scholarly journals Pengembangan Aplikasi e-Court pada Kantor Hukum di Surabaya

Author(s):  
Budi Endarto ◽  
Dani Teguh Wibowo ◽  
Erry Meta

Arus globalisasi dan liberalisasi serta perkembangan teknologi informasi sangat mempengaruhi model bisnis termasuk jasa hukum yang dalam hal ini juga harus diantisipasi oleh kantor hukum. Dalam pengelolaan kantor hukum, setidaknya terdapat dua langkah pengembangan yakni Knowledge Management Systems and Knowledge Management Technology. Terlebih dengan pemberlakuan Administrasi Perkara di Pengadilan Secara Elektronik (e-Court) sebagaimana diatur dalam Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 3 Tahun 2018, menuntut setiap kantor hukum untuk mengembangkan system informasi e-Court. Tujuan dari program Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat ini adalah mengembangkan dan menerapkan aplikasi e-Court pada dua kantor hukum yakni SMB Law Office dan Kukuh Pramono and Partner sebagai mitra. Metode yang digunakan dalam kegiatan ini adalah mengidentifikasi kepemilikan serta penguasaan mitra akan teknologi infomasi, pengembangan dan penerapan melalui sosialisasi dan pelatihan penggunaan teknologi informasi berupa Administrasi Perkara di Pengadilan Secara Elektronik (e-Court) pada kantor hukum mitra. Hasil dari kegiatan pengembangan dan penerapan aplikasi e-Court pada kantor hukum mitra dapat mewujudkan Knowledge Manamement Systems dan Knowledge Management Technology secara efektif dan efisien.

Author(s):  
Petter Gottschalk

Knowledge management systems refer to a class of information systems applied to manage organizational knowledge. These systems are IT applications to support and enhance the organizational processes of knowledge creation, storage and retrieval, transfer, and application (Alavi & Leidner, 2001). The knowledge management technology stage model presented in this chapter is a multistage model proposed for organizational evolution over time. Stages of knowledge management technology are a relative concept concerned with IT’s ability to process information for knowledge work. The knowledge management technology stage model consists of four stages (Gottschalk, 2005). When applied to law enforcement in the following chapters, the stages are labeled officer-to-technology, officer-to-officer, officer-to-information, and officer-to-application.


2011 ◽  
pp. 525-540
Author(s):  
Petter Gottschalk

Knowledge management systems refer to a class of information systems applied to manage organizational knowledge. These systems are IT applications to support and enhance the organizational processes of knowledge creation, storage and retrieval, transfer, and application (Alavi & Leidner, 2001). The knowledge management technology stage model presented in this chapter is a multistage model proposed for organizational evolution over time. Stages of knowledge management technology are a relative concept concerned with IT’s ability to process information for knowledge work. The knowledge management technology stage model consists of four stages (Gottschalk, 2005). When applied to law enforcement in the following chapters, the stages are labeled officer-to-technology, officer-to-officer, officer-to-information, and officer-to-application.


MIS Quarterly ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 299-313 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yinglei Wang ◽  
◽  
Darren B. Meister ◽  
Peter H. Gray ◽  
◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 250-264 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chulatep Senivongse ◽  
Alex Bennet ◽  
Stefania Mariano

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the value of using a systematic literature review to develop an integrated framework for information and knowledge management systems. Design/methodology/approach First, the systematic literature review method is introduced, differentiating it from traditional literature reviews in terms of value-added and limitations. Second, this methodology is used in a research application focused on absorptive capacity internal capabilities with regard to the processes of acquisition, assimilation, transformation and exploitation. Third, an integrated framework for information and knowledge management systems is developed from this application. Findings The systematic literature review approach provides a rigor that can assist in reducing researcher bias while simultaneously enabling the definition of a precise scope of review, with a clear explanation of selection criteria with the objective to find and review all the studies that are relevant to the search definitions. As a research method, it effectively supports a qualitative, quantitative or mixed methodology. Research limitations/implications This methodology was applied to one specific area of research. Specific limitations include the availability of articles in subscribed databases and the analytical capabilities of the tools used for text mining and analytics. Originality/value This paper demonstrates the usefulness of the systematic literature review methodology in developing an integrated framework for analysis.


2008 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 77-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Holli McCall ◽  
Vicky Arnold ◽  
Steve G. Sutton

ABSTRACT: In an era where knowledge is increasingly seen as an organization's most valuable asset, many firms have implemented knowledge-management systems (KMS) in an effort to capture, store, and disseminate knowledge across the firm. Concerns have been raised, however, about the potential dependency of users on KMS and the related potential for decreases in knowledge acquisition and expertise development (Cole 1998; Alavi and Leidner 2001b; O'Leary 2002a). The purpose of this study, which is exploratory in nature, is to investigate whether using KMS embedded with explicit knowledge impacts novice decision makers' judgment performance and knowledge acquisition differently than using traditional reference materials (e.g., manuals, textbooks) to research and solve a problem. An experimental methodology is used to study the relative performance and explicit knowledge acquisition of 188 participants partitioned into two groups using either a KMS or traditional reference materials in problem solving. The study finds that KMS users outperform users of traditional reference materials when they have access to their respective systems/materials, but the users of traditional reference materials outperform KMS users when respective systems/materials are removed. While all users improve interpretive problem solving and encoding of definitions and rules, there are significant differences in knowledge acquisition between the two groups.


2015 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 272-280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Che-Hung Lin ◽  
Fu-Sheng Tsai ◽  
David D C Tarn ◽  
Shu-Chuan Hsu

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document