scholarly journals Effect of Rock Fragments Cover on Distance of Rill Erosion Initiation and Overland Flow Hydraulics

2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 100-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mirzaee Salman ◽  
Gorji Manochehr ◽  
Jafari Ali
Author(s):  
Vito Ferro ◽  
Vincenzo Bagarello

Field plots are often used to obtain experimental data (soil loss values corresponding to different climate, soil, topographic, crop, and management conditions) for predicting and evaluating soil erosion and sediment yield. Plots are used to study physical phenomena affecting soil detachment and transport, and their sizes are determined according to the experimental objectives and the type of data to be obtained. Studies on interrill erosion due to rainfall impact and overland flow need small plot width (2–3 m) and length (< 10 m), while studies on rill erosion require plot lengths greater than 6–13 m. Sites must be selected to represent the range of uniform slopes prevailing in the farming area under consideration. Plots equipped to study interrill and rill erosion, like those used for developing the Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE), measure erosion from the top of a slope where runoff begins; they must be wide enough to minimize the edge or border effects and long enough to develop downslope rills. Experimental stations generally include bounded runoff plots of known rea, slope steepness, slope length, and soil type, from which both runoff and soil loss can be monitored. Once the boundaries defining the plot area are fixed, a collecting equipment must be used to catch the plot runoff. A conveyance system (H-flume or pipe) carries total runoff to a unit sampling the sediment and a storage system, such as a sequence of tanks, in which sediments are accumulated. Simple methods have been developed for estimating the mean sediment concentration of all runoff stored in a tank by using the vertical concentration profile measured on a side of the tank. When a large number of plots are equipped, the sampling of suspension and consequent oven-drying in the laboratory are highly time-consuming. For this purpose, a sampler that can extract a column of suspension, extending from the free surface to the bottom of the tank, can be used. For large plots, or where runoff volumes are high, a divisor that splits the flow into equal parts and passes one part in a storage tank as a sample can be used. Examples of these devices include the Geib multislot divisor and the Coshocton wheel. Specific equipment and procedures must be employed to detect the soil removed by rill and gully erosion. Because most of the soil organic matter is found close to the soil surface, erosion significantly decreases soil organic matter content. Several studies have demonstrated that the soil removed by erosion is 1.3–5 times richer in organic matter than the remaining soil. Soil organic matter facilitates the formation of soil aggregates, increases soil porosity, and improves soil structure, facilitating water infiltration. The removal of organic matter content can influence soil infiltration, soil structure, and soil erodibility.


Soil Research ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 525 ◽  
Author(s):  
RJ Loch ◽  
TE Donnollan

The effects of three tillage treatments-rough-, fine- and zero-tilled-on rill erosion of a bare, self-mulching black earth were tested to determine whether tillage practices could reduce susceptibility of such soils to entrainment and transport by overland flow. In contrast to reported results for a silt loam soil, rill erosion was greatest for zero-tilled soil, and similar for the two tilled treatments. Sediment size distributions were independent of initial dry aggregate size distributions. It seems that, for self-mulching soils, stubble retention is the only method available to increase resistance to erosion by overland flow.


Soil Research ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 685 ◽  
Author(s):  
APB Proffitt ◽  
CW Rose

Settling velocity characteristics of sediment eroded by overland flow only, or from a combination of rainfall (100 mm h-l) and runon were measured under controlled conditions in a simulated rainfall tilting-flume facility. Two contrasting soil types were studied: a cracking clay (black earth or vertisol), and a slightly dispersive sandy clay loam (solonchak or aridisol). For a constant volumetric flux (1.0x10-1 m3 m-1 s-1) at exit from the 5.8m long flume and a slope of 0.5%, sheet erosion prevailed, whilst for the same flux at a steeper slope of 5%, rill erosion prevailed. Settling velocity characteristics of eroded sediment were found to be dependent on erosion process, flow hydraulics, soil type, and time in the erosion event. For both soil types, there was a progressive change in settling velocity characteristics with time, this change being less pronounced for sediment eroded dominantly by rill flow as opposed to sheet flow. Temporal changes in settling velocity characteristics were attributed to the development of a deposited layer of coarser, faster settling sediment on the soil surface. The net outcome of rill erosion was less size-selectivity compared with sheet erosion, as determined by the measured settling velocity characteristics of eroded sediment. This outcome was associated with the greater erosive power of rill flow compared with sheet flow. Rainfall was found to influence the settling velocity characteristics of eroded sediment substantially when sheet flow predominated. This was thought to be due to lower flow velocities under rainfall (and therefore smaller contribution to soil loss by entrainment). The findings reported in this study have important implications when assessing nutrient losses from eroded sediment, and in predicting the spatial redistribution of eroded sediment.


2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 163-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chun-hong Zhao ◽  
Jian-en Gao ◽  
Meng-jie Zhang ◽  
Fei Wang ◽  
Tong Zhang

1990 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 501-503 ◽  
Author(s):  
Athol D. Abrahams ◽  
Anthony J. Parsons

2017 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 390-406 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanzhi Li ◽  
Dengxing Fan ◽  
Jianzhi Niu ◽  
Guodong Jia ◽  
Jiamei Sun ◽  
...  

Abstract Surface rock fragments retard overland flow discharge, reduce the runoff generation rate and soil erosion as well as nutrients loss. In Northwest China, a common method for minimizing water, soil, and nutrient losses is the use of rock fragment cover. We used lab stimulation testing to evaluate rock fragment cover efficacy for nutrient conservation. Nutrient losses were determined in both the runoff and sediments under three rain intensities (30, 60 and 90 mm·h−1), four rock fragment covers (0, 10, 20 and 30%) and a slope of 10°. The results showed that rock fragment cover significantly reduced the nutrient losses. Compared with the bare soil control, the rock fragment cover reduced the runoff volume and sediments by 18–38 and 11–69%, respectively, and reduced N and P losses by 9–43 and 16–70%, respectively. These results indicate that rock fragment cover is an effective method for reducing land degradation and improving local environmental conditions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document