scholarly journals Algebraically Grid-Like Graphs have Large Tree-Width

10.37236/7691 ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Weißauer

By the Grid Minor Theorem of Robertson and Seymour, every graph of sufficiently large tree-width contains a large grid as a minor. Tree-width may therefore be regarded as a measure of 'grid-likeness' of a graph. The grid contains a long cycle on the perimeter, which is the $\mathbb{F}_2$-sum of the rectangles inside. Moreover, the grid distorts the metric of the cycle only by a factor of two. We prove that every graph that resembles the grid in this algebraic sense has large tree-width: Let $k, p$ be integers, $\gamma$ a real number and $G$ a graph. Suppose that $G$ contains a cycle of length at least $2 \gamma p k$ which is the $\mathbb{F}_2$-sum of cycles of length at most $p$ and whose metric is distorted by a factor of at most $\gamma$. Then $G$ has tree-width at least $k$.


2011 ◽  
Vol Vol. 13 no. 1 (Graph and Algorithms) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Grigoriev

Graphs and Algorithms International audience We show that for a planar graph with no g-grid minor there exists a tree-decomposition of width at most 5g - 6. The proof is constructive and simple. The underlying algorithm for the tree-decomposition runs in O(n(2) log n) time.



2004 ◽  
Vol 91 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matt DeVos ◽  
Guoli Ding ◽  
Bogdan Oporowski ◽  
Daniel P. Sanders ◽  
Bruce Reed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  


2009 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. 35-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Grigoriev ◽  
Bert Marchal ◽  
Natalya Usotskaya
Keyword(s):  




2012 ◽  
Vol 102 (6) ◽  
pp. 1189-1210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reinhard Diestel ◽  
Ken-ichi Kawarabayashi ◽  
Theodor Müller ◽  
Paul Wollan


2009 ◽  
Vol 157 (12) ◽  
pp. 2577-2596 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Birmelé ◽  
J.A. Bondy ◽  
B.A. Reed
Keyword(s):  


2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 579-591 ◽  
Author(s):  
GUOLI DING ◽  
STAN DZIOBIAK

Thomas conjectured that there is an absolute constant c such that for every proper minor-closed class of graphs, there is a polynomial-time algorithm that can colour every G ∈ with at most χ(G) + c colours. We introduce a parameter ρ(), called the degenerate value of , which is defined to be the smallest r such that every G ∈ can be vertex-bipartitioned into a part of bounded tree-width (the bound depending only on ), and a part that is r-degenerate. Although the existence of one global bound for the degenerate values of all proper minor-closed classes would imply Thomas's conjecture, we prove that the values ρ() can be made arbitrarily large. The problem lies in the clique sum operation. As our main result, we show that excluding a planar graph with a fixed number of apex vertices gives rise to a minor-closed class with small degenerate value. As corollaries, we obtain that (i) the degenerate value of every class of graphs of bounded local tree-width is at most 6, and (ii) the degenerate value of the class of Kn-minor-free graphs is at most n + 1. These results give rise to P-time approximation algorithms for colouring any graph in these classes within an error of at most 7 and n + 2 of its chromatic number, respectively.



1997 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
James B. Talmage

Abstract The AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment, Fourth Edition, uses the Injury Model to rate impairment in people who have experienced back injuries. Injured individuals who have not required surgery can be rated using differentiators. Challenges arise when assessing patients whose injuries have been treated surgically before the patient is rated for impairment. This article discusses five of the most common situations: 1) What is the impairment rating for an individual who has had an injury resulting in sciatica and who has been treated surgically, either with chemonucleolysis or with discectomy? 2) What is the impairment rating for an individual who has a back strain and is operated on without reasonable indications? 3) What is the impairment rating of an individual with sciatica and a foot drop (major anterior tibialis weakness) from L5 root damage? 4) What is the rating for an individual who is injured, has true radiculopathy, undergoes a discectomy, and is rated as Category III but later has another injury and, ultimately, a second disc operation? 5) What is the impairment rating for an older individual who was asymptomatic until a minor strain-type injury but subsequently has neurogenic claudication with severe surgical spinal stenosis on MRI/myelography? [Continued in the September/October 1997 The Guides Newsletter]



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document