scholarly journals Safety and Efficacy of overlap esophagojejunostomy During Totally Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis

Author(s):  
Zhi Guo ◽  
C Deng ◽  
ZY Zhang ◽  
Y Liu ◽  
HD Qi ◽  
...  
BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. e028216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tianyou Liao ◽  
Leilei Deng ◽  
Xueqing Yao ◽  
Manzhao Ouyang

IntroductionTotal gastrectomy is often recommended for upper body gastric cancer, and totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy (TLTG) is deemed to be a promising surgical method with the well-known advantages such as less invasion and fast recovery. However, the anastomosis between oesophagus and jejunum is the difficulty of TLTG. Although staplers have promoted the development of TLTG, the choice of suitable staplers to complete oesophagojejunostomy is controversial and unclear. Therefore, a higher level of research evidence is needed to compare the two types of staplers in terms of safety and efficacy for oesophagojejunostomy in TLTG among patients with gastric cancer.Methods and analysisPubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Wanfang Databases will be comprehensively searched from January 1990 to July 2019. All eligible randomised controlled trials (RCTs), non-RCTs or observational studies comparing the two types of staplers will be included. A meta-analysis will be performed using Review Manager V.5.3 software to compare the safety and efficacy of linear and circular staplers for oesophagojejunostomy in TLTG. The primary outcomes are anastomotic leakage, anastomotic stricture, anastomotic haemorrhage. The secondary outcomes include time to first instance of passing gas after surgery, first feeding time, total operation time, reconstruction time, estimated blood loss. The heterogeneity of this study will be assessed by p values and I2statistic. Subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses will be used to explore and explain the heterogeneity. The risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane tool or the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval will not be required because this proposed systematic review and meta-analysis is based on previously published data, which does not include intervention data on patients. The findings of this study will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal and will be presented at a relevant congress.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42018111680.


Author(s):  
Van Huong Nguyen

TÓM TẮT Đặt vấn đề: Nghiên cứu nhằm đánh giá kết quả phẫu thuật nội soi hoàn toàn và phẫu thuật nội soi hỗ trợ cắt toàn bộ dạ dày nạo vét hạch D2 do ung thư tại Bệnh viện Hữu nghị Đa khoa Nghệ An. Phương pháp: Nghiên cứu mô tả hồi cứu, gồm 126 bệnh nhân ung thư dạ dày được phẫu thuật nội soi hoàn toàn và phẫu thuật nội soi hỗ trợ cắt toàn bộ dạ dày vét hạch D2, từ 2013 đến 2020 Kết quả: Tuổi trung bình 60,6 ± 11,1 tuổi. Tỷ lệ nam/nữ 2.8/1. Ung thư ở giai đoạn I, II, III là 19,0%, 49,2%, 31,7%. Ung thư biểu mô tuyến nhú và ống là 70,6% và tế bào nhẫn là 24,6%. Tỷ lệ tai biến trong mổ của nhóm PTNS hoàn toàn là 4,4% và PTNS hỗ trợ 20,6%. Số hạch nạo vét được trung bình của 2 nhóm PTNS hoàn toàn là 23,7 ± 7,1 hạch và PTNS hỗ trợ là 18,0 ± 7,2 hạch. Lượng máu mất trung bình của PTNS hoàn toàn 30,56 ± 10,2 ml và PTNS hỗ trợ 36,11 ± 9,9 ml. Thời gian phẫu thuật trung bình của nhóm PTNS hoàn toàn là 206,4 ± 30,6 phút và PTNS hỗ trợ 220 ± 40,9 phút. Tỷ lệ biến chứng sau mổ của nhóm PTNS hoàn toàn là 4,4% và PTNS hỗ trợ là 22,3%. Thời gian nằm viện trung bình của nhóm PTNS hoàn toàn là 7,5 ± 2,1 ngày và PTNS hỗ trợ là 10,2 ± 2,4 ngày. Kết luận: Phẫu thuật nội soi hoàn toàn và phẫu thuật nội soi hỗ trợ cắt toàn bộ dạ dày nạo vét hạch D2 do ung thư là kỹ thuật an toàn và hiệu quả trong điều trị ung thư dạ dày. ABSTRACT EVALUATION OF OUTCOMES TOTALLY LAPAROSCOPIC TOTAL GASTRECTOMY AND LAPAROSCOPIC - ASSISTED TOTAL GASTRECTOMY WITH D2 LYMPH NODE DISSECTION DUE TO CANCER Introduction: To evaluate the results of totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy (TLTG) and laparoscopicassisted total gastrectomy (LATG) with D2 lymph node dissection to treat gastric cancer in the Nghean General Friendship Hospital. Materials and Methods: In a retrospective cohort study, 126 patients with gastric cancer underwent TLTG and LATG with D2 lymph node dissection between 2013 and 2020. Results: There were 126 patients with an average age of 60.6 ± 11.1 years. The male/female ratio was 2.8/1. The percent of patients with tumors at stages I, II, III were 19.0%, 49.2%, 31.7%, 70.6% of patients had papillary adenocarcinoma and tubular adenocarcinoma. Patients with ring cell carcinoma wereaccounted for 24.6%. The total percent of incidents during the surgery of the group of TLTG was 4.4%, and the group of LATG was 20.6%. The average number of harvested lymph nodes in the group of TLTG was 23.7 ± 7.1, and the group of LATG was 18.0 ± 7.2. The average blood loss in the group of TLTG was 30.56 ± 10.2 ml, and the group of LATG was 36.11 ± 9.9 ml, and the average operation time in the group of TLTG was 206.4 ± 30.6 minutes, and the group of LATG was 220 ± 40.9 minutes. The total percent of postoperative complications in the group of TLTG was 4.4%, and the group of LATG was 22.3%. The hospital stays in the group of TLTG was 7.5 ± 2.1 days, and the group of LATG was 10.2 ± 2.4 days. Conclusions: TLTG and LATGwith D2 lymph node dissectionwere safe and effective in treating gastric cancer. Keywords: Laparoscopic gastrectomy, gastric cancer, total gastrectomy


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document