scholarly journals Genomic Selection for Processing and End‐Use Quality Traits in the CIMMYT Spring Bread Wheat Breeding Program

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah D. Battenfield ◽  
Carlos Guzmán ◽  
R. Chris Gaynor ◽  
Ravi P. Singh ◽  
Roberto J. Peña ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karansher S Sandhu ◽  
Meriem Aoun ◽  
Craig Morris ◽  
Arron H Carter

Breeding for grain yield, biotic and abiotic stress resistance, and end-use quality are important goals of wheat breeding programs. Screening for end-use quality traits is usually secondary to grain yield due to high labor needs, cost of testing, and large seed requirements for phenotyping. Hence, testing is delayed until later stages in the breeding program. Delayed phenotyping results in advancement of inferior end-use quality lines into the program. Genomic selection provides an alternative to predict performance using genome-wide markers. Due to large datasets in breeding programs, we explored the potential of the machine and deep learning models to predict fourteen end-use quality traits in a winter wheat breeding program. The population used consisted of 666 wheat genotypes screened for five years (2015-19) at two locations (Pullman and Lind, WA, USA). Nine different models, including two machine learning (random forest and support vector machine) and two deep learning models (convolutional neural network and multilayer perceptron), were explored for cross-validation, forward, and across locations predictions. The prediction accuracies for different traits varied from 0.45-0.81, 0.29-0.55, and 0.27-0.50 under cross-validation, forward, and across location predictions. In general, forward prediction accuracies kept increasing over time due to increments in training data size and was more evident for machine and deep learning models. Deep learning models performed superior over the traditional ridge regression best linear unbiased prediction (RRBLUP) and Bayesian models under all prediction scenarios. The high accuracy observed for end-use quality traits in this study support predicting them in early generations, leading to the advancement of superior genotypes to more extensive grain yield trailing. Furthermore, the superior performance of machine and deep learning models strengthen the idea to include them in large scale breeding programs for predicting complex traits.


2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcio P. Arruda ◽  
Patrick J. Brown ◽  
Alexander E. Lipka ◽  
Allison M. Krill ◽  
Carrie Thurber ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philomin Juliana ◽  
Ravi Prakash Singh ◽  
Hans-Joachim Braun ◽  
Julio Huerta-Espino ◽  
Leonardo Crespo-Herrera ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 2735-2747 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vikas Belamkar ◽  
Mary J. Guttieri ◽  
Waseem Hussain ◽  
Diego Jarquín ◽  
Ibrahim El-basyoni ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 154 ◽  
pp. 12-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie C. Dawson ◽  
Jeffrey B. Endelman ◽  
Nicolas Heslot ◽  
Jose Crossa ◽  
Jesse Poland ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiayin Song ◽  
Brett F. Carver ◽  
Carol Powers ◽  
Liuling Yan ◽  
Jaroslav Klápště ◽  
...  

Agronomy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 1591
Author(s):  
Sebastian Michel ◽  
Franziska Löschenberger ◽  
Ellen Sparry ◽  
Christian Ametz ◽  
Hermann Bürstmayr

The availability of cost-efficient genotyping technologies has facilitated the implementation of genomic selection into numerous breeding programs. However, some studies reported a superiority of pedigree over genomic selection in line breeding, and as, aside from systematic record keeping, no additional costs are incurring in pedigree-based prediction, the question about the actual benefit of fingerprinting several hundred lines each year might suggest itself. This study aimed thus on shedding some light on this question by comparing pedigree, genomic, and single-step prediction models using phenotypic and genotypic data that has been collected during a time period of ten years in an applied wheat breeding program. The mentioned models were for this purpose empirically tested in a multi-year forward prediction as well as a supporting simulation study. Given the availability of deep pedigree records, pedigree prediction performed similar to genomic prediction for some of the investigated traits if preexisting information of the selection candidates was available. Notwithstanding, blending both information sources increased the prediction accuracy and thus the selection gain substantially, especially for low heritable traits. Nevertheless, the largest advantage of genomic predictions can be seen for breeding scenarios where such preexisting information is not systemically available or difficult and costly to obtain.


2018 ◽  
Vol 215 ◽  
pp. 104-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nayelli Hernández-Espinosa ◽  
Suchismita Mondal ◽  
Enrique Autrique ◽  
Héctor Gonzalez-Santoyo ◽  
José Crossa ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document