scholarly journals GLABROUS & NON-GLABROUS SPLIT SKIN GRAFT IN THE RECONSTRUCTION OF FLEXION CONTRACTURE OF FINGERS – AN OBSERVATIONALAND COMPARATIVE STUDY.

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Abhishek Gaur ◽  
Nidhi Gaur
Keyword(s):  
Skin Graft ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Donor Site Morbidity ◽  
Flexion Contracture ◽  
Split Thickness Skin Graft ◽  
Skin Grafts ◽  
Flexion Deformity ◽  
Split Skin Graft ◽  
Thickness Skin ◽  
Split Skin

Background: Flexion contractures of the fingers cause functional and aesthetic problems to a burn patient. Various methods of reconstruction have been described in the literature. These include release and split thickness grafting, release and full thickness grafting. Among those incision or excision of the contracture band and split skin grafting were the simplest and commonest techniques. In this study, we aim to compare functional & aesthetic outcomes of glabrous & non glabrous split skin graft in flexion contracture of fingers. Methods: A total of 60 fingers of patients of post burn finger contractures were undertaken for the study. Patients were evaluated preoperatively on duration of contracture, extent of involvement, type of scar, range of movements using goniometer and degree of fixed flexion deformity. Finger contractures were released and resurfacing done with glabrous & non-glabrous split thickness skin grafts. Postoperative evaluation was done by measuring range of movements of Proximal Interphalangeal (PIP) and Distal interphalangeal (DIP) joints, flexion deformity, donor site morbidity, number of visits to the hospital, colour match of graft to adjacent skin. Results: Functional outcome in terms of active range of motion combined at DIP joint, PIP joint & metacarpophalangeal joint were similar in both glabrous split thickness skin graft & non glabrous split thickness skin graft at the end of six months. As compared with non-glabrous split thickness skin grafts, glabrous split thickness grafts provided superior colour & texture match to surround tissue. There was no significant donor site morbidity in plantar in-step area & patients were able to walk from third to fourth post operative day. There was minimal hypertrophy of plantar donor site, owing to persistent pressure in standing posture. Conclusion: Patient’s satisfaction was greater in glabrous split skin graft.

scholarly journals Regrafting of the Split-Thickness Skin Graft Donor-Site: Is It Beneficial?

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine M Legemate ◽  
Ymke Lucas ◽  
Irma M M H Oen ◽  
Cornelis H Van Der Vlies
Keyword(s):  
Skin Graft ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Skin Grafting ◽  
Split Thickness Skin Graft ◽  
Split Skin Graft ◽  
Thickness Skin ◽  
Split Skin Grafting ◽  
Split Thickness Skin Grafting ◽  
Graft Donor ◽  
Split Skin

Abstract Split-thickness skin grafting remains a fundamental treatment for patients with deep burns and other traumatic injuries. Unfortunately, the donor site wound that remains after split skin graft (SSG) harvesting may also cause problems for the patient; they can lead to discomfort and scars with a poor cosmetic outcome. Regrafting of the donor site is one of the methods described to improve donor site healing and scarring. In this report, we describe a case of a 26-year-old woman with a self-inflicted chemical burn (0.5% TBSA) who underwent split skin grafting. During surgery, only part of the donor site was regrafted with split skin graft remnants. This part healed faster and had a better scar quality at 3 months postsurgery. Nevertheless, the appearance and patients’ opinion on the regrafted part deteriorated after 12 months. With this case report, we aim to create awareness of the long-term consequences of regrafting, which may differ from short-time results. Patients expected to have poor reepithelialization potential may benefit from regrafting of the SSG on the donor site. But in healthy young individuals, timewise there would be no benefit since it can lead to an aesthetically displeasing result.

scholarly journals Split-thickness skin graft donor-site morbidity: A systematic literature review

Burns ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Malachy Asuku ◽  
Tzy-Chyi Yu ◽  
Qi Yan ◽  
Elaine Böing ◽  
Helen Hahn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Systematic Literature Review ◽  
Skin Graft ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Donor Site Morbidity ◽  
Split Thickness Skin Graft ◽  
Thickness Skin ◽  
Graft Donor

scholarly journals CICAFAST: comparison of a biological dressing composed of fetal fibroblasts and keratinocytes on a split-thickness skin graft donor site versus a traditional dressing: a randomized controlled trial

Trials ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra Poinas ◽  
Pierre Perrot ◽  
Judith Lorant ◽  
Olivier Nerrière ◽  
Jean-Michel Nguyen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Wound Healing ◽  
Growth Factors ◽  
Skin Graft ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Split Thickness Skin Graft ◽  
Skin Grafts ◽  
Thickness Skin ◽  
Fetal Fibroblasts ◽  
Biological Dressing ◽  
Graft Donor

Abstract Background Wound repair is one of the most complex biological processes of human life. Allogeneic cell-based engineered skin substitutes provide off-the-shelf temporary wound coverage and act as biologically active dressings, releasing growth factors, cytokines and extracellular matrix components essential for proper wound healing. However, they are susceptible to immune rejection and this is their major weakness. Thanks to their low immunogenicity and high effectiveness in regeneration, fetal skin cells represent an attractive alternative to the commonly used autologous and allogeneic skin grafts. Methods/design We developed a new dressing comprising a collagen matrix seeded with a specific ratio of active fetal fibroblasts and keratinocytes. These produce a variety of healing growth factors and cytokines which will increase the speed of wound healing and induce an immunotolerant state, with a slight inflammatory reaction and a reduction in pain. The objective of this study is to demonstrate that the use of this biological dressing for wound healing at the split-thickness skin graft (STSG) donor site, reduces the time to healing, decreases other co-morbidities, such as pain, and improves the appearance of the scar. This investigation will be conducted as part of a randomized study comparing our new biological dressing with a conventional treatment in a single patient, thus avoiding the factors that may influence the healing of a graft donor site. Discussion This clinical trial should enable the development of a new strategy for STSG donor-wound healing based on a regenerative dressing. The pain experienced in the first few days of STSG healing is well known due to the exposure of sensory nerve endings. Reducing this pain will also reduce analgesic drug intake and the duration of sick leave. Our biological dressing will meet the essential need of surgeons to “re-crop” from existing donor sites, e.g., for thermal-burn patients. By accelerating healing, improving the appearance of the scar and reducing pain, we hope to improve the conditions of treatment for skin grafts. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT03334656. Registered on 7 November 2017.

scholarly journals A Meta-Analysis of the Outcomes of Split-Thickness Skin Graft on Diabetic Leg and Foot Ulcers

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaissar Yammine ◽  
Chahine Assi
Keyword(s):  
Skin Graft ◽  
Evidence Synthesis ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Donor Site Morbidity ◽  
Foot Ulcers ◽  
Split Thickness Skin Graft ◽  
Quantitative Evidence ◽  
Thickness Skin ◽  
Weighted Values

Diabetic lower limb ulcers are a serious complication to diabetes that could lead to amputation and death. Split-thickness skin graft (STSG) has been proposed by some authors to treat noninfected diabetic wounds, mainly those found in the leg and on the dorsum of the foot. No quantitative evidence synthesis over this technique has been reported in the literature. The study is a meta-analysis on the effectiveness of STSG in treating diabetic leg and foot ulcers. Electronic databases were searched from inception. No limitation was imposed on study design. Eleven studies comprising 757 patients with 759 foot/leg ulcers were included. After a mean period of 2 years, 85.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.766-0.925) of ulcers were healed over a mean time of 5.35 ± 2.25 weeks, with a recurrence rate of 4.2% (95% CI = 0.009-0.096), an infection rate of 4.4% (95% CI = 0.013-0.092), and a regrafting rate of 12.1% (95% CI = 0.053-0.212). Infection was the only reported donor site morbidity with a frequency of 1.74% (95% CI = 0.001-0.048). These weighted values are found to be noticeably superior to those reported in the literature following standard conventional care. The results of the review make STSG the ideal method to treat noninfected recurrent or recalcitrant ulcers of the leg and dorsal foot. Furthermore, the authors argue that STSG should be used more frequently in the management of such wounds. The findings should encourage future prospective investigations.

1590 Reconstructing Periorbital Necrotising Fasciitis - A Case Report

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Z Li ◽  
G Filobbos
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Skin Graft ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Lower Eyelid ◽  
Necrotising Fasciitis ◽  
Split Thickness Skin Graft ◽  
Skin Grafts ◽  
First Case ◽  
Eyelid Skin ◽  
Thickness Skin

Abstract Periorbital necrotising fasciitis is a rare life-threatening presentation. We present a case of an 87-year-old patient with periorbital necrotising fasciitis. The patient was successfully managed by prompt diagnosis, debridement and reconstruction with a thick split thickness skin graft harvested from the scalp. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report in literature suggesting the use of sheet skin grafts from the scalp in reconstruction of necrotising fasciitis. The patient was discharged after 20 days and has no residual corneal or scleral show despite losing bilateral upper and lower eyelid skin. We present the case with photographs of initial presentation, debridement, and final reconstruction. Reconstruction of post-debridement necrotising fasciitis offers a challenge to the plastic surgeon. The wound bed is not ideal and commonly colonised. We suggest the use of thick split thickness skin grafts harvested from the scalp. Despite their utility in burns surgery, the use of scalp split thickness skin is not documented in literature for reconstruction of necrotising fasciitis. We believe this type of skin graft offers multiple advantages: higher rate of graft takes, less contracture and inconspicuous donor site morbidity. Time to reconstruction is particularly important in patients with eye lid skin loss and we believe this type of skin graft offers a versatile solution when graft take is essential.

scholarly journals Tumescent non-tumescent technique for split thickness skin graft harvesting

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (12) ◽  
pp. 4026
Author(s):  
M. K. Rajendran
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Skin Graft ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Skin Grafting ◽  
Split Thickness Skin Graft ◽  
Skin Grafts ◽  
Recipient Site ◽  
Tumescent Technique ◽  
Graft Take ◽  
Thickness Skin

Background: Split-thickness skin graft failures can be attributed to flaws in the recipient bed which has to be well prepared. Tissues with limited blood supply such as bone, tendons, cartilage or sites with necrotic tissue or infection do not accept skin grafts. Adrenaline is used to harvest skin grafts due to its vasoconstriction effect which limits blood loss. The aim of our study was to determine skin graft take after tumescent technique compared to a non-tumescent technique for harvesting.Methods: Two treatment groups of patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were randomly assigned. Forty patients underwent split-thickness skin graft harvesting with tumescent technique and forty patients underwent non-tumescent split-thickness skin graft harvesting. The recipient site was opened in both groups on the fifth day after surgery and take rate assessed. The donor site was assessed on day ten and if not healed, followed up for three weeks.Results: There was a statistically significant association between skin graft take rate and skin grafting technique (p=0.011). The mean graft take rate was 2.5% higher in the tumescent group compared to the non-tumescent group (96.3% compared to 94%). On day 10, there was no difference in percentage healing of donor sites between the tumescent and non-tumescent groups, p=0.562.Conclusions: Tumescent technique significantly reduced intraoperative blood loss. It is safe, inexpensive and easy to use. The subdermal adrenaline/saline injection creates a smooth, dense surface which assists debridement and donor harvesting.

Improving Outcomes in Anterolateral Thigh Flap Donor-Site Reconstruction Using Propeller Flaps: A Retrospective Comparative Study with Skin Grafting

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Domenico Pagliara ◽  
Maria Lucia Mangialardi ◽  
Stefano Vitagliano ◽  
Valentina Pino ◽  
Marzia Salgarello
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Skin Graft ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Split Thickness Skin Graft ◽  
Tactile Sensitivity ◽  
Aesthetic Outcome ◽  
Propeller Flap ◽  
Thickness Skin ◽  
Anterolateral Thigh ◽  
Alt Flap

Abstract Background After anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap harvesting, skin graft of the donor site is commonly performed. When the defect width exceeds 8 cm or 16% of thigh circumference, it can determine lower limb function impairment and poor aesthetic outcomes. In our comparative study, we assessed the functional and aesthetic outcomes related to ALT donor-site closure with split-thickness skin graft compared with thigh propeller flap. Methods We enrolled 60 patients with ALT flap donor sites. We considered two groups of ALT donor-site reconstructions: graft group (30 patients) with split-thickness skin graft and flap group (30 patients) with local perforator-based propeller flap. We assessed for each patient the range of motion (ROM) at the hip and knee, tension, numbness, paresthesia, tactile sensitivity, and gait. Regarding the impact on daily life activities, patients completed the lower extremity functional scale (LEFS) questionnaire. Patient satisfaction for aesthetic outcome was obtained with a 5-point Likert scale (from very poor to excellent). Results In the propeller flap group, the ROMs of hip and knee and the LEFS score were significantly higher. At 12-month follow-up, in the graft group, 23 patients reported tension, 19 numbness, 16 paresthesia, 22 reduction of tactile sensitivity, and 5 alteration of gait versus only 5 patients experienced paresthesia and 7 reduction of tactile sensitivity in the propeller flap group. The satisfaction for aesthetic outcome was significantly higher in the propeller flap group. Conclusion In high-tension ALT donor-site closure, the propeller perforator flap should always be considered to avoid split-thickness skin graft with related functional and aesthetic poor results.

scholarly journals Reconstruction of a secondary scalp defect using the crane principle and a split-thickness skin graft

BMC Surgery ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi Lu ◽  
Ke-Chung Chang ◽  
Che-Ning Chang ◽  
Dun-Hao Chang
Keyword(s):  
Skin Graft ◽  
Subcutaneous Tissue ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Split Thickness Skin Graft ◽  
Salvage Procedure ◽  
Primary Defect ◽  
Scalp Defects ◽  
Thickness Skin ◽  
Scalp Defect ◽  
Secondary Defect

Abstract Background Scalp reconstruction is a common challenge for surgeons, and there are many different treatment choices. The “crane principle” is a technique that temporarily transfers a scalp flap to the defect to deposit subcutaneous tissue. The flap is then returned to its original location, leaving behind a layer of soft tissue that is used to nourish a skin graft. Decades ago, it was commonly used for forehead scalp defects, but this useful technique has been seldom reported on in recent years due to the improvement of microsurgical techniques. Previous reports mainly used the crane principle for the primary defects, and here we present a case with its coincidental application to deal with a complication of a secondary defect. Case report We present a case of a 75-year-old female patient with a temporoparietal scalp squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). After tumor excision, the primary defect was reconstructed using a transposition flap and the donor site was covered by a split-thickness skin graft (STSG). Postoperatively, the occipital skin graft was partially lost resulting in skull bone exposure. For this secondary defect, we applied the crane principle to the previously rotated flap as a salvage procedure and skin grafting to the original tumor location covered by a viable galea fascia in 1.5 months. Both the flap and skin graft healed uneventfully. Conclusions Currently, the crane principle is a little-used technique because of the familiarity of microsurgery. Nevertheless, the concept is still useful in selected cases, especially for the management of previous flap complications.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document