicated that a positive and significant impact of psychological capital and psychological empowerment on affective commitment to change. This study also found that psychological capital has a more significant influence on affective commitment to change than psychological empowerment. Research limitations/implications - The implications of the study can be used for managing change better, such as developing confidence in people by developing both psychological empowerment and psychological capital. Originality/value - Results are essential for managing change better, such as developing confidence in people by promoting both psychological empowerment and psychological capital. Type of Paper - Empirical Keywords: Affective Commitment to Change; Psychological Capital; Psychological Empowerment; Organizational Change; Financial Institutions. JEL Classification: G23.

Role Conflict as Mediator Between Transformational Leadership and Change-Related Outcomes

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 99-110
Author(s):  
Tim Brouns ◽  
Roxane Rexin ◽  
Kai Externbrink
Keyword(s):  
Transformational Leadership ◽  
Role Conflict ◽  
Structural Equation ◽  
Affective Commitment ◽  
Role Theory ◽  
Equation Modeling ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Commitment To Change ◽  
Psychological Mechanisms ◽  
The Relationship

The purpose of the paper is to contribute to the inner workings of transformational leadership in the context of organizational change. According to the organizational role theory, role conflict is proposed as a mediator between transformational leadership and affective commitment to change and irritation. Cross-sectional data were collected in a German company in the textiles sector, undergoing a pervasive IT-related change. Confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling was performed for validity and hypothesis testing. The findings suggest that role conflict acts as a full mediator in the relationship between transformational leadership and affective commitment to change, as well as irritation. Transformational leadership is often discussed in terms of change-oriented leadership. Surprisingly, only a few studies have examined the specific impact of transformational leadership on attitudinal outcomes during change processes, yet. Consequently, research on the underlying psychological mechanisms of the relationship is scarce, too.

How and When job Security Reduces Resistance to Change in the Context of Organizational Change

2021 ◽  
pp. 002188632110406
Author(s):  
Cailing Feng ◽  
Brian Cooper ◽  
Cherrie Jiuhua Zhu
Keyword(s):  
Organizational Change ◽  
Change Process ◽  
Affective Commitment ◽  
Resistance To Change ◽  
Eastern China ◽  
Job Security ◽  
Conservation Of Resources ◽  
Process Data ◽  
Commitment To Change ◽  
The Relationship

Drawing on conservation of resources theory, this study highlights why and when job security may decrease resistance to change during the organizational change process. Data were collected from 23 subsidiaries in a large manufacturing group enterprise based in a coastal city in eastern China. A three-wave design was used to mirror the different stages in the change process, valid data were received from 469 employees and 86 supervisors. Results showed that job security was negatively related to resistance to change, and this effect was mediated through affective commitment to change. We also found that procedural justice plays a moderating role in the relationship between job security and affective commitment to change and that environmental uncertainty also moderates the relationship between affective commitment to change and resistance to change. This study is quite timely and would have the potential to benefit the practice of change management in organizations.

Self-efficacy as a resource: a moderated mediation model of transformational leadership, extent of change and reactions to change

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 301-317 ◽  
Author(s):  
Secil Bayraktar ◽  
Alfredo Jiménez
Keyword(s):  
Transformational Leadership ◽  
Organizational Change ◽  
Leadership Style ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Moderated Mediation ◽  
Conservation Of Resources ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Reactions To Change ◽  
The Impact ◽  
The Relationship

PurposeDrawing from conservation of resources (COR) theory, this study empirically tests the impact of transformational leadership on commitment to and intention to support organizational change, proposing self-efficacy as a mediating mechanism. This study also aims to study whether the extent of change in the organization moderates the proposed relationship between transformational leadership, self-efficacy and change reactions.Design/methodology/approachA survey was conducted with a sample of 298 employees going through a major organizational change. The proposed moderated mediation relationship was tested by using PROCESS macro.FindingsThe findings showed that self-efficacy mediated the relationship between transformational leadership and reactions to change. Moreover, the extent of changes experienced by the employees moderated the relationship between self-efficacy and outcome variables. In other words, in high change contexts, self-efficacy appeared as a more salient and instrumental resource leading to positive reactions.Practical implicationsThe results guide change managers to display a transformational leadership style to enhance self-efficacy of change recipients to generate positive attitudes and behaviors during change. Also, this study shows that self-efficacy particularly gains importance when the extent of change is high.Originality/valueThis study makes several important contributions to the organizational change literature. First, it shows that leaders play a crucial role in generating resources that enhance employees' positive reactions to change. Second, the conditional factor of the extent of change has not received much attention in the literature. This study raises attention to the fact that the importance of such resources may differ across low versus high extent of change contexts.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document