scholarly journals Indicadores de qualidade da terapia nutricional enteral são ferramentas úteis para o monitoramento em pacientes com câncer avançado em cuidados paliativos?

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (35) ◽  
pp. 402-407
Author(s):  
Kissila Ferreira de Souza ◽  
Mariana Fernandes Costa ◽  
Rosane de Souza Santos

Introduction: Enteral nutritional therapy (ENT) in patients with advanced cancer in palliative care should be directed towards a better quality of life, being important its monitoring so that the patient has access to the best that the therapy can offer. The objective of this study was to apply the quality indicators of ENT in patients with advanced cancer in palliative care. Methods: Descriptive, observational study with a quantitative approach. Seven ENT quality indicators proposed by the International Life Sciences Institute in Brazil were applied and the reasons for the suspension or interruption of the enteral diet during hospitalization were quantified. Results: 51 patients admitted from May to November 2019 participated in the study. The frequencies of inadvertent exit of enteral nutrition tube (0.02%), the days of adequate administration of the prescribed volume versus infused volume (92.6%) and diarrhea (2%) are within the goal used. The administration of protein (25.5%) and energy (57.4%), the frequency of episodes of abdominal distension (33.3%) and constipation (86.3%) were inadequate. The diet was interrupted or suspended mainly due to the occurrence of vomiting, end-of-life care or tube obstruction. Conclusion: The use of quality indicators of nutritional therapy proved to be viable in this group of patients. Some inadequacies found in this population may be associated with the change in the objective of nutritional therapy in patients with shorter life expectancy. Adaptations based on the prognosis may be necessary, in addition to the application of new indicators, or adjustments to the proposed goals.

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Thery ◽  
Amélie Anota ◽  
Lorraine Waechter ◽  
Celine Laouisset ◽  
Timothee Marchal ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Team-based and timely integrated palliative care is a gold standard of care in oncology, but issues concerning its optimal organization remain. Palliative Care in Day-Hospital (PCDH) could be one of the most efficient service model of palliative care to deliver interdisciplinary and multidimensional care addressing the complex supportive care needs of patients with advanced cancer. We hypothesize that, compared to conventional outpatient palliative care, PCDH allows the clinical benefits of palliative care to be enhanced. Methods/design This study is a multicentre parallel group trial with stratified randomization. Patient management in PCDH will be compared to conventional outpatient palliative care. The inclusion criteria are advanced cancer patients referred to a palliative care team with an estimated life expectancy of more than 2 months and less than 1 year. The primary endpoint is health-related quality of life with deterioration-free survival based on the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. The secondary objectives are the following: increase in patient satisfaction with care using the EORTC PATSAT-C33 and OUT-PATSAT7 questionnaires, better understanding of the prognosis using the PTPQ questionnaire and advance care planning; decrease in the need for supportive care among relatives using the SCNS-P&C-F questionnaire, and reduction in end-of-life care aggressiveness. Patients will complete one to five questionnaires on a tablet before each monthly visit over 6 months and will be followed for 1 year. A qualitative study will take place, aiming to understand the specificity of palliative care management in PCDH. Cost-effectiveness, cost-utility and, an additional economic evaluation based on capability approach will be conducted from a societal point of view. Discussion The first strength of this study is that it combines the main relevant outcomes assessing integrated palliative care; patient quality of life and satisfaction; discussion of the prognosis and advance care planning, family well-being and end-of-life care aggressiveness. The second strength of the study is that it is a mixed-method study associating a qualitative analysis of the specificity of PCDH organization, with a medical-economic study to analyse the cost of care. Trial registration Name of the registry: IDRCB 2019-A03116–51 Trial registration number:NCT04604873 Date of registration: October 27, 2020 URL of trial registry record


2020 ◽  
pp. OP.20.00240
Author(s):  
Claire E. O’Hanlon ◽  
Charlotta Lindvall ◽  
Karl A. Lorenz ◽  
Karleen F. Giannitrapani ◽  
Melissa Garrido ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: Monitoring and improving the quality of palliative and end-of-life cancer care remain pressing needs in the United States. Among existing measures that assess the quality of palliative and end-of-life care, many operationalize similar concepts. We identified existing palliative care process measures and synthesized these measures to aid stakeholder prioritization that will facilitate health system implementation in patients with advanced cancer. METHODS: We reviewed MEDLINE/PubMed-indexed articles for process quality measures related to palliative and end-of-life care for patients with advanced cancer, supplemented by expert input. Measures were inductively grouped into “measure concepts” and higher-level groups. RESULTS: Literature review identified 226 unique measures from 23 measure sources, which we grouped into 64 measure concepts within 12 groups. Groups were advance care planning (11 measure concepts), pain (7), dyspnea (9), palliative care–specific issues (6), other specific symptoms (17), comprehensive assessment (2), symptom assessment (1), hospice/palliative care referral (1), spiritual care (2), mental health (5), information provision (2), and culturally appropriate care (1). CONCLUSION: Measure concepts covered the spectrum of care from acute symptom management to advance care planning and psychosocial needs, with variability in the number of measure concepts per group. This taxonomy of process quality measure concepts can be used by health systems seeking stakeholder input to prioritize targets for improving palliative and end-of-life care quality in patients with advanced cancer.


2021 ◽  
pp. 219-224
Author(s):  
Samantha Cushen ◽  
Aoife Ryan

In palliative care, the aims of nutritional support change with an emphasis on quality of life and symptom relief as opposed to active nutritional therapy. The concept of palliative nutrition has evolved to include all aspects of the palliative trajectory, not just end of life care, with each stage of the trajectory having different nutritional goals. The role of the dietitian in palliative care is a topic that until recently remained relatively unexplored. This chapter introduces the concept of diet as a potential survivorship intervention as opposed to nourishment only and contextualizes the dietitian’s role in palliative care.


2020 ◽  
pp. bmjspcare-2020-00239
Author(s):  
Sandra Kurkowski ◽  
Johannes Radon ◽  
Annika R Vogt ◽  
Martin Weber ◽  
Stephanie Stiel ◽  
...  

BackgroundPalliative care strives to improve quality of life for patients with incurable diseases. This approach includes adequate support of the patients’ loved ones. Consequently, loved ones have personal experiences of providing end-of-life care for their next. This is a resource for information and may help to investigate the loved ones’ perspectives on need for improvements.AimTo identify further quality aspects considered important by loved ones to improve the quality of care at the end of life as an addition to quantitative results from the Care of the Dying Evaluation for the German-speaking area (CODE-GER) questionnaire.DesignWithin the validation study of the questionnaire ‘Care of the Dying Evaluation’ (CODETM) GER, loved ones were asked to comment (free text) in parallel on each item of the CODE-GER. These free-text notes were analysed with the qualitative content analysis method by Philipp Mayring.Setting/participantsLoved ones of patients (n=237), who had died an expected death in two university hospitals (palliative and non-palliative care units) during the period from April 2016 to March 2017.Results993 relevant paragraphs were extracted out of 1261 free-text notes. For loved ones, important aspects of quality of care are information/communication, respect of the patient’s and/or loved one’s will, involvement in decision-making at the end of life (patient’s volition) and having the possibility to say goodbye.ConclusionsIt is important for loved ones to be taken seriously in their sorrows, to be informed, that the caregivers respect the patients’ will and to be emotionally supported.Trial registration numberThis study was registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00013916).


2019 ◽  
Vol 57 (2) ◽  
pp. 233-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Gramling ◽  
Elizabeth Gajary-Coots ◽  
Jenica Cimino ◽  
Kevin Fiscella ◽  
Ronald Epstein ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Sriram Yennurajalingam

Culture play a significant role in the care of patients receiving Palliative care. Understanding and managing cultural differences in end-of-life care is important as misunderstanding can result in under-treatment and unnecessary suffering for the patient and their care providers. Therefore better understanding can improve patient–physician communication and potentially improve patients’ quality of life, coping, and facilitate patients to make informed decisions and set appropriate priorities with regard to treatment and end-of-life care. This chapter discusses key cultural issues in palliative care, including the concepts of nondisclosure, the importance of the use of a medical interpreter, and the importance of an interdisciplinary team.


2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 219-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Heckel ◽  
Alexander Sturm ◽  
Stephanie Stiel ◽  
Christoph Ostgathe ◽  
Franziska A Herbst ◽  
...  

Background: In end-of-life care hygiene, measures concerning multidrug-resistant bacterial microorganisms may contradict the palliative care approach of social inclusion and be burdensome for patients. Objectives: To integrate patients’ perspectives on handling multidrug-resistant bacterial microorganisms at their end of life, their quality of life, the impact of positive multidrug-resistant bacterial microorganisms’ diagnosis, protection and isolation measures on their well-being and patients’ wishes and needs regarding their care. Design: A mixed-methods convergent parallel design embedded quantitative data on the patients’ multidrug-resistant bacterial microorganisms’ trajectory and quality of life assessed by the Schedule for the Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life in qualitative data collection via interviews and focus groups. Data analysis was performed according to Grounded Theory and qualitative and quantitative results were interrelated. Setting/participants: Between March 2014 and September 2015 at two hospitals adult patients diagnosed with multidrug-resistant bacterial microorganisms and treated in a palliative care department or a geriatric ward were included in the sample group. Results: Patients in end-of-life and geriatric care reported emotional and social impact through multidrug-resistant bacterial microorganisms’ diagnosis itself, hygiene measures and lack of information. This impact affects aspects relevant to the patients’ quality of life. Patients’ wishes for comprehensive communication/information and reduction of social strain were identified from the focus group discussion. Conclusion: Patients would benefit from comprehensible information on multidrug-resistant bacterial microorganisms. Strategies minimizing social exclusion and emotional impact of multidrug-resistant bacterial microorganisms’ diagnosis in end-of-life care are needed as well as adaption or supplementation of standard multidrug-resistant bacterial microorganisms’ policies of hospitals.


Author(s):  
LaVera Crawley ◽  
Jonathan Koffman

This chapter attempts to identify ‘differences that make a difference’ when individuals and groups negotiate institutions and practices for palliative and end-of-life care. Two influences on the practice of palliative care-immigration and health disparities-are examined. The World Health Organization definition of palliative care specifies two goals: improving quality of life of patients and families and preventing and relieving suffering. It identifies three ‘colour blind’ strategies for meeting those goals: early identification, impeccable assessment, and (appropriate) treatment. Lastly, the definition addresses four domains of care: (1) problems related to pain, (2) physical conditions, (3) the psychosocial, (4) and the spiritual. This chapter specifically addresses these goals, strategies, and domains in relation to delivering quality palliative care in cross- or multicultural settings.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document