scholarly journals Outcomes of 23G vitrectomy and internal limiting membrane peeling with brilliant blue in patients with myopic foveoschisis from a retrospective cohort study

Author(s):  
Xinbang Mao ◽  
Zhipeng You ◽  
Yanhua Cheng
2015 ◽  
Vol 133 (1) ◽  
pp. 85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felipe P. P. Almeida ◽  
Ana Claudia De Lucca ◽  
Ingrid Ursula Scott ◽  
Rodrigo Jorge ◽  
Andre Messias

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Jia-lin Wang ◽  
Yan-ling Wang

Purpose. To investigate the outcome of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with suitable internal limiting membrane peeling (ILM) and air tamponade for patients with highly myopic foveoschisis-associated lamellar macular hole (MH). Methods. This retrospective interventional case series included 11 patients with highly myopic foveoschisis-associated lamellar MH who underwent PPV and indocyanine green-aided ILM peeling up to the temporal vascular arcades. Following air tamponade after surgery, all patients were instructed to maintain a face-down position. The patients were followed up for over 1 year and evaluated for MH closure and the best-corrected visual acuity before and after surgery. Results. The mean ± standard deviation values of patient age, axial length, and follow-up duration were 67.82 ± 6.54 years, 29.21 ± 1.95 mm, and 24.27 ± 8.11 months, respectively. After surgery, the lamellar MH closed in all eyes, and 10 eyes showed vision improvement at the 1-month, 3-month, and final follow-up evaluations. One patient showed decreased vision at 2 years after surgery, with patchy chorioretinal atrophy in the macular region. Myopic foveoschisis showed resolution in three eyes and alleviation in eight. Ten patients underwent cataract surgery during PPV. Conclusion. Extension of ILM peeling up to the temporal vascular arcades and air tamponade after PPV may improve the visual function and rate of MH closure for patients with highly myopic foveoschisis-associated lamellar MH.


2004 ◽  
Vol 137 (4) ◽  
pp. 719-724 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasushi Ikuno ◽  
Kaori Sayanagi ◽  
Masahito Ohji ◽  
Motohiro Kamei ◽  
Fumi Gomi ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 95 (2) ◽  
pp. e128-e131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chia-Ling Lee ◽  
Wen-Chuan Wu ◽  
Kuo-Jen Chen ◽  
Li-Yi Chiu ◽  
Kwou-Yeung Wu ◽  
...  

Retina ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Tzyy-Chang Ho ◽  
Muh-Shy Chen ◽  
Jen-Shang Huang ◽  
Yung-Feng Shih ◽  
Henry Ho ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed Mamdouh Elwan ◽  
Ayman Elsayed Abd Elghafar ◽  
Sherein Mahmoud Hagras ◽  
Waleed Ali Abou Samra ◽  
Sameh Mohamed Saleh

Purpose: To compare between vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling over the whole macula and preservation of the epi-foveal internal limiting membrane in myopic foveoschisis. Patients and methods: A prospective controlled non- randomized comparative study included patients with myopic foveoschisis recruited between 2013 and 2017. Patients were allocated into two groups: group A included patients who underwent vitrectomy with complete macular internal limiting membrane peeling and group B included those who underwent preservation of the epi-foveal membrane. Pre- and postoperative best corrected visual acuity and macular optical coherence tomography were obtained and compared. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding the preoperative baseline data. The difference between the two groups was insignificant as regard postoperative best corrected visual acuity (p = 0.18) and central foveal thickness (p =0.504). There was statistically significant improvement in final best corrected visual acuity within each group (p < 0.0001). Central foveal thickness significantly decreased postoperatively within each group (p < 0.001). No macular holes or other visual-threatening complications were recorded in either group. Conclusion: Vitrectomy with complete internal limiting membrane peeling resulted in comparable outcomes to those achieved with preservation of the epi-foveal membrane in treating cases with myopic foveoschisis. There was no statistically significant difference in final visual acuity between the two groups. No macular holes were recorded in either group.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document