scholarly journals Identifying the Research Fronts in Korean Library and Information Science by Document Co-citation Analysis

2015 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 77-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae Yun Lee
1998 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 229-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. De Moya Anegón ◽  
E. Jiménez Contreras ◽  
Mercedes De La Moneda Corrochano

Author(s):  
Ahmed Olakunle Simisaye ◽  
A. B. Osinaike

Citation analysis of all the journal articles published in the journal of Library and Information Science (JOLIS) from 2004-2009 is carried out. 72 articles were published in the journal during five (5) years covered. Highest number of (14) articles were published in 2007 and 2008.A total of 998 references were generated by the journals, indicating that 13.7 average citation per articles. The result shows that journals were the most cited materials as it accounted for 37.14% of the total citations, followed by books with 33.14%. The individual articles that had the highest citation had 44 references and was published in 2008. The findings further show that 62 library and information science (LIS) journals cited produced 172 citations. African Journal of Library, Archives and Information science led the ten (10) most cited library and information science journals (LIS) with 40 citations in the journal. 15(24.19%) of the (LIS) journals were published in Nigeria, 45(72.58%) were from outside African continent, while only 2 (3.22%) other journals were from Africa. The majority (38.2%) of materials cited was published in 1995 and beyond, authorship pattern shows that (79.85%) of the materials cited was written by single authors while only 8.8% of the total citations were Internet resources.


2008 ◽  
Vol 69 (6) ◽  
pp. 546-565 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jere Odell ◽  
Ralph Gabbard

Using citation data from Journal Citation Reports (JCR) 1996–2004, this research replicates Meyer and Spencer's analysis of other-field citations to Library and Information Science (LIS) journals from 1972 to 1994. After 1994, JCR added LIS journals emphasizing empirical, information science research and simultaneously dropped journals addressing the profession of librarianship. The newly added journals attract a broader interdisciplinary readership—a readership reflected in a 14 percent increase in other-field citations of the LIS journals. The LIS journals included in both this and the Meyer and Spencer research, a list dominated by titles frequently read and cited by others in the LIS discipline, have not received an equal increase in other-field citations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document