scholarly journals Establishing a Multidisciplinary Cavernous Carotid Injury Simulation to Train Neurosurgical, Otolaryngology, and Anesthesia Residents

Author(s):  
Brandon Lucke-Wold ◽  
Haley E. Gillham ◽  
Mark Baskerville ◽  
William E. Cameron ◽  
Dawn Dillman ◽  
...  
2008 ◽  
Vol 144 (2) ◽  
pp. 256
Author(s):  
Neal R. Barshes ◽  
Peter H. Lin ◽  
Matthew M. Carrick ◽  
Hosam F. El-Sayed ◽  
Tam T. Huynh ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 104 (9) ◽  
pp. 1519-1527

Objective: The authors assessed whether anesthesia residents who acted as a scenario creators would have better knowledge retention than their juniors 90 days after participating in a simulation-based anesthetists’ non-technical skills (ANTS) workshop. Materials and Methods: A prospective observational study via simulation ANTS workshop was conducted at a university hospital in southern Thailand in November 2017. Seven third-year post-graduate (PGY-3) residents volunteered as scenario creators, while the remaining anesthesia residents were randomly selected to participate in or observe three case scenarios, which were cardiac arrest, hypotension, and difficult ventilation. Resident’s knowledge was assessed before, immediately after, and 90 days after the workshop using a 20-item multiple-choice questionnaire. Predictors of change in knowledge scores were analyzed using multivariate linear regression analysis and presented as beta coefficient (β) and 95% confidence limits (CL). Results: Twenty-four anesthesia residents were recruited in the present study and included eight PGY-1, seven PGY-2, and nine PGY-3. The roles consisted of seven scenario creators, seven participants, and 10 observers. The overall immediate post-test and 90-day post-test scores increased significantly compared to the pre-test scores with a mean of 15.5 and 13.2 versus 11.7 (p<0.001 and p=0.007, respectively). The predictors of change in 90-day scores were PGY-3 versus PGY-1 (β 95% CL 4.0 [0.5 to 7.6], p=0.039), and role of participants and observers versus scenario creator (β 95% CL 5.5 [2.2 to 8.8] and 6.7 [2.8 to 10.6], p=0.004, respectively). Conclusion: Anesthesia residents who were participants or observers could improve their knowledge 90 days after a simulation-based ANTS workshop without necessarily being a scenario creator. Keywords: Anesthetists’ non-technical skill; Knowledge retention; Scenario creator; Simulation workshop


2015 ◽  
Vol 88 (3) ◽  
pp. 152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Jin Park ◽  
Seung-Kee Min ◽  
Sang-Il Min ◽  
Sang Joon Kim ◽  
Jongwon Ha

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 45-48
Author(s):  
Benjamin Wierstra ◽  
Selena Au ◽  
Paul Cantle ◽  
Kenton Rommens

Arterial misplacement of central venous catheters can often be avoided with the use of real-time ultrasound-guided procedural competency.  However, misplacement can still occur and is more likely to occur when the internal jugular vein is located directly above the common carotid injury.  The resultant injury to the common carotid artery occurs through the posterior wall of the internal jugular vein.  Arterial injury may also occur when the subclavian vein is attempted in a non-ultrasound-guided fashion.  Optimal management requires a coordinated evaluation of the catheter misplacement by Interventional Radiology and Vascular Surgery to ensure maximum patient safety during catheter removal.  This article reviews the literature around this topic and provides a summary of the best approach to safely remove the misplaced catheter. Resume Le mauvais positionnement artériel des cathéters veineux centraux peut souvent être évité grâce à l'utilisation de compétences procédurales guidées par ultrasons en temps réel.  Cependant, un mauvais positionnement peut toujours se produire et est plus susceptible de se produire lorsque la veine jugulaire interne est située directement au-dessus de la lésion carotidienne commune.  La lésion de l'artère carotide commune qui en résulte se produit à travers la paroi postérieure de la veine jugulaire interne.  Une lésion artérielle peut également se produire lorsque la veine sous-clavière n'est pas guidée par un ultrason.  Une gestion optimale nécessite une évaluation coordonnée du mauvais positionnement du cathéter par la radiologie interventionnelle et la chirurgie vasculaire afin de garantir une sécurité maximale au patient lors du retrait du cathéter.  Cet article passe en revue la littérature sur ce sujet et fournit un résumé de la meilleure approche pour retirer en toute sécurité le cathéter mal placé.  


2013 ◽  
Vol 03 (02) ◽  
pp. 64-66
Author(s):  
Mariko Senda ◽  
Tokujiro Uchida ◽  
Hiroyuki Kobinata ◽  
Koichi Nakazawa ◽  
Koshi Makita

2005 ◽  
Vol 103 (6) ◽  
pp. 1325-1325 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nitin Shah ◽  
David O. Warner
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document