SHORT TERM OUTCOMES OF A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS BETWEEN LOCAL ANESTHETIC WOUND INFILTRATION AND REGIONAL ANESTHESIA IN BREAST SURGERY: SHOULD WE OPT FOR A SELECTIVE APPROACH?

2021 ◽  
pp. 125-131
Author(s):  
Pasupathy Kiruparan ◽  
Charef Raslan ◽  
Yuet NG ◽  
David Archampong ◽  
Debasish Debnath

Background: Full short-term effects of regional anesthesia in breast surgery is not well known. We aimed to assess any differences in the short-term outcomes of regional block and local anesthetic (LA) wound inltration in breast surgery. Materials and methods: A prospective non-randomized observational study of elective breast surgical procedures between 01/06/2018 and 28/02/3019 was performed at a district general hospital in the North-West England. Data comprised of patientand procedure-specic demographics, relevant health conditions, pain scale, blood pressure, analgesia requirement, Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV) score and Length of stay (LoS). Operations were classed as minor/ moderate and major. Regional anesthesia (RA) comprised of paravertebral, intercostal, pectoral and serratus blocks. Results: A total of 143 events (regional anesthesia, n=58; LA wound inltration, n=85) were analysed. Reduced pain score and longer anesthetic time were noted in the regional anesthesia group (p<0.001). A trend of reduced strong opioid requirement was also noted in the major procedure group receiving regional anesthesia. PONV scale was higher in the major surgery groups, signicantly so in the LA group (p<0.001). No signicant association was noted with various past medical histories, and LoS. A signicant increase in occurrence of wound-site haematoma (5.6%) along with per-operative hypotension was noted in the paravertebral block group. Levo-Bupivacaine was associated with least overall opioid requirement (p=0.01). Conclusions: A selective approach to provide regional anesthesia using Levo-Bupivacaine in major breast cases, irrespective of common health conditions, would likely to result in reduced pain score and opioid requirements, and offset the longer anesthetic time. Association between haematoma formation and paravertebral block merits further larger study. Plain Language Summary Ÿ Regional anesthesia in breast surgery warrants specialist skill, extra time and has potential side effects as well as benets. Ÿ Short term benets of regional anesthesia in breast surgery were assessed in this non-randomized study in comparison to traditional local anesthetic wound inltration. Ÿ Most benets, in terms of improved pain score and reduced morphine requirements, were noted in association with regional anesthesia using Levo-Bupivacaine in major breast cases. This would allow a selective approach whilst planning for most effective anesthetic and analgesic effect in breast surgery. Ÿ Higher occurrence of post-operative wound haematoma was noted mostly in association with paravertebral block, the particular type of regional anesthesia where drop of blood pressure was also signicant. Further study would help clarify the signicance of these ndings.

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (10) ◽  
pp. 813-817
Author(s):  
Adam D Niesen ◽  
Adam K Jacob ◽  
Luke A Law ◽  
Hans P Sviggum ◽  
Rebecca L Johnson

Background and objectivesThoracic paravertebral blockade is often used as an anesthetic and/or analgesic technique for breast surgery. With ultrasound guidance, the rate of complications is speculated to be lower than when using landmark-based techniques. This investigation aimed to quantify the incidence of pleural puncture and pneumothorax following non-continuous ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral blockade for breast surgery.MethodsPatients who received thoracic paravertebral blockade for breast surgery were identified by retrospective query of our institution’s electronic database over a 5-year period. Data collected included patient demographics, level of block, type and volume of local anesthetic, occurrence of pleural puncture, occurrence of pneumothorax, evidence of local anesthetic toxicity, and patient vital signs. The incidence of block complications, including pleural puncture, pneumothorax, and local anesthetic toxicity, were ascertained.Results529 patients underwent 2163 thoracic paravertebral injections. Zero pleural punctures were identified during block performance; however, two patients were found to have a pneumothorax on postoperative chest X-ray (3.6 per 1000 surgeries, 95% CI 0.5 to 13.6; 0.9 per 1000 levels blocked, 95% CI 0.1 to 3.3). There were no cases of local anesthetic systemic toxicity or associated lipid emulsion therapy administration.ConclusionsPneumothorax following non-continuous ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral block using a parasagittal approach is an uncommon occurrence, with a similar rate to pneumothorax following breast surgery alone.


2021 ◽  
pp. 203-213
Author(s):  
Yen-Chin Liu

Background: Erector spinae plane block could be a potential alternative to paravertebral block or other analgesic techniques for breast surgery, but the current evidence on erector spinae plane block in breast surgery is conflicting. Objective: To compare the analgesic effectiveness between erector spinae plane block, systemic analgesic, and paravertebral block for breast surgery. Study Design: Meta-analysis. Setting: The literature search was performed from 2016 to August 2020 using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane library, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases. Methods: Clinical trials comparing erector spinae plane block to systemic analgesic and paravertebral block were included from the aforementioned databases. Primary outcomes were 24-hour postoperative opioid administration and postoperative pain score. Secondary outcomes were patient satisfaction levels, post-anesthesia care unit and hospital stay, block-related side effects, and opioid-related side effects. Systematic search, critical appraisal, and pooled analysis were performed according to the PRISMA statement. Results: We analyzed 495 cases in 8 randomized controlled trials. Compared with a systemic analgesic, the use of erector spinae plane block resulted in a reduced 24-hour postoperative intravenous morphine equivalent dose by a mean difference of 7.59 mg (P < 0.00001). Compared with paravertebral block, no statistical difference was found in opioid administration. No differences were observed in pain score, opioid-related side effects, or analgesic technique-related complications. Between the trials, heterogeneity existed and could not be evaluated using metaregression owing to inadequate reported data. Limitations: Moderate heterogeneity among the included trials could not be assessed by potential covariates owing to the limited reported data in each trial. Conclusion: Erector spinae plane block is superior to systemic analgesic within 24 hours after breast surgery and can serve as an alternative to paravertebral block with similar analgesic effects. Key words: Erector spinae plane block, paravertebral block, breast surgery, perioperative analgesia, randomized controlled trial, meta-analysis


2016 ◽  
Vol 66 (5) ◽  
pp. 475-484
Author(s):  
Mercedes Fernández Gacio ◽  
Ana Maria Agrelo Lousame ◽  
Susana Pereira ◽  
Clara Castro ◽  
Juliana Santos

1999 ◽  
Vol 97 (3) ◽  
pp. 319 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.A. DUPREZ ◽  
M.L. DE BUYZERE ◽  
B. DRIEGHE ◽  
F. VANHAVERBEKE ◽  
Y. TAES ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document