scholarly journals Multidisciplinary Consensus: Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Type 1. Basic Principles of Diagnostics and Treatment

Author(s):  
S.S. Strafun ◽  
O.A. Burianov ◽  
V.V. Povorozniuk ◽  
O.G. Gayko ◽  
N.V. Hryhorieva ◽  
...  

Summary. Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Type I (CRPS I) (G90.5) is a set of condi- tions accompanied by regional pain that is disproportionate in time and degree relative to the normal course of the post-traumatic period or other lesion, does not correspond to the zones of innervation of certain nerves or nerve roots and is usually manifested by sensory, motor, vasomotor, and/or trophic disorders in distal extremities. A multidisciplinary consensus on the basic principles of diagnosis and treatment of complex regional pain syndrome type 1 was adopted at a round table meeting at the XVIII Congress of Orthope- dists Traumatologists of Ukraine in Ivano-Frankivsk on October 10, 2019.Principles of diagnosis and treatment:1) Individual approach taking into account the leading pathogenetic mechanisms of the disease.2) Control over the total number of appointments.3) Using the Bruehl, Atkins or Veldman criteria to diagnose CRPS I.The treatment influence the following links of the pathogenesis of the disease or indi- vidual symptoms: a) inflammation – DMSO (compresses), corticosteroids (short course), b) pain – gabapentin or pregabalin, in case of low effect – antidepressants (in case of no effect – pain treatment by using subanesthetic doses of ketamine, narcotic analge- sics, implantation of neurostimulants or pumps for intrathecal drug administration or sympathetic blocks); c) central nervous system training (mirror therapy, imaging and behavioral therapy, etc.); d) reduction of fear of movements and pain; e) anti-edema and venotonic agents; f) vitamin C; g) activation of the affected limb with increase in range of movements, muscle strength and load tolerance (immobilization only accord- ing to strict indications); с) transcutaneous electrical stimulation of the nerves, ultra high frequency (UHF) in impulse mode and oligothermal dose; i) surgical interventions - surgical treatment is indicated for CRPS type II; for CRPS type I it is indicated in cases where such treatment is intended to eliminate the trigger for CRPS development with adequate multimodal anesthesia/analgesia.

2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 441-449 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guillermo Méndez-Rebolledo ◽  
Valeska Gatica-Rojas ◽  
Rafael Torres-Cueco ◽  
María Albornoz-Verdugo ◽  
Eduardo Guzmán-Muñoz

2009 ◽  
Vol 361 (6) ◽  
pp. 634-636 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angelo Cacchio ◽  
Elisabetta De Blasis ◽  
Stefano Necozione ◽  
Ferdinando di Orio ◽  
Valter Santilli

2016 ◽  
Vol 97 (4) ◽  
pp. 575-581 ◽  
Author(s):  
Secil Pervane Vural ◽  
Guldal Funda Nakipoglu Yuzer ◽  
Didem Sezgin Ozcan ◽  
Sibel Demir Ozbudak ◽  
Nese Ozgirgin

2006 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-3, 9-12
Author(s):  
Robert J. Barth ◽  
Tom W. Bohr

Abstract From the previous issue, this article continues a discussion of the potentially confusing aspects of the diagnostic formulation for complex regional pain syndrome type 1 (CRPS-1) proposed by the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP), the relevance of these issues for a proposed future protocol, and recommendations for clinical practice. IASP is working to resolve the contradictions in its approach to CRPS-1 diagnosis, but it continues to include the following criterion: “[c]ontinuing pain, which is disproportionate to any inciting event.” This language only perpetuates existing issues with current definitions, specifically the overlap between the IASP criteria for CRPS-1 and somatoform disorders, overlap with the guidelines for malingering, and self-contradiction with respect to the suggestion of injury-relatedness. The authors propose to overcome the last of these by revising the criterion: “[c]omplaints of pain in the absence of any identifiable injury that could credibly account for the complaints.” Similarly, the overlap with somatoform disorders could be reworded: “The possibility of a somatoform disorder has been thoroughly assessed, with the results of that assessment failing to produce any consistencies with a somatoform scenario.” The overlap with malingering could be addressed in this manner: “The possibility of malingering has been thoroughly assessed, with the results of that assessment failing to produce any consistencies with a malingering scenario.” The article concludes with six recommendations, and a sidebar discusses rating impairment for CRPS-1 (with explicit instructions not to use the pain chapter for this purpose).


2006 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 213
Author(s):  
Tae Kyu Park ◽  
Kyung Ream Han ◽  
Dong Wook Shin ◽  
Young Joo Lee ◽  
Chan Kim

2018 ◽  
Vol 60 (3) ◽  
pp. 78
Author(s):  
Yasin Demir ◽  
Ümüt Güzelküçük ◽  
Serdar Kesikburun ◽  
Berke Aras ◽  
Mehmet Ali Taşkaynatan ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document