How to use low-molecular weight heparin for outpatient management of deep vein thrombosis

1999 ◽  
Vol 66 (6) ◽  
pp. 329-331 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. S. WILKE ◽  
S. R. DEITCHER ◽  
J. W. OLIN ◽  
J. BARTHOLOMEW
2000 ◽  
Vol 83 (02) ◽  
pp. 209-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Anderson ◽  
B. Morrow ◽  
L. Gray ◽  
D. Touchie ◽  
P. S. Wells ◽  
...  

SummaryPulmonary embolism is a common complication of deep vein thrombosis. It has been established that low molecular weight heparin may be used to treat deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism and randomized studies have established that outpatient management of deep vein thrombosis with low molecular weight heparin is at least as effective as in-hospital management with unfractionated heparin.This was a prospective cohort study of eligible patients with pulmonary embolism managed as outpatients using dalteparin (200 U/kg s/c daily) for a minimum of five days and warfarin for 3 months. Outpatients included those managed exclusively out of hospital and those managed initially for 1-3 days as inpatients who then completed therapy o out of hospital. Reasons for admission included hemodynamic instability; hypoxia requiring oxygen therapy; admission for another medical reason; severe pain requiring parenteral analgesia or high risk of major bleeding. Patients were followed for three months for clinically apparent recurrent venous thromboembolism and bleeding.Between three teaching hospitals, a total of 158 patients with pulmonary embolism were identified. Fifty patients were managed as inpatients and 108 as outpatients. Of the outpatients, 27 were managed for an average of 2.5 days as inpatients and then completed dalteparin therapy as outpatients. The remaining 81 patients were managed exclusively as outpatients with dalteparin. For all outpatients the overall symptomatic recurrence rate of venous thromboembolism was 5.6% (6/108) with only 1.9% (2/108) major bleeds. There were a total of four deaths with none due to pulmonary embolism or major bleed.This prospective study suggests that outpatient management of pulmonary embolism is feasible and safe for the majority of patients.


1998 ◽  
Vol 79 (05) ◽  
pp. 897-901 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernard A. Charbonnier ◽  
Jean-Noël Fiessinger ◽  
J. D. Banga ◽  
Ernst Wenzel ◽  
Pascal d’Azemar ◽  
...  

SummaryBackground: Clinical trials have been performed to compare with standard heparin a once or a twice daily regimen of low-molecular-weight heparin but no direct comparison has been done between these two low-molecular-weight heparin regimens in terms of efficacy and safety with a long-term clinical evaluation.Methods: Patients with proximal deep vein thrombosis, confirmed by venography were randomly assigned to either nadroparin (10,250 AXa IU/ml) twice daily or nadroparin (20,500 AXa IU/ml) once daily for at least 5 days. Regimens were adjusted to bodyweight. Oral anticoagulants were started on day 1 or 2 and continued for 3 months. Patients were followed up for 3 months. The composite outcome of venous thromboembolism and death possibly related to pulmonary embolism was the primary measure of efficacy. Major bleeding was the principal measure of safety. The study was designed to show equivalence between the two regimens.Results: Recurrent thromboembolic events or death possibly related to pulmonary embolism were reported in 13 patients in the once daily group (4.1%) and in 24 patients of the twice daily group (7.2%): (absolute difference 3.1% in favor of the once daily regimen; 95% confidence interval -6.6%, +0.5%). Major bleeding episodes during nadroparin treatment occurred in 4 (1.3%) and 4 patients (1.2%) in the once and twice daily groups, respectively.Conclusions: A nadroparin regimen of one injection per day is at least as effective and safe as the same total daily dose divided over two injections for the treatment of acute deep vein thrombosis.


2019 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. 107602961989041
Author(s):  
Chu Chen ◽  
Qing Tang ◽  
Wenjuan Zhang ◽  
Huijun Yuan ◽  
Ying Huai ◽  
...  

At present, there is no consistent understanding of the effect of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) prescription in the prevention of the deep vein thrombosis (DVT), though TCM has been widely used in China. To evaluate the efficacy of TCM prescription combined with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for preventing DVT after major orthopedics surgery. All the retrieved articles were evaluated using specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Then, data were extracted and evaluated for inclusion in a randomized controlled trial. In this study, variables included relative risk (RR), mean difference (MD), and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Overall, 16 articles were included with 1538 patients, 768 in the combination group (combination of TCM prescription and LMWH) and 770 in the LMWH group. The results indicated that in the combination group, the incidence of DVT (RR: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.23-0.50, P < .00001) and d-dimer levels (standardized mean difference: −1.19, 95% CI: −1.80 to −0.58, P = .0001) was significantly lower than that in the LMWH group. Furthermore, the combination treatment obviously decreased the concentration of fibrinogen (MD: −1.19, 95% CI: −2.13 to −0.25, P = .01). The combination of TCM prescription and LMWH could significantly reduce the incidence of DVT, suggesting that it may be a more effective prophylaxis measure for DVT after major orthopedics surgery.


BMJ ◽  
1982 ◽  
Vol 284 (6313) ◽  
pp. 375-379 ◽  
Author(s):  
V V Kakkar ◽  
B Djazaeri ◽  
J Fok ◽  
M Fletcher ◽  
M F Scully ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document