scholarly journals Societal Impacts of Cyber Security Assets of Project ECHO

2022 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
pp. 1274-1283
Author(s):  
Harri Ruoslahti ◽  
Bríd Davis
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Study ◽  
Impact Assessment ◽  
Cyber Security ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Societal Impact ◽  
Product Knowledge ◽  
Knowledge Use ◽  
Project Echo ◽  
Theoretical Approaches ◽  
Societal Impacts

Solutions on both consumer and state levels have become increasingly vulnerable to sophisticated cyberattacks by e.g. malware, phishing, machine learning and artificial intelligence. As the adoption and integration of information technologies are increasing and solutions are developing, the need to invest in cyber-security is at an all-time high. Investment in cybersecurity is a chief priority within the European Union, and project ECHO is a one initiative that put emphasis on devising, elaborating, implementing and enhancing a series of technological solutions (assets) to counteract cyber-attacks. The research problem of this study is what societal impacts do the ECHO assets have as product, as knowledge use, and as benefits to society. The literature review includes theory and practice from academic papers, EU innovation project and professional reports, and some ECHO project workflows. Relevant academic theoretical approaches that provide a basis for this task are: e-skills and training, Organisational Learning (OL), Societal Impact (SI), Societal Impact Assessment (SIA). This is a qualitative pilot study that evaluates the usefulness of employing a Product/ Knowledge/ Benefit Societal Impact framework to assessment of societal impacts. Data collection involved qualitative participatory observation of a co-creative expert hackathon workshop. This pilot study shows that the methodology path, where societal impact of ICT and AI solutions (e.g. the ECHO assets) are examined as these three elements (product, knowledge use, societal benefit). This pilot study serves as a step to validate this path and design and select practical, rigorous and relevant quantitative methodology to further the understanding of both societal impact assessment of cyber, e-, and AI-based solutions and services. To incorporate societal impacts with cyber and e-skills this study recommends developing and refining actual key performance indicators (KPI) to provide a basis for rigorous and relevant qualitative and quantitative questionnaire based inquiry of cyber, e-, and AI-based solutions and services.

scholarly journals Understanding why impact assessment fails; a case study of theory and practice from Wafi-Golpu, Papua New Guinea

2021 ◽  
Vol 89 ◽  
pp. 106582
Author(s):  
Charles Roche ◽  
Martin Brueckner ◽  
Nawasio Walim ◽  
Howard Sindana ◽  
Eugene John
Keyword(s):  
Impact Assessment ◽  
Papua New Guinea ◽  
New Guinea ◽  
Theory And Practice

Missiological research: Making impact or missing the mark?

2021 ◽  
pp. 009182962110021
Author(s):  
Hae-Won Kim
Keyword(s):  
Impact Assessment ◽  
Research Impact ◽  
Societal Impact ◽  
Conceptual Frameworks ◽  
Research To Practice ◽  
Research Knowledge ◽  
Academic Impact ◽  
Research Impact Assessment ◽  
Key Concepts

This article explores ways of conceptualizing research impact and its assessment in the context of missiological research. Can it be assumed that there is a link between missiological research knowledge and research impact on mission practice and practitioners? First, the author defines and discusses some key concepts – research impact, impact assessment, academic impact and societal impact – as well as conceptual frameworks of and approaches to research impact assessment. The author then begins to conceptualize a framework for linking research to practice in missiological research which can be further developed into a framework for research impact assessment.

scholarly journals Analysing IoT Cyber Risk for Estimating IoT Cyber Insurance

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Petar Radanliev ◽  
Rafael Mantilla Montalvo ◽  
Razvan Nicolescu ◽  
Michael Huth ◽  
Stacy Cannady ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Impact Assessment ◽  
Cyber Security ◽  
Industry 4.0 ◽  
Assessment Model ◽  
Theory Approach ◽  
Academic Literature ◽  
Cyber Insurance ◽  
Cyber Risk ◽  
Quantitative Impact ◽  
Grounded Theory Approach

This paper is focused on mapping the current evolution of Internet of Things (IoT) and its associated cyber risks for the Industry 4.0 (I4.0) sector. We report the results of a qualitative empirical study that correlates academic literature with 14 - I4.0 frameworks and initiatives. We apply the grounded theory approach to synthesise the findings from our literature review, to compare the cyber security frameworks and cyber security quantitative impact assessment models, with the world leading I4.0 technological trends. From the findings, we build a new impact assessment model of IoT cyber risk in Industry 4.0. We therefore advance the efforts of integrating standards and governance into Industry 4.0 and offer a better understanding of economics impact assessment models for I4.0.

scholarly journals 1978. Statements about Antibiotic Side-Effects and Patient Desire for Unnecessary Antibiotics

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S662-S662
Author(s):  
Benjamin Miller ◽  
Kathryn Carson ◽  
Sujay Pathak ◽  
Sara C Keller
Keyword(s):  
Antibiotic Resistance ◽  
Primary Care Clinic ◽  
Societal Impact ◽  
Upper Respiratory Tract ◽  
Health Campaigns ◽  
Care Clinic ◽  
Potential Harm ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Societal Impacts ◽  
The Individual

Abstract Background Antibiotic resistance is a global health emergency fueled in part by non-indicated use of antibiotics. Current public education campaigns primarily focus on the risks of global antibiotic resistance or society-wide adverse impacts of antibiotic misuse. There has been little research into what messages have the greatest impact on patient requests for non-indicated antibiotics. Methods We administered a survey at a primary care clinic in August 2018. Participants rated 18 statements about potential harm from antibiotics on how that statement changed their likelihood to request antibiotics for an upper respiratory tract infection (URI) on an 11-point Likert scale. These included 8 statements about potential harm to the individual, 4 statements about potential harm to contacts of the individual, and 6 statements about resistance or the societal impact of antibiotic misuse. Before and after the survey, participants rated how likely they were to request antibiotics for a URI. Results Of 1150 adult patients in clinic over the 6 days of the survey, 250 completed the survey. Statements about potential harm to the individual decreased patient likelihood to request antibiotics more than statements about societal impacts of antibiotic misuse. (P < 0.001). Statements about potential harm to contacts of the patient also decreased patient likelihood to request antibiotics more than statements about resistance or societal impacts of antibiotic misuse (P < 0.001). Statements discussing antibiotic resistance were less likely to impact patient likelihood to request antibiotics than statements not mentioning antibiotic resistance (P < 0.001). All statements decreased patient likelihood to request antibiotics. Overall likelihood to request antibiotics decreased after the survey (from 5.3 pre- to 3.1 post-survey, P < 0.001). Conclusion Statements about how potential harm of antibiotics to the individual had a greater impact than statements about resistance or societal impact of antibiotics. Our results suggest that when dissuading patients from requesting non-indicated antibiotics, providers and public health campaigns focus on the potential harm of antibiotics to the individual patient rather than on antibiotic resistance or societal impacts. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Oh Hi There History: An Adaptation of Historical Research and an Exploration of Fidelity Discourse through Practice

Adaptation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 139-160
Author(s):  
Lydia Nicholson
Keyword(s):  
Research Strategy ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Adaptation Theory ◽  
Adaptation Studies ◽  
Web Series ◽  
Theoretical Approaches ◽  
Practice Based Research ◽  
Adaptation Practice ◽  
Insight Into

Abstract Adaptation studies theorists have debated the value and scope of fidelity criticism for decades, but the application of fidelity discourse from an adaptation practitioner perspective is vastly under-researched. Using a practice-based research strategy, this article describes how a consideration of fidelity discourse during the development of the web-series, Oh Hi There History, supported the development of the series as an adapted text and raised new questions about adaptation theory and practice. Oh Hi There History is an adaptation of the Founders and Survivors project’s research into Tasmanian convict history. This article considers the binary of in/fidelity in a practitioner context, analyses how fidelity taxonomies might be applied to the development of an adapted text, and explores the possibilities of applying through practice theoretical approaches to fidelity discourse around intertextuality and history-as-adaptation. By applying these theories in a new context, this article argues that practice-based research can provide new insight into fidelity discourse and new ways of understanding the role of fidelity in adaptation practice.

scholarly journals Societal Impact as ‘Rituals of Verification’ and The Co-Production of Knowledge

2019 ◽  
Vol 60 (3) ◽  
pp. 493-518 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam Crawford
Keyword(s):  
United Kingdom ◽  
Social Change ◽  
Collaborative Research ◽  
Research Performance ◽  
Societal Impact ◽  
Research Excellence Framework ◽  
Production Of Knowledge ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Societal Impacts ◽  
The Uk

Abstract Thinking about and operationalizing societal impacts have become defining characteristics of university-based research, especially in the United Kingdom. This paper reflects on this unfolding shift in the conceptualization and practice of research with particular regard to criminology. It traces the development of new regulatory regimes that seek to measure research performance and render impact auditable. It argues that these ‘rituals of verification’ engender instrumental and narrow interpretations of impact that accord less space to research-informed social change as a non-linear and uncertain endeavour. This is juxtaposed with a conception of societal impact rooted in methodologies of co-production. Insights from the UK Research Excellence Framework 2014 and 2021 inform discussions and are contrasted with collaborative research efforts to apply co-production in policing research.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document