Analysis on Korea’s Intermediate Goods Export Competitiveness to China -Comparison of Korea and Japan’s Intermediate Goods Trade Structure with China-

2017 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 115-144
Author(s):  
Hyun-joo Lee
2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (0) ◽  
pp. 105-144
Author(s):  
Tomohiro Ara ◽  
Hongyong Zhang

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-37
Author(s):  
Son Thanh Nguyen ◽  
Yanrui Wu

The emergence of production networks has changed the structure of international trade, which is characterized by a large share of intra-regional trade flows and a rising value of intermediate goods trade or network trade between countries within the same region. This paper investigates the change in impact of trade determinants with the formation of regional production networks. At the global level, the results show that intermediate goods exports are more sensitive to trade barriers than total goods exports. At the regional level, the comparison reveals that, despite the efforts directed toward export market diversification in East Asia, the region is still more dependent on other regions’ economic conditions than the European Union is.


2010 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-134
Author(s):  
John Berdell ◽  
Animesh Ghoshal

The fragmentation of manufacturing in G7 economies has substantially altered the way in which developing countries participate in world trade and production. Commodity chains and intertwined production networks have become increasingly important as vectors for the diffusion of technology and integration of developing countries into the world economy. We establish a set of simple and transparent benchmarks to compare and contrast the speed and extent to which production networks have integrated each of the G7 with developing economies through the importation of intermediate goods and examine these comparative indicators of G7 integration at both regional and global levels. We examine both total and intermediate goods trade flows and calculate the income-expenditure elasticity of developing-country sourced imports with respect to G7 incomes and also the elasticity of imported intermediate goods with respect to manufactured output. Within the G7, we find three tiers of openness to intermediate goods produced by developing countries, led by Germany and the US. Regional integration exhibits a clear pattern in which Central Europe appears to be integrating with developed Europe, Mexico with North America, and only East Asia is simultaneously integrating with North America, Europe and Japan.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 361-373
Author(s):  
Xie Guoe ◽  
Yu Jia

Based on the statistical data from 1995 to 2018, this paper uses regression analysis, error correction model and impulse response analysis to empirically test the specific impact of import trade structure on Shanghai's technological progress. The results show that the decrease in the proportion of intermediate goods imports promotes the technological progress, while the increase in the proportion of capital goods imports has a significant positive impact on Shanghai's technological progress. The relationship between FDI and technological progress in Shanghai is negative. The development of Finance and the increase of patent authorization promote the technological progress of Shanghai. The stability test of VEC model shows that there is a long-term equilibrium and stable relationship among the variables. Impulse response analysis shows that there is a bidirectional interaction between the import trade structure and Shanghai's technological progress. Therefore, we should further reduce the quantity of intermediate goods with low technology content and increase the import volume of capital goods appropriately. At the same time, we should attach importance to innovation based on introduction and absorption, and use the platform of China International Import Expo to attract foreign enterprises to widely display new products, new technologies and new services of various countries, so as to help high-quality development in the future.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sujin Jang ◽  
E Young Song

2017 ◽  
Vol 44 ◽  
pp. 30-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanghua Huang ◽  
Nimesh Salike ◽  
Feiteng Zhong

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document