Is it Betrayal Aversion or Regret Aversion ?

2012 ◽  
Vol 78 (3) ◽  
pp. 101
Author(s):  
Itzhak Aharon

Author(s):  
Jochen Reb ◽  
Terry Connolly
Keyword(s):  


2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan J. Koehler ◽  
Andrew Gershoff


Author(s):  
Febria Nalurita ◽  
Farah Margaretha Leon ◽  
Hamdy Hady

This study aims to investigate the effect of loss aversion, regret aversion, and market factors, on investment decision making with the moderating role of locus of control. Data collection is done by distributing questionnaires. The survey was conducted on individual investors in the Indonesia Stock Exchange in Jakarta to obtain a sample of 281. This research uses the Structural Equation Modeling approach. The statistical tool used is LISREL 8.8. This study found that loss aversion, regret aversion, and market factors significantly influence investment decision making. Locus of control plays the role of moderation between loss aversion, regret aversion, market factors, and investment decision making. The novelty in this study reveals the research that needs to be done to encourage investors to make rational decisions and control the required rate of returns through their locus of control. This research helps investors to make decisions logically and rationally with an open mind, high-performance thoughts and positive actions for investment goals that produce positive returns.



Author(s):  
Robin Cubitt ◽  
Simon Gachter ◽  
Simone Quercia




Author(s):  
Jason Anthony Aimone ◽  
Sheryl B. Ball ◽  
Brooks King-Casas


2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Ze Wang ◽  
Haiqiang Yang ◽  
Linglin Ni

Following the research on human decision-making under risk and uncertainty, the purpose of this paper is to analyze evacuees’ risky route decision behavior and its effect on traffic equilibrium. It examines the possibility of applying regret theory to model travellers’ regret-taking behavior and network equilibrium in emergency context. By means of modifying the utility function in expected utility theory, a regret-based evacuation traffic equilibrium model is established, accounting for the evacuee’s psychological behavior of regret aversion and risk aversion. Facing two parallel evacuation routes choice situation, the effect of evacuees’ risk aversion and regret aversion on traffic equilibrium is numerically investigated as well as the road capacity reduction from natural disaster. The findings reveal that evacuees prefer the riskless route with the lower travel time as the increase of the regret aversion degree. The equilibrium tends to be achieved when more evacuees choose the safer route jointly affected by risk aversion and regret aversion. Moreover, an optimization model for disaster occurring possibility is formulated to assess the traffic system performance for evacuation management. These findings are helpful for understanding how the regret aversion and risk aversion influence traffic equilibrium.





2013 ◽  
Vol 89 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason A. Aimone ◽  
Daniel Houser
Keyword(s):  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document