scholarly journals Measuring Stellar Masses of Emission-line Galaxies at 1.2 < z < 1.9

2021 ◽  
Vol 912 (2) ◽  
pp. 145
Author(s):  
Gautam Nagaraj ◽  
Robin Ciardullo ◽  
Alex Lawson ◽  
William P. Bowman ◽  
Greg Zeimann ◽  
...  
2008 ◽  
Vol 4 (S255) ◽  
pp. 397-401
Author(s):  
David J. Rosario ◽  
Carlos Hoyos ◽  
David Koo ◽  
Andrew Phillips

AbstractWe present a study of remarkably luminous and unique dwarf galaxies at redshifts of 0.5 < z < 0.7, selected from the DEEP2 Galaxy Redshift survey by the presence of the temperature sensitive [OIII]λ4363 emission line. Measurements of this important auroral line, as well as other strong oxygen lines, allow us to estimate the integrated oxygen abundances of these galaxies accurately without being subject to the degeneracy inherent in the standard R23 system used by most studies. [O/H] estimates range between 1/5–1/10 of the solar value. Not surprisingly, these systems are exceedingly rare and hence represent a population that is not typically present in local surveys such as SDSS, or smaller volume deep surveys such as GOODS.Our low-metallicity galaxies exhibit many unprecedented characteristics. With B-band luminosities close to L*, thse dwarfs lie significantly away from the luminosity-metallicity relationships of both local and intermediate redshift star-forming galaxies. Using stellar masses determined from optical and NIR photometry, we show that they also deviate strongly from corresponding mass-metallicity relationships. Their specific star formation rates are high, implying a significant burst of recent star formation. A campaign of high resolution spectroscopic follow-up shows that our galaxies have dynamical properties similar to local HII and compact emission line galaxies, but mass-to-light ratios that are much higher than average star-forming dwarfs.The low metallicities, high specific star formation rates, and small halo masses of our galaxies mark them as lower redshift analogs of Lyman-Break galaxies, which, at z ~ 2 are evolving onto the metallicity sequence that we observe in the galaxy population of today. In this sense, these systems offer fundamental insights into the physical processes and regulatory mechanisms that drive galaxy evolution in that epoch of major star formation and stellar mass assembly.


2013 ◽  
Vol 778 (1) ◽  
pp. L22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael V. Maseda ◽  
Arjen van der Wel ◽  
Elisabete da Cunha ◽  
Hans-Walter Rix ◽  
Camilla Pacifici ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 234-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gao Feng ◽  
Kong Xu ◽  
Lin Xuan-bin ◽  
Zhang Wei ◽  
Li Jun-rong

2015 ◽  
Vol 578 ◽  
pp. A105 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Amorín ◽  
E. Pérez-Montero ◽  
T. Contini ◽  
J. M. Vílchez ◽  
M. Bolzonella ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 499 (4) ◽  
pp. 5527-5546 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amélie Tamone ◽  
Anand Raichoor ◽  
Cheng Zhao ◽  
Arnaud de Mattia ◽  
Claudio Gorgoni ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT We present the anisotropic clustering of emission-line galaxies (ELGs) from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey IV (SDSS-IV) extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (eBOSS) Data Release 16 (DR16). Our sample is composed of 173 736 ELGs covering an area of 1170 deg2 over the redshift range 0.6 ≤ z ≤ 1.1. We use the convolution Lagrangian perturbation theory in addition to the Gaussian streaming redshift space distortions to model the Legendre multipoles of the anisotropic correlation function. We show that the eBOSS ELG correlation function measurement is affected by the contribution of a radial integral constraint that needs to be modelled to avoid biased results. To mitigate the effect from unknown angular systematics, we adopt a modified correlation function estimator that cancels out the angular modes from the clustering. At the effective redshift, zeff = 0.85, including statistical and systematical uncertainties, we measure the linear growth rate of structure fσ8(zeff) = 0.35 ± 0.10, the Hubble distance $D_ H(z_{\rm eff})/r_{\rm drag} = 19.1^{+1.9}_{-2.1}$, and the comoving angular diameter distance DM(zeff)/rdrag = 19.9 ± 1.0. These results are in agreement with the Fourier space analysis, leading to consensus values of: fσ8(zeff) = 0.315 ± 0.095, $D_H(z_{\rm eff})/r_{\rm drag} = 19.6^{+2.2}_{-2.1}$, and DM(zeff)/rdrag = 19.5 ± 1.0, consistent with ΛCDM model predictions with Planck parameters.


1987 ◽  
Vol 63 ◽  
pp. 295 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sylvain Veilleux ◽  
Donald E. Osterbrock

1999 ◽  
Vol 137 (2) ◽  
pp. 299-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. A. Pustilnik ◽  
D. Engels ◽  
A. V. Ugryumov ◽  
V. A. Lipovetsky ◽  
H.-J. Hagen ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
E. Thommes ◽  
R. Fockenbrock ◽  
H. Hippelein ◽  
K. Meisenheimer ◽  
H.-J. Röser

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document