UNCERTAINTY PRINCIPLES FOR THE KONTOROVICH‐LEBEDEV TRANSFORM

2008 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 289-302 ◽  
Author(s):  
Semyon B. Yakubovich

By using classical uncertainty principles for the Fourier transform and composition properties of the Kontorovich‐Lebedev transform, analogs of the Hardy, Beurling, Cowling‐Price, Gelfand‐Shilov and Donoho‐Stark theorems are obtained.

Author(s):  
David Mustard

AbstractUncertainty principles like Heisenberg's assert an inequality obeyed by some measure of joint uncertainty associated with a function and its Fourier transform. The more groups under which that measure is invariant, the more that measure represents an intrinsic property of the underlying object represented by the given function. The Fourier transform is imbedded in a continuous group of operators, the fractional Fourier transforms, but the Heisenberg measure of overall spread turns out not to be invariant under that group. A new family is developed of measures that are invariant under the group of fractional Fourier transforms and that obey associated uncertainty principles. The first member corresponds to Heisenberg's measure but is generally smaller than his although equal to it in special cases.


Author(s):  
Minggang Fei ◽  
Yubin Pan ◽  
Yuan Xu

The Heisenberg uncertainty principle and the uncertainty principle for self-adjoint operators have been known and applied for decades. In this paper, in the framework of Clifford algebra, we establish a stronger Heisenberg–Pauli–Wely type uncertainty principle for the Fourier transform of multivector-valued functions, which generalizes the recent results about uncertainty principles of Clifford–Fourier transform. At the end, we consider another stronger uncertainty principle for the Dunkl transform of multivector-valued functions.


Mathematics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 1685
Author(s):  
Rui Jing ◽  
Bei Liu ◽  
Rui Li ◽  
Rui Liu

The free metaplectic transformation is an N-dimensional linear canonical transformation. This transformation operator is useful, especially for signal processing applications. In this paper, in order to characterize simultaneously local analysis of a function (or signal) and its free metaplectic transformation, we extend some different uncertainty principles (UP) from quantum mechanics including Classical Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle, Nazarov’s UP, Donoho and Stark’s UP, Hardy’s UP, Beurling’s UP, Logarithmic UP, and Entropic UP, which have already been well studied in the Fourier transform domain.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Walid Amghar

In this article, we will recall the main properties of the Fourier transform on the Heisenberg motion group G = ℍ n ⋊ K , where K = U n and ℍ n = ℂ n × ℝ denote the Heisenberg group. Then, we will present some uncertainty principles associated to this transform as Beurling, Hardy, and Gelfand-Shilov.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 2582
Author(s):  
Lucas M. Martinho ◽  
Alan C. Kubrusly ◽  
Nicolás Pérez ◽  
Jean Pierre von der Weid

The focused signal obtained by the time-reversal or the cross-correlation techniques of ultrasonic guided waves in plates changes when the medium is subject to strain, which can be used to monitor the medium strain level. In this paper, the sensitivity to strain of cross-correlated signals is enhanced by a post-processing filtering procedure aiming to preserve only strain-sensitive spectrum components. Two different strategies were adopted, based on the phase of either the Fourier transform or the short-time Fourier transform. Both use prior knowledge of the system impulse response at some strain level. The technique was evaluated in an aluminum plate, effectively providing up to twice higher sensitivity to strain. The sensitivity increase depends on a phase threshold parameter used in the filtering process. Its performance was assessed based on the sensitivity gain, the loss of energy concentration capability, and the value of the foreknown strain. Signals synthesized with the time–frequency representation, through the short-time Fourier transform, provided a better tradeoff between sensitivity gain and loss of energy concentration.


2021 ◽  
Vol 262 ◽  
pp. 117928
Author(s):  
Shusaku Nakajima ◽  
Shuhei Horiuchi ◽  
Akifumi Ikehata ◽  
Yuichi Ogawa

2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lung-Hui Chen

Abstract In this paper, we discuss how to partially determine the Fourier transform F ⁢ ( z ) = ∫ - 1 1 f ⁢ ( t ) ⁢ e i ⁢ z ⁢ t ⁢ 𝑑 t , z ∈ ℂ , F(z)=\int_{-1}^{1}f(t)e^{izt}\,dt,\quad z\in\mathbb{C}, given the data | F ⁢ ( z ) | {\lvert F(z)\rvert} or arg ⁡ F ⁢ ( z ) {\arg F(z)} for z ∈ ℝ {z\in\mathbb{R}} . Initially, we assume [ - 1 , 1 ] {[-1,1]} to be the convex hull of the support of the signal f. We start with reviewing the computation of the indicator function and indicator diagram of a finite-typed complex-valued entire function, and then connect to the spectral invariant of F ⁢ ( z ) {F(z)} . Then we focus to derive the unimodular part of the entire function up to certain non-uniqueness. We elaborate on the translation of the signal including the non-uniqueness associates of the Fourier transform. We show that the phase retrieval and magnitude retrieval are conjugate problems in the scattering theory of waves.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document