scholarly journals What information is being acquired during the period of Quiet Eye? Comment on Vickers

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 112
Author(s):  
Sérgio T. Rodrigues ◽  
Martina Navarro

Sports and athletes’ highest performance offer a fascinating scenario to investigate perceptual-motor expertise. The remarkable work of Joan Vickers has captured this opportunity and built a valuable experimental paradigm. Our commentary emphasizes what information is being acquired during the period of Quiet Eye (QE), capable to produce successful performance. First, an extended notion of visual system that includes posture is presented. It is suggested that QE would represent a collective postural effort (resulting from movements of eyes, head, trunk, and whole body) to acquire the relevant information available in the optic flow. Second, the contribution of neural structures and functioning for vision and attention is discussed. Models of neural networks of attention and two visual systems are described with respect to QE and some questions about action parameters and motor programs are raised.

2002 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 117-118
Author(s):  
Wayne Shebilske

Norman relates two theoretical approaches, the constructivist and ecological, to two cortical visual streams, the ventral and dorsal systems, respectively. This commentary reviews a similar approach in order to increase our understanding of complex skill development and to advance Norman's goal of stimulating and guiding research on the two theoretical approaches and the two visual systems.


2004 ◽  
Vol 44 (6) ◽  
pp. 603-611 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Dassonville ◽  
Bruce Bridgeman ◽  
Jagdeep Kaur Bala ◽  
Paul Thiem ◽  
Anthony Sampanes

2002 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 120-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
John van der Kamp ◽  
Geert J. P. Savelsbergh

Norman's reconciliation of the two theories of perception is challenged because it directly leads to the nature-nurture dichotomy in the development of the two visual systems. In contrast, the proposition of a separate development of the two visual systems may be better understood as involving different types of information that follow a distinct temporal sequence.


Neurology ◽  
1986 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 733-733
Author(s):  
M. I. Botez ◽  
E. V. de la Puente

2000 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 535-536
Author(s):  
Bruce Bridgeman

Neuroanatomy and neurophysiology are insufficient to specify function. Modeling is essential to elucidate function, but psychophysics is also required. An example is the cognitive and sensorimotor branches of the visual system: anatomy shows direct cross talk between the branches. Psychophysics in normal humans shows links from cognitive to sensorimotor, but the reverse link is excluded by visual illusions affecting the cognitive system but not the sensorimotor system.


2002 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 108-110
Author(s):  
David Ingle

The two modes of visual processing “localizing” versus “identifying” as expressed by four authors in 1967 are more encompassing than the “two visual systems” dichotomies posed by later theorists. Norman's view of parietal cortex functions of vision seems much too narrow.


2002 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 195-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Ingle

I support Pylyshyn's skepticism that visual imagery reflects a re-activation of the spatial layout of active neurons embedded within a topographical cortical map of visual space. The pickup of visual information via successive eye movements presents one problem and the two visual systems model poses another difficulty.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document