What initial velocity model do we need for full waveform inversion?

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Chauris ◽  
M. Noble ◽  
C. Taillandier
Keyword(s):  
Initial Velocity ◽  
Waveform Inversion ◽  
Velocity Model ◽  
Full Waveform Inversion ◽  
Full Waveform

scholarly journals Full-Waveform Inversion for Imaging Faulted Structures: A Case Study from the Japan Trench Forearc Slope

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ehsan Jamali Hondori ◽  
Chen Guo ◽  
Hitoshi Mikada ◽  
Jin-Oh Park
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Data ◽  
Initial Velocity ◽  
Waveform Inversion ◽  
Velocity Model ◽  
Control Measures ◽  
Japan Trench ◽  
Full Waveform Inversion ◽  
Full Waveform ◽  
Time Migration ◽  
Shallow Sediments

AbstractFull-waveform inversion (FWI) of limited-offset marine seismic data is a challenging task due to the lack of refracted energy and diving waves from the shallow sediments, which are fundamentally required to update the long-wavelength background velocity model in a tomographic fashion. When these events are absent, a reliable initial velocity model is necessary to ensure that the observed and simulated waveforms kinematically fit within an error of less than half a wavelength to protect the FWI iterative local optimization scheme from cycle skipping. We use a migration-based velocity analysis (MVA) method, including a combination of the layer-stripping approach and iterations of Kirchhoff prestack depth migration (KPSDM), to build an accurate initial velocity model for the FWI application on 2D seismic data with a maximum offset of 5.8 km. The data are acquired in the Japan Trench subduction zone, and we focus on the area where the shallow sediments overlying a highly reflective basement on top of the Cretaceous erosional unconformity are severely faulted and deformed. Despite the limited offsets available in the seismic data, our carefully designed workflow for data preconditioning, initial model building, and waveform inversion provides a velocity model that could improve the depth images down to almost 3.5 km. We present several quality control measures to assess the reliability of the resulting FWI model, including ray path illuminations, sensitivity kernels, reverse time migration (RTM) images, and KPSDM common image gathers. A direct comparison between the FWI and MVA velocity profiles reveals a sharp boundary at the Cretaceous basement interface, a feature that could not be observed in the MVA velocity model. The normal faults caused by the basal erosion of the upper plate in the study area reach the seafloor with evident subsidence of the shallow strata, implying that the faults are active.

scholarly journals From tomography to full-waveform inversion with a single objective function

Geophysics ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 79 (2) ◽  
pp. R55-R61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tariq Alkhalifah ◽  
Yunseok Choi
Keyword(s):  
Objective Function ◽  
Initial Velocity ◽  
Waveform Inversion ◽  
Synthetic Data ◽  
Velocity Model ◽  
Full Waveform Inversion ◽  
Half Cycle ◽  
Velocity Models ◽  
Full Waveform ◽  
Single Objective

In full-waveform inversion (FWI), a gradient-based update of the velocity model requires an initial velocity that produces synthetic data that are within a half-cycle, everywhere, from the field data. Such initial velocity models are usually extracted from migration velocity analysis or traveltime tomography, among other means, and are not guaranteed to adhere to the FWI requirements for an initial velocity model. As such, we evaluated an objective function based on the misfit in the instantaneous traveltime between the observed and modeled data. This phase-based attribute of the wavefield, along with its phase unwrapping characteristics, provided a frequency-dependent traveltime function that was easy to use and quantify, especially compared to conventional phase representation. With a strong Laplace damping of the modeled, potentially low-frequency, data along the time axis, this attribute admitted a first-arrival traveltime that could be compared with picked ones from the observed data, such as in wave equation tomography (WET). As we relax the damping on the synthetic and observed data, the objective function measures the misfit in the phase, however unwrapped. It, thus, provided a single objective function for a natural transition from WET to FWI. A Marmousi example demonstrated the effectiveness of the approach.

Parametric convolutional neural network-domain full-waveform inversion

Geophysics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 84 (6) ◽  
pp. R881-R896 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yulang Wu ◽  
George A. McMechan
Keyword(s):  
Neural Network ◽  
Convolutional Neural Network ◽  
Initial Velocity ◽  
Prior Information ◽  
Waveform Inversion ◽  
Velocity Model ◽  
Full Waveform Inversion ◽  
Model Errors ◽  
Initial Model ◽  
Full Waveform

Most current full-waveform inversion (FWI) algorithms minimize the data residuals to estimate a velocity model based on the assumption that the updated model is the sum of a background model and an estimated model perturbation. We have performed reparameterization of the initial velocity model, by the weights in a convolutional neural network (CNN), to automatically capture the salient features in the initial model, as a priori information. The prior information in CNN weights is iteratively updated as regularization to constrain the CNN-domain inversion to refine the features captured in CNN pretraining by reducing the data misfit. Synthetic examples using a 1D increasing velocity function v(z) and a 2D smoothed version of the correct Marmousi2 model as initial models indicate that the performance of the CNN-domain FWI depends on the existence and accuracy of the prior information in the initial velocity model (i.e., whether features whose positions, shapes, and values are present in the correct model are approximately included in the initial model). Forty different sets of randomly initialized CNN weights are used to parameterize and test CNN-domain FWI, using a 2D smoothed Sigsbee model as the initial velocity model. All 40 sets invert for the Sigsbee salt body more accurately (with a smaller standard deviation of the final rms model errors), by CNN-domain FWI, than FWI does. Features that are not represented within the CNN hidden layers in the initial velocity model, and so cannot be recovered by CNN-domain FWI, can be recovered using the final CNN-domain FWI velocity model as the starting model in a subsequent conventional FWI.

scholarly journals Full Waveform Inversion for Imaging Faulted Structures; a Case Study from Japan Trench Forearc Slope

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ehsan Jamali Hondori ◽  
Chen Guo ◽  
Hitoshi Mikada ◽  
Jin-Oh Park
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Data ◽  
Initial Velocity ◽  
Waveform Inversion ◽  
Velocity Model ◽  
Control Measures ◽  
Japan Trench ◽  
Full Waveform Inversion ◽  
Full Waveform ◽  
Time Migration ◽  
Shallow Sediments

Abstract Full waveform inversion (FWI) of limited-offset marine seismic data is a challenging task due to the lack of refracted energy and diving waves from the shallow sediments, which are fundamentally required to update the long-wavelength background velocity model through a tomographic fashion. When these events are absent, a reliable initial velocity model is necessary to assure that the observed and simulated waveforms kinematically fit within an error less than half a wavelength to protect the FWI iterative local optimization scheme from cycle skipping. We use a migration-based velocity analysis (MVA) method, including a combination of the layer stripping approach and iterations of Kirchhoff prestack depth migration (KPSDM) to build an accurate initial velocity model for the FWI application on 2D seismic data with a maximum offset of 5.8 km. The data is acquired in the Japan Trench subduction zone, and we focus on the area where the shallow sediments overlying a highly reflective basement on top of the Cretaceous erosional unconformity are severely faulted and deformed. Despite the limited offsets available in the seismic data, our carefully designed workflow for data preconditioning, initial model building, and waveform inversion provides a velocity model which could improve the depth images down to a depth of almost 3.5 km. We present several quality control measures to assess the reliability of the resulting FWI model, including ray path illuminations, sensitivity kernels, reverse time migration (RTM) images, and KPSDM common image gathers. A direct comparison between the FWI and MVA velocity profiles reveals a sharp boundary at the Cretaceous basement interface, a feature which could not be observed in the MVA velocity model. The normal faults caused by the basal erosion of the upper plate in the study area reach the seafloor with evident subsidence of the shallow strata, implying that the faults are active.

Full-waveform inversion for full-wavefield imaging: Decades in the making

2021 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 324-334
Author(s):  
Rongxin Huang ◽  
Zhigang Zhang ◽  
Zedong Wu ◽  
Zhiyuan Wei ◽  
Jiawei Mei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Model Building ◽  
Seismic Imaging ◽  
Structural Information ◽  
Waveform Inversion ◽  
Velocity Model ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Full Waveform Inversion ◽  
Data Types ◽  
Velocity Models ◽  
Full Waveform

Seismic imaging using full-wavefield data that includes primary reflections, transmitted waves, and their multiples has been the holy grail for generations of geophysicists. To be able to use the full-wavefield data effectively requires a forward-modeling process to generate full-wavefield data, an inversion scheme to minimize the difference between modeled and recorded data, and, more importantly, an accurate velocity model to correctly propagate and collapse energy of different wave modes. All of these elements have been embedded in the framework of full-waveform inversion (FWI) since it was proposed three decades ago. However, for a long time, the application of FWI did not find its way into the domain of full-wavefield imaging, mostly owing to the lack of data sets with good constraints to ensure the convergence of inversion, the required compute power to handle large data sets and extend the inversion frequency to the bandwidth needed for imaging, and, most significantly, stable FWI algorithms that could work with different data types in different geologic settings. Recently, with the advancement of high-performance computing and progress in FWI algorithms at tackling issues such as cycle skipping and amplitude mismatch, FWI has found success using different data types in a variety of geologic settings, providing some of the most accurate velocity models for generating significantly improved migration images. Here, we take a step further to modify the FWI workflow to output the subsurface image or reflectivity directly, potentially eliminating the need to go through the time-consuming conventional seismic imaging process that involves preprocessing, velocity model building, and migration. Compared with a conventional migration image, the reflectivity image directly output from FWI often provides additional structural information with better illumination and higher signal-to-noise ratio naturally as a result of many iterations of least-squares fitting of the full-wavefield data.

Multi-parameter model building for the Qiuyue structure using four-component ocean-bottom seismometer data

Geophysics ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-52
Author(s):  
Yuzhu Liu ◽  
Xinquan Huang ◽  
Jizhong Yang ◽  
Xueyi Liu ◽  
Bin Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Wave Velocity ◽  
Waveform Inversion ◽  
Velocity Model ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Velocity Analysis ◽  
Full Waveform Inversion ◽  
Ocean Bottom ◽  
Ocean Bottom Seismometer ◽  
Full Waveform ◽  
P Wave Velocity

Thin sand-mud-coal interbedded layers and multiples caused by shallow water pose great challenges to conventional 3D multi-channel seismic techniques used to detect the deeply buried reservoirs in the Qiuyue field. In 2017, a dense ocean-bottom seismometer (OBS) acquisition program acquired a four-component dataset in East China Sea. To delineate the deep reservoir structures in the Qiuyue field, we applied a full-waveform inversion (FWI) workflow to this dense four-component OBS dataset. After preprocessing, including receiver geometry correction, moveout correction, component rotation, and energy transformation from 3D to 2D, a preconditioned first-arrival traveltime tomography based on an improved scattering integral algorithm is applied to construct an initial P-wave velocity model. To eliminate the influence of the wavelet estimation process, a convolutional-wavefield-based objective function for the preprocessed hydrophone component is used during acoustic FWI. By inverting the waveforms associated with early arrivals, a relatively high-resolution underground P-wave velocity model is obtained, with updates at 2.0 km and 4.7 km depth. Initial S-wave velocity and density models are then constructed based on their prior relationships to the P-wave velocity, accompanied by a reciprocal source-independent elastic full-waveform inversion to refine both velocity models. Compared to a traditional workflow, guided by stacking velocity analysis or migration velocity analysis, and using only the pressure component or other single-component, the workflow presented in this study represents a good approach for inverting the four-component OBS dataset to characterize sub-seafloor velocity structures.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document