scholarly journals Inflows in the Inner White-light Corona: The Closing-down of Flux after Coronal Mass Ejections

2017 ◽  
Vol 850 (1) ◽  
pp. 6 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Hess ◽  
Y.-M. Wang
1994 ◽  
Vol 144 ◽  
pp. 82
Author(s):  
E. Hildner

AbstractOver the last twenty years, orbiting coronagraphs have vastly increased the amount of observational material for the whitelight corona. Spanning almost two solar cycles, and augmented by ground-based K-coronameter, emission-line, and eclipse observations, these data allow us to assess,inter alia: the typical and atypical behavior of the corona; how the corona evolves on time scales from minutes to a decade; and (in some respects) the relation between photospheric, coronal, and interplanetary features. This talk will review recent results on these three topics. A remark or two will attempt to relate the whitelight corona between 1.5 and 6 R⊙to the corona seen at lower altitudes in soft X-rays (e.g., with Yohkoh). The whitelight emission depends only on integrated electron density independent of temperature, whereas the soft X-ray emission depends upon the integral of electron density squared times a temperature function. The properties of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) will be reviewed briefly and their relationships to other solar and interplanetary phenomena will be noted.


2011 ◽  
Vol 742 (1) ◽  
pp. 29 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. Pasachoff ◽  
V. Rušin ◽  
M. Saniga ◽  
H. Druckmüllerová ◽  
B. A. Babcock

1994 ◽  
pp. 217-221
Author(s):  
A. Sanchez-Ibarra ◽  
M. Cisneros-Molina ◽  
G. Hinojosa-Palafox ◽  
F. Cisneros-Peña ◽  
J. Guerrero De la Torre ◽  
...  

1990 ◽  
Vol 142 ◽  
pp. 347-349
Author(s):  
V. Rusin ◽  
V. Dermendjiev ◽  
M. Rybansky ◽  
G. Buyukliev

The problem of prominences-corona relationship is relativelly old. Already in 1931 Lockyer [1] showed that there is a close relation between prominences distribution and the form of white-light corona. However, this problem is still debatable and poses a number of controversial questions. One of them is the question of the energy and mass exchange between prominences and the ambient corona. It is generally assumed that the mass balance exists between the corona and prominences, but unambiguous observational proofs for prominences-corona plasma exchange are very rare. There are little data [2-4], as well, that could be used to address the problem of slight plasma flows from prominences to the corona.


2020 ◽  
Vol 495 (2) ◽  
pp. 2170-2178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vojtech Rušin ◽  
Paul Prikryl ◽  
Emil A Prikryl

ABSTRACT Light and dark adaptation and luminance contrast enhancement are well-known characteristics of human vision that allow us to observe a wide range of light intensity not fully captured in standard camera images. The naked-eye observations of total eclipses, some recorded with spectacular detail in artists’ paintings, reveal structure that is consistent with images obtained by telescopes equipped with recording media. The actual shape of the corona during a total eclipse depends not only on the phase of the solar cycle but, as can be simply demonstrated, also on the day-to-day variability and spatial distribution of coronal intensity that is determined by solar surface magnetic fields, including the locations of coronal holes that are the sources of high-speed solar wind causing geomagnetic storms. The latter were very similar for the eclipses in 1932, 1994, and 2017, which is the main reason why the naked-eye observations, as well as the processed images (1994 and 2017), of the white-light corona displayed very similar shapes. White-light corona image processing is a useful technique to enhance the contrast to observe fine-scale structure that is consistent with the physics of the solar atmosphere shaped by the magnetic field drawn out into the interplanetary space by solar wind.


Solar Physics ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 279 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoichiro Hanaoka ◽  
Yoshihiro Kikuta ◽  
Jun Nakazawa ◽  
Kouji Ohnishi ◽  
Kazuo Shiota

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document