scholarly journals ROLE OF MRI IN GYNECOLOGICAL EMERGENCIES

2021 ◽  
pp. 68-69
Author(s):  
K. Geetha

AIM: The aim of this study was to assess the emerging role of magnetic resonance imaging in the gynaecological emergencies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Methods: Twenty nine non pregnant female patients with acute pelvic pain or bleeding per vagina who underwent MRI pelvis at our imaging department between November 2019 and August 2020 were reviewed. The final diagnosis was established by surgical findings in 16 cases, & biopsy in 1 respectively. The remaining 11 cases underwent follow-up MRI. Results: MRI was diagnostic in 28 (95.5%) out of 29 patients and non-diagnostic in 1 case. The commonest gynaecological emergency was ovarian cyst with complications. Imaging findings in 16 (55.2%) patients were correlated with surgery . The overall sensitivity and PPV of MRI in acute gynaecological conditions was 95.6% and 98.2%.

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (7) ◽  
pp. 925-930 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Cantiello ◽  
Stefano Manno ◽  
Giorgio I. Russo ◽  
Sebastiano Cimino ◽  
Salvatore Privitera ◽  
...  

Objective: Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI) has become a very useful tool in the management of PCa. Particularly, there is a great interest in using mpMRI for men on Active Surveillance (AS) for low risk PCa. The aim of this systematic review was to critically review the latest literature concerning the role of mpMRI in this clinical setting, underlying current strengths and weakness. Evidence Acquisition: A comprehensive literature research for English-language original and review articles was carried out using the National Center for Biotechnology Information PubMed database with the aim to identify studies pertaining to mpMRI for AS in low risk PCa patients. The following search terms were used: active surveillance, prostate cancer and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. Evidence Synthesis: Data from 28 recent original studies and reviews were reviewed. We only considered studies on the use of mpMRI in selecting AS patients and during AS follow-up, in order to solve two important questions: -Can mpMRI have a role in improving the detection of clinically significant disease, better selecting AS patients? -Can mpMRI identify the progression of disease and, consequently, be used during AS follow-up? Conclusions: mpMRI is useful to better select the ideal candidates to AS and to monitor them during follow-up. However, despite many advantages, there are yet important limitations to detect all clinically significant PCa and to better define mpMRI-radiological progression during AS. Further larger prospective studies are needed to definitively solve these important problems.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document