An Instrumented Pull Test to Characterize Postural Responses

Author(s):  
Joy Tan ◽  
Wesley Thevathasan ◽  
Jennifer McGinley ◽  
Peter Brown ◽  
Thushara Perera
Keyword(s):  
2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Javier Ricardo Pérez-Sánchez ◽  
Francisco Grandas

Postural instability in Parkinson’s disease (PD) is commonly assessed by the pull test. This clinical test may be biased by the variability of the pull force applied. Our objective was to study the postural responses elicited by reproducible pull forces in healthy subjects and PD patients at different stages of the disease. We performed a multimodal approach that included a systematic analysis of the pull force needed to reach the backward limit of stability (FBLoS) assessed by mechanically produced forces, the displacements of the center of pressure (CoP) recorded on a force platform, and the latencies and patterns of activation of the stabilizing muscles. Comparisons between groups were performed by univariate and multivariate statistical analyses. Sixty-four healthy subjects and 32 PD patients, 22 Hoehn–Yahr (H–Y) stages I-II and 10 H–Y stage III, were studied. In healthy subjects, FBLoS decreased with aging and was lower in females. Mean (SD) FBLoS was 98.1 (48.9) Newtons (N) in healthy subjects, 70.5 (39.8) N in PD patients H–Y stages I-II, and 37.7 (18.9) N in PD patients H–Y stage III. Compared to healthy subjects and when adjusted for age and gender, PD patients H–Y stages I-II exhibited the following: (a) a reduced FBLoS; (b) larger CoP displacements and higher velocities for the same applied force; and (c) combined ankle and hip strategies elicited by less intense pull forces. All of these abnormalities were more pronounced in H–Y stage III PD patients compared to H–Y stages I-II PD patients. In conclusion, patients in the early stages of PD already exhibit a degree of postural instability due to inefficient postural adjustments, and they can more easily be destabilized by small perturbations than healthy subjects. This balance impairment becomes more pronounced in more advanced PD. In the pull test, pull force to step back should be a variable to consider when testing balance in clinical practice.


2018 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. 2325-2333
Author(s):  
Joy Lynn Tan ◽  
Thushara Perera ◽  
Jennifer L. McGinley ◽  
Shivanthan Arthur Curtis Yohanandan ◽  
Peter Brown ◽  
...  

Postural reflexes are impaired in conditions such as Parkinson’s disease, leading to difficulty walking and falls. In clinical practice, postural responses are assessed using the “pull test,” where an examiner tugs the prewarned standing patient backward at the shoulders and grades the response. However, validity of the pull test is debated, with issues including scaling and variability in administration and interpretation. It is unclear whether to assess the first trial or only subsequent repeated trials. The ecological relevance of a forewarned backward challenge is also debated. We therefore developed an instrumented version of the pull test to characterize responses and clarify how the test should be performed and interpreted. In 33 healthy participants, “pulls” were manually administered and pull force measured. Trunk and step responses were assessed with motion tracking. We probed for the StartReact phenomenon (where preprepared responses are released early by a startling stimulus) by delivering concurrent normal or “startling” auditory stimuli. We found that the first pull triggers a different response, including a larger step size suggesting more destabilization. This is consistent with “first trial effects,” reported by platform translation studies, where movement execution appears confounded by startle reflex-like activity. Thus, first pull test trials have clinical relevance and should not be discarded as practice. Supportive of ecological relevance, responses to repeated pulls exhibited StartReact, as previously reported with a variety of other postural challenges, including those delivered with unexpected timing and direction. Examiner pull force significantly affected the postural response, particularly the size of stepping. NEW & NOTEWORTHY We characterized postural responses elicited by the clinical “pull test” using instrumentation. The first pull triggers a different response, including a larger step size suggesting more destabilization. Thus, first trials likely have important clinical and ecological relevance and should not be discarded as practice. Responses to repeated pulls can be accelerated with a startling stimulus, as reported with a variety of other challenges. Examiner pull force was a significant factor influencing the postural response.


2005 ◽  
Vol 2 (6) ◽  
pp. 205-210
Author(s):  
Chia-Chen Chang ◽  
Zuyuan He ◽  
Gregory Senft ◽  
Nasir Ahmad ◽  
Erin Sahinci ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 148 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Boisson ◽  
P. de Anna ◽  
O. Bour ◽  
T. Le Borgne ◽  
T. Labasque ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document