scholarly journals Tumescent local anesthesia as an alternative to general anesthesia in release of post-burn neck contracture and skin graft harvesting: A comparative study

2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mukesh Kumar Prasad ◽  
Payal Jain ◽  
Rohit Kumar Varshney ◽  
Aditi Khare ◽  
Gurdeep Singh Jheetay
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Local Anesthesia ◽  
Skin Graft ◽  
Tumescent Local Anesthesia ◽  
Graft Harvest ◽  
Contracture Release ◽  
Split Skin

Background: Anesthetic management of severe post burn neck contracture is difficult, demanding due to fixed flexion deformity of neck, incomplete oral occlusion and insufficient mouth opening leading to difficulty in intubation. Patients undergoing contracture release, skin graft harvest under general anesthesia (GA) were compared with patients undergoing the same surgery under tumescent local anesthesia (TLA) technique. Methodology: Twenty-one patients with post burn neck contracture undergoing contracture release with split skin grafting under GA were compared with twenty-one patients undergoing the same surgery under TLA. Post-operative pain and satisfaction were assessed using 10 cm VAS (Visual Analogue Scale).  Results: Demographic profile was comparable in both groups. Changes in intra-operative vital parameters remained insignificant. The average volume of tumescent solution used was 254.76 + 49.05ml. Blood loss was significantly decreased, postoperative pain relief was more than sixteen hours in thirteen patients and extended beyond twenty-four hours in six patients in the TLA group. Time for the first rescue analgesia was significantly lesser in the GA group and the average dose of injection tramadol used in the GA group was significantly higher within the first 24 h. Overall satisfaction in the TLA group was significantly higher than in the GA group. Conclusion: TLA can be used as sole technique for release of post burn neck contracture and harvest of split skin grafts with less blood loss and significantly better postoperative pain relief avoiding complications of general anesthesia. Key words: Tumescent local anesthesia; Post burn neck contracture; Skin graft harvest; General anesthesia Citation: Prasad MK, Jain P, Varshney RK, Khare A, Jheetay GS. Tumescent local anesthesia as an alternative to general anesthesia in the release of post-burn neck contracture and skin graft harvesting: A comparative study. Anaesth. Pain intensive care 2021;25(1):34–39. DOI: 10.35975/apic.v25i1.1434 Received: 18 February 2020, Reviewed: 16 March 2020, Accepted: 30 April 2020

scholarly journals EMLA- AN EFFECTIVE TOOL FOR TOPICAL ANALGESIA IN SPLIT SKIN GRAFT HARVEST

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Lalit Agrawal ◽  
Fahud Khurram ◽  
Naveen Khubchandani
Keyword(s):  
Visual Analogue Scale ◽  
Skin Graft ◽  
Analogue Scale ◽  
Skin Grafting ◽  
Split Skin Graft ◽  
Emla Cream ◽  
Graft Harvest ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Split Skin ◽  
Group 1

Background: Many patients require general anesthesia merely for skin grafting. EMLA cream which is aeutectic mixture of Lignocaine and Prilocaine provides surface anesthesia when applied on intact skin. Its role in venepuncture or IV cannula insertion in children is well documented. Aim and Objective: To compare effectiveness of EMLA over inltrative local anaesthesia in split skin graft harvest. Method: A prospective study was conducted on 64 patients who required skin grafting. Various indications for grafting were noted. The patients were randomly allocated to two groups. In one group 32 patients, graft was harvested after application of EMLA cream whereas in another group of 32 patients, graft was harvested by inltrating local anesthesia. Pain perceived during donor area preparation, graft harvesting and post-operative pain was recorded and compared between the two groups on Visual analogue scale and Likert scale. Results: Total 64 patients were included in the study with 32 patients in either group. Traumatic loss of skin was the most common indication in either group for skin graft harvest. As per visual analogue scale during the graft harvest, most of the patients were in the range of 4-7 score in either group (71.87% vs 53.12%). 75% of the patients were in the 4-7 score in both groups. As per likert scale during the graft harvest score of 4 was noted in 62.5% in group 1 vs 53.12% in group 2 patients. 81.25% patients in group 1 reported procedure as excellent versus 53.12% patients in group 2. Patients experienced more pain during inltration of local anesthesia. Whereas more bleeding was noted in EMLA group immediately after harvest of graft. Conclusions: EMLA cream can be effectively used as an alternative to local anaesthetic inltration for harvest of split thickness skin graft

scholarly journals Local infiltration anesthesia by the creeping infiltrate method

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 569-577
Author(s):  
А. А. Vishnevsky
Keyword(s):  
Pain Relief ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Local Anesthesia ◽  
Local Infiltration ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Local Infiltration Anesthesia ◽  
Infiltration Anesthesia

In modern surgery, there are a large number of different types of general anesthesia and local anesthesia. This most clearly indicates that there is still no such method of pain relief that could be completely satisfied.

scholarly journals Advantages of Tonsillectomy done under Local Anesthesia compared to General Anesthesia in Adults

2013 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sudhir Naik ◽  
Sarika S Naik ◽  
S Ravishankara ◽  
Mohan K Appaji ◽  
MK Goutham ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Local Anesthesia ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Limited Resources ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Head Neck

ABSTRACT Background/Objectives Tonsillectomy using local anesthesia (local tonsillectomy) is a safe and effective alternative to general anesthesia in the healthy cooperative teenage or adult patients. Blood loss, morbidity, complications and patient satisfaction were better in some studies with tonsillectomies done under general anesthesia. Design Comparative case series analysis study of two groups of patients who underwent tonsillectomies under local and general anesthesia during the study period of 57 months from March 2007 to December 2011. Materials and methods Overall 1,349 cases of tonsillectomies done for chronic tonsillitis were included under the study. Three hundred and sixty-seven cases operated under general anesthesia and 982 cases operated under local anesthesia were compared. The parameters compared were duration of surgery, blood loss and the mean pain visual analog score. Results Significant difference in duration of surgery, blood loss during surgery and visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores were seen in the two groups with local anesthesia scoring over general anesthesia. Conclusion Tonsillectomy under local anesthesia is a good alternate for the procedure under general anesthesia with limited resources and in cooperative adults. How to cite this article Naik SM, Naik SS, Ravishankara S, Appaji MK, Goutham MK, Devi NP, Mushannavar AS. Advantages of Tonsillectomy done under Local Anesthesia compared to General Anesthesia in Adults. Int J Head Neck Surg 2013;4(1):13-18.

scholarly journals Preemptive Analgesia in Thumb Basal Joint Arthroplasty: Immediate Postoperative Pain with Preincision versus Postincision Local Anesthesia

2017 ◽  
Vol 09 (02) ◽  
pp. 080-083 ◽  
Author(s):  
Asif Ilyas ◽  
Joseph Labrum
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Local Anesthesia ◽  
Joint Arthroplasty ◽  
Opioid Consumption ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Pain Experience ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Basal Joint

Purpose Currently no guidelines exist for the timing of the injection of anesthetics in surgeries performed under general anesthesia to minimize postoperative pain. To better understand the role of timing of the injection of local anesthesia in hand surgery performed under general anesthesia, we evaluated the effect of pre- versus postincisional local analgesic injection on immediate postoperative pain experience. We hypothesize that the preincisional (preemptive) injection will result in decreased immediate postoperative pain experience and analgesic use when compared with postincisional injection. Methods Consecutive cases of thumb basal joint arthroplasty performed over a 4-year period were retrospectively reviewed. During the first half of the study period, the surgical site was infiltrated with 0.5% bupivacaine at the completion of surgery following closure. During the second half of the study period, the surgical site was infiltrated with 0.5% bupivacaine prior to skin incision. Data collected included patient demographics, immediate postoperative recovery room (PACU) pain scores, and postoperative opioid consumption in morphine equivalents. Results Two-tailed t-test identified no significant difference between the pre- and postincision cohorts relative to PACU entrance pain scores and time spent in the PACU. PACU exit pain scores were significantly lower in the preincision cohort. The mean PACU pain score was also significantly lower in the preincision cohort. PACU opioid consumption, converted into morphine equivalents, was found to be 211 mg in the preincision versus 299 mg in the postincision cohort. Conclusion The preincisional (preemptive) injection of local anesthesia was found to result in lower pain scores during and upon exit of the PACU as compared with the postclosure group. In addition, the preincision cohort also trended toward lower opioid consumption while in the PACU. Consideration should be given to the routine use of preincision injection of local anesthesia to maximize pain relief in a multimodal pain strategy in hand surgical patients. Level of Evidence Therapeutic level III.

The Tumescent Technique for Lipo-Suction Surgery

1987 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 263-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey A. Klein
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Local Anesthesia ◽  
Large Volume ◽  
Subcutaneous Fat ◽  
Tumescent Technique ◽  
Intravenous Line ◽  
Anesthetic Solution

The tumescent technique of lipo-suction is a modification of the wet technique. A large volume of very dilute epinephrine is infiltrated into a targeted fat compartment prior to lipo-suction, producing a swelling and firmness. This tumescence of fat permits an increased accuracy in lipo-suction and minimizes postsurgical irregularities or rippling of the skin. Epinephrine-induced vasoconstriction minimizes blood loss, bruising, and postoperative soreness. Safe, rapid infiltration of large volumes of solution is achieved using a closed sterile system featuring a newly designed blunt-tipped, 30-cm-long, 4.7-mm-diameter needle having a hollow handle that accommodates a 60-cc syringe. Attached to a liter bottle of anesthetic solution by an intravenous line, the needle is inserted via the same incision and deposits the solution along the same path as that intended for the lipo-suction cannula. Thus, the solution is infiltrated exactly where it is needed for hemostasis or local anesthesia. Used in conjunction with general anesthesia, the tumescent technique saves time in achieving maximal vasoconstriction of the targeted fat compartment. If dilute lidocaine (0.1%) is added to the solution, the technique permits lipo-suction of more than 2 liters of fat totally by local anesthesia. Twenty-six patients, having received a mean lidocaine dose of 1250 mg (18.4 mg/kg or 8.5 mg/kg/hr) infiltrated into subcutaneous fat, had a mean serum lidocaine level of less than 0.36 μg/ml 1 hour after completion of the infiltration.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document