scholarly journals Automation of shear-wave splitting parameter determination of local earthquakes at Yellowstone : application as indicator of crustal stress and temporal variation

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole D. McMahon
2006 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 157-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuan-Gen LAI ◽  
Qi-Yuan LIU ◽  
Jiu-Hui CHEN ◽  
Jie LIU ◽  
Shun-Cheng LI ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 40 ◽  
pp. 138-145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucia Zaccarelli ◽  
Francesca Bianco ◽  
Riccardo Zaccarelli

1995 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 501-504 ◽  
Author(s):  
John R. Evans ◽  
Bruce R. Julian ◽  
G. R. Foulger ◽  
Alwyn Ross

Geophysics ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 63 (3) ◽  
pp. 935-947 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Rüger

P-wave amplitudes may be sensitive even to relatively weak anisotropy of rock mass. Recent results on symmetry‐plane P-wave reflection coefficients in azimuthally anisotropic media are extended to observations at arbitrary azimuth, large incidence angles, and lower symmetry systems. The approximate P-wave reflection coefficient in transversely isotropic media with a horizontal axis of symmetry (HTI) (typical for a system of parallel vertical cracks embedded in an isotropic matrix) shows that the amplitude versus offset (AVO) gradient varies as a function of the squared cosine of the azimuthal angle. This change can be inverted for the symmetry‐plane directions and a combination of the shear‐wave splitting parameter γ and the anisotropy coefficient [Formula: see text]. The reflection coefficient study is also extended to media of orthorhombic symmetry that are believed to be more realistic models of fractured reservoirs. The study shows the orthorhombic and HTI reflection coefficients are very similar and the azimuthal variation in the orthorhombic P-wave reflection response is a function of the shear‐wave splitting parameter γ and two anisotropy parameters describing P-wave anisotropy for near‐vertical propagation in the symmetry planes. The simple relationships between the reflection amplitudes and anisotropic coefficients given here can be regarded as helpful rules of thumb in quickly evaluating the importance of anisotropy in a particular play, integrating results of NMO and shear‐wave‐splitting analyses, planning data acquisition, and guiding more advanced numerical amplitude‐inversion procedures.


2019 ◽  
Vol 109 (5) ◽  
pp. 1968-1984 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chenglong Wu ◽  
Xiaobo Tian ◽  
Tao Xu ◽  
Xiaofeng Liang ◽  
Yun Chen ◽  
...  

Abstract Remarkable V‐shaped conjugate strike‐slip faults extend along the Bangong–Nujiang suture in central Tibet. Motions of these faults are considered to accommodate ongoing east–west extension and north–south contraction. Fabrics within the fault zone that are anisotropic to seismic waves can provide clues as to the unusual scale and style of lithospheric deformation. With the goal of determining the upper‐crustal anisotropy pattern in central Tibet, we measured shear‐wave splitting parameters (fast wave polarization direction and delay time) using waveforms generated by 194 local earthquakes recorded by 49 stations of the SANDWICH network. Stations located in eastern and western zones of the study area show anisotropy directions that agree well with the maximum horizontal compressive stress direction. The fast polarization directions at stations near active strike‐slip faults generally run parallel to the strikes of these faults. Pervasive inactive thrust faults caused by Cretaceous–Tertiary shortening in central Tibet also clearly correlate with the anisotropy detected at nearby stations. These results demonstrate that both local structures and stress contribute to upper‐crustal anisotropy in the region. Combining the new results with previous SKS‐wave splitting results and other seismic evidence, we propose that deformation in the upper crust is mechanically decoupled from that in the upper mantle, due to eastward middle‐lower crustal flow. This crustal flow causes basal shearing required for the formation of conjugate strike‐slip faults in central Tibet.


2017 ◽  
Vol 717 ◽  
pp. 425-432 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antara Sharma ◽  
Santanu Baruah ◽  
Davide Piccinini ◽  
Sowrav Saikia ◽  
Manoj K. Phukan ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document