scholarly journals CHARITY. EFFECTIVE ALTRUISM

Author(s):  
ALYONA A. BATURINA ◽  

Many households donate money emotionally and thoughtlessly. They believe that they are doing a good thing, but in most cases they are only doing harm. The article examines such a social movement as effective altruism, which is designed to solve this problem, is designed to make households donate money wisely and generally treat charity more rationally.

Utilitas ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-32
Author(s):  
Federico Zuolo

AbstractIn this article I provide a conceptual analysis of an underexplored issue in the debate about effective altruism: its theory of effectiveness. First, I distinguish effectiveness from efficiency and claim that effective altruism understands effectiveness through the lens of efficiency. Then, I discuss the limitations of this approach in particular with respect to the charge that it is incapable of supporting structural change. Finally, I propose an expansion of the notion of effectiveness of effective altruism by referring to the debate in political philosophy about realism and the practical challenge of normative theories. I argue that effective altruism, both as a social movement and as a conceptual paradigm, would benefit from clarifying its ideal, taking into account the role of institutions, and expanding its idea of feasibility.


Utilitas ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 326-333 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Berkey

In a recent article in this journal, Alexander Dietz argues that what I have called the ‘institutional critique of effective altruism’ is best understood as grounded in the claim that ‘EA relies on an overly individualistic approach to ethics, neglecting the importance of our collective obligations’. In this reply, I argue that Dietz's view does not represent a plausible interpretation of the institutional critiques offered by others, primarily because, unlike Dietz, they appear to believe that their critiques provide reasons to reject the EA view about the content of our individual obligations. I also argue that EA's identity as a social movement provides grounds for denying Dietz's claim that it is objectionably incomplete.


Author(s):  
Victor Kumar

This chapter evaluates effective altruism and its link to science. Contrary to much philosophical discussion, effective altruism is not tied essentially to utilitarianism and therefore does not suffer from the criticisms directed against utilitarianism. Prominent criticisms of effective altruism itself are unconvincing, since they identify remediable problems within the surrounding social movement and not problems essential to the theory itself. As a philosophical theory, effective altruism is worthy of allegiance because it strengthens a laudable connection between moral decision making and scientific evidence. Some philosophers and scientists believe that science supports utilitarianism, but their arguments are unpersuasive. Effective altruism is most plausible when it is divorced from utilitarianism. Despite that, effectice altruism can still encourage large and positive changes to our moral practices.


2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 398-415
Author(s):  
Roger Crisp ◽  
Theron Pummer

Effective Altruism is a social movement which encourages people to do as much good as they can when helping others, given limited money, time, effort, and other resources. This paper first identifies a minimal philosophical view that underpins this movement, and then argues that there is an analogous minimal philosophical view which might underpin Effective Justice, a possible social movement that would encourage promoting justice most effectively, given limited resources. The latter minimal view reflects an insight about justice, and our non-diminishing moral reason to promote more of it, that surprisingly has gone largely unnoticed and undiscussed. The Effective Altruism movement has led many to reconsider how best to help others, but relatively little attention has been paid to the differences in degrees of cost-effectiveness of activities designed to decrease injustice. This paper therefore not only furthers philosophical understanding of justice, but has potentially major practical implications.


Analysis ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 80 (3) ◽  
pp. 433-442
Author(s):  
Max Khan Hayward

Abstract Utility cascades occur when a utilitarian’s reduction of support for an intervention reduces the effectiveness of that intervention, leading the utilitarian to further reduce support, thereby further undermining effectiveness, and so on, in a negative spiral. This paper illustrates the mechanisms by which utility cascades occur, and then draws out the theoretical and practical implications. Theoretically, utility cascades provide an argument that the utilitarian agent should sometimes either ignore evidence about effectiveness or fail to apportion support to effectiveness. Practically, utility cascades call upon utilitarians to rethink their relationship with the social movement known as Effective Altruism, which insists on the importance of seeking and being guided by evidence concerning effectiveness. This has particular implications for the ‘Institutional Critique’ of Effective Altruism, which holds that Effective Altruists undervalue political and systemic reforms. The problem of utility cascades undermines the Effective Altruist response to the Institutional Critique.


2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle M. Fleig-Palmer ◽  
Lillian T. Eby ◽  
Talya N. Bauer ◽  
Robert C. Liden ◽  
Dennis Moberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document