scholarly journals Pelanggaran Prinsip Utmost Good Faith pada asuransi jiwa (studi kasus putusan nomor 352/Pdt.G/2013/Pn.Jkt.Sel

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Satria Azis Widiarto

Artikel ini membahas mengenai (1) Apakah alasan penolakan pembayaran klaim pada putusan nomor 352/Pdt.G/2013/PN. Jkt. Sel, antara Dahlan Sinambela sebagai penggugat melawan PT Axa Mandiri Financial service sebagai Tergugat sudah tepat menurut hukum asuransi?; (2) Bagaimana penerapan prinsip utmost good faith pada perkara antara dahlan sinambela melawan PT Axa Mandiri Financial Service pada tingkat pertama hingga tingkat kasasi?. Pada penelitian ini digunakan metode Yuridis-normatif sehingga data yang digunakan berasal dari studi kepustakaan. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah (1) Penolakan pembayaran klaim polis nomor 512-6844199 tanggal 2 Maret 2012 atas nama Tertanggung Uli Sinambela sudah tepat menurut hukum asuransi, (2) Pengadilan Negeri belum menerapkan Prinsip utmost good faith sedangkan dalam tingkat Pengadilan Tinggi dan Kasasi Majelis Hakim telah menerapkan Prinsip Utmost Good Faith dengan benar.

ANCIENT LAND ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 04 (02) ◽  
pp. 46-48
Author(s):  
Tahmina Shahin Alizada ◽  

The article describes the fundamental principles of marine insurance. It mainly examines the principle of "utmost good faith" which is the cornerstone of insurance law. The main aim of an article is to help the reader to gain basic knowledge and understanding of the legal principles of marine insurance. The fundamental principles governing marine insurance are very helpful in the assessment of loss and the claim in the maritime insurance industry. As in all contracts of insurance on the property, also marine insurance contract is based on the fundamental principles. Key words: marine insurance, Marine Insurance Act 1906, principles of marine insurance, utmost good faith, insurable interest


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (01) ◽  
pp. 99-107
Author(s):  
Mingting Zhu
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 237-265
Author(s):  
Baris Soyer

Determining the scope of the fraudulent claims rule in insurance law has posed a significant challenge for the courts, particularly in the last two decades. In the shadow of the doctrine of utmost good faith, the law in this area has developed in an uncompromising fashion introducing draconian remedies against an assured who submits a fraudulent claim. The Supreme Court's most recent intervention has provided much needed guidance on the state of the law. This article, taking into account the fact that in other areas of law more proportionate remedies have gradually been introduced, discusses the boundaries of the fraudulent claims rule in insurance law as it applies in England and Wales and Scotland. Considering that the insurers might be tempted to introduce fraudulent claims clauses into their contracts to expand the common law definition of insurance fraud at the claims stage, this article also evaluates the wording of such clauses often used in practice and concludes that they lack the desired clarity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document